Discourse-organizational patterns in English and SpanishSome notes on the thematic management of news reports

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alonso Belmonte, I. (1997) Estrategias textuales y su realización temática en español: Un estudio de corpus [Textual strategies and their thematic realization in Spanish: A corpus study]. RESLA, 121, 55-74.
• Ariel, M. (1990) Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
• Arús, J. (2007) On the ‘aboutness’ of Theme. In M. Losada, P, Ron, S. Hernández, & J. Casanova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN Conference (CD ROM Publication).
• Arús, J. (2010) On Theme in English and Spanish: A comparative study. In E. Swaine (Ed.), Thresholds and potentialities of Systemic Functional Linguistics: Multilingual, multimodal and other specialised discourses (pp. 23-48). Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università Di Trieste.
• Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003) Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bäcklund, I. (1991) Theme in English telephone conversation. Language Sciences, 14(4), 545-564.
• Berry, M. (1996) What is theme? A(nother) personal view. In M. Berry, C.S. Butler, R.P. Fawcett, & G. Huang (Eds.), Meaning and form: Systemic functional interpretations. Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday (pp. 1-64). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
• Berry, M. (2013) Contentful and contentlight subject themes in informal spoken English and formal written English. In G. O’Grady, T. Bartlett, & L. Fontaine (Eds.), Choice in language: Applications in text analysis (pp. 243-268). London: Equinox.
• Berry, M., Thompson, G., & Hillier, H. (forthcoming). Theme and variations. In M.A. Gómez, F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza, & F. Gonzálvez (Eds.) Theory and practice in functional-cognitive space Amsterdam John Benjamins.
• Biber, D. (1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (1995) The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.
• Butler, C. (2003) Structure and function. A guide to three major structural functional theories. Part 2: From clause to discourse and beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Casanova, V., & Franco, A. (2006) Tema, rema y focalización: Del enunciado al texto. Análisis de títulos y leads de prensa [Theme, rheme and focalization: From statement to text. Analysis of press headlines and leads]. Quórum Académico, 3(2), 55-81.
• Chafe, W.L. (1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
• Chafe, W.L. (1996) Inferring identifiability and accessibility. In T. Fretheim & J. Gundel (Eds.), Referents and referent accessibility (pp. 37-46). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Chao, K.H. (2002) Thematic progression in the argumentative essays of EFL senior high school students. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. National Chengchi University.
• Clark, H.H., & Haviland, S.E. (1977) Comprehension and the given-new contract. In R.O. Freedle (Ed.), Discourse production and comprehension (pp. 1-40). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
• Cornish, F. (1999) Anaphora, discourse and understanding: Evidence from English and French. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Daneš, F.(1974) Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 100-128). Prague: Academia.
• Downing, A. (1991) An alternative approach to Theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word, 42(2), 119-143.
• Dubois, B.L. (1987) A reformulation of thematic progression typology. Text, 7(2), 89-116.
• Eggins, S. (2004) An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.
• Enkvist, N.E. (1973) Theme dynamics and style: An experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 51, 127–35.
• Erteschik-Shir, N. (1997) The dynamics of focus structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fetzer, A. (2008) Theme zones in contrast: An analysis of their linguistic realization in the communicative act of a non-acceptance. In M.A. Gómez González, J.L. Mackenzie, & E.M. González Álvarez (Eds.), Languages and cultures in contrast and comparison (pp. 3-31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Firbas, J. (1992) Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fodor, J.D., & Sag, I. (1982) Referential and quantificational indefinites. Linguistics and Philosophy, 51, 355-398.
• Francis, G. (1989) Thematic selection and distribution in written discourse. Word, 40(2), 201-222.
• Fries, P.H. (1981) On the status of theme: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1-38.
• Fries, P.H. (1995) Themes, methods of development, and texts. In R. Hasan & P.H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: From the perspective of functions in discourse (pp. 317-359). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Fries, P.H. (2009) The textual metafunction as a site for a discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. In G. Forey & G. Thompson (Eds.), Text type and texture (pp. 8-44). London: Equinox.
• Fries, P.H., & Francis, G. (1992) Exploring theme: Problems for research. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics, 61, 45-59.
• Ghadessy, M. (1995) Thematic development and its relationship to registers and genres. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 129-145). London: Pinter.
• Givón, T. (1983a) Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction. In T. Givón (Ed.), Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study (pp. 1-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Givón, T. (Ed.) (1983b) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-linguistic study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Goatly, A. (2008) Explorations in stylistics. London: Equinox.
• Gómez González, M. A. (1994) The relevance of Theme in the textual organization of BBC news reports. Word, 45(3), 293-305.
• Gómez González, M. A. (1997) A contrastive critique of Topic and Theme in Functional Grammar (SFG). RESLA, 121, 75-94.
• Gómez González, M. A. (1998a) Towards an alternative account of FG Topic. Verba, 251, 345-356.
• Gómez González, M. A.  (1998b) About topicality and thematicity in Functional Grammar (FG) and Systemic Functional Grammar. Seminarios de Lingüística, 21, 49-67. Gómez González, M. A. (1998c) The ins and outs of the notion of ‘aboutness’. Interface, 13(1), 19-32.
• Gómez González, M. A. (1998d) A corpus based analysis of extended multiple Themes in Present day English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 3(1), 81-114.
• Gómez González, M. A. (2001) The theme-topic interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Gómez González, M. A. (2002) First mention orientation in discourse. In L. Iglesias & S. Doval (Eds.), Studies in contrastive linguistics (pp. 37-48). Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicaciones de la USC.
• Gómez González, M. A. (2004) Functional Grammar and the dynamics of discourse. In J.L. Mackenzie & M.A. Gómez González (Eds.), A new architecture for Functional Grammar (pp. 211‑243). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Grosz, B.J., & Sidner, C.L. (1986) Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3), 175-204.
• Gundel, J.K. (1978) Stress, pronominalization and the given-new distinction. Working Papers in Linguistics, 10(2), 1-13.
• Gundel, J.K. (1988) Universals of topic-comment structure. In M. Hammond, E. Moravczik, & J. Wirth (Eds.), Studies in syntactic typology (pp. 209-239). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 691, 274-307.
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994)[1985] An introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed). London: Edward Arnold.
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004) An introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
• Hannay, M., & Gómez González, M.A. (2012) Thematic parentheticals in Dutch and English. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 6(1-3), 99-127.
• Heim, I. (1982) The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts.
• Irmer, M. (2011) Bridging inferences. Constraining and resolving under-specification in discourse interpretation. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.
• Jalilifar, A.R. (2010) The status of theme in applied linguistics articles. Asian ESP Journal, 6(2), 7-39.
• Jackendoff, R. (1972) Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Khalil, E.N. (2005) Grounding: Between figure-ground and foregrounding-backgrounding. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 31, 1-21.
• Lambrecht, K. (1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Langacker, R.W. (2009) Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Lavid, J., Arús, J., & Moratón, L. (2010) Signalling genre through Theme: The case of news reports and commentaries. Proceedings of the 8th MAD: Signalling Text Organisation , 82-92.
• Longacre, R.E. (1981) A spectrum and profile approach to discourse analysis. Text, 11, 337-59.
• Longacre, R.E. (1989) Two hypothesis regarding text generation and analysis. Discourse Processes, 121, 413-60.
• Mann, W.C., & Thompson, S.A. (1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243-281.
• Martin, J. R. (1992) English text: System and structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Martin, J.R. (1997) Analysing genre: Functional parameters. In F. Christie & J.R. Martin (Eds.), Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 3-39). London: Cassell.
• Martinez Lirola, M. (2009) Main processes of thematization and postponement in English. Bern: Peter Lang.
• Mathesius, V. (1939) O takzvaném aktuálním členění věty. Slovo a slovesnost, 51, 171-174 [Translated into English in Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics, 1, 1975, 467-480].
• McCabe, A. (1999) Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Aston University.
• McCabe, A., & Alonso Belmonte, I. (2000) Theme, rheme and cognitive representation in Spanish and English texts. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 401, 77-94.
• Moya, A.J. (2003) Thematic and topical structuring in three subgenres. A contrastive Study. Miscelánea, 271, 131-154.
• Moya, A.J. (2006) The continuity of topics in journal and travel texts. A discourse functional perspective. Functions of Language, 13(1), 37-76.
• Moya, A.J., & Ávila, J.A. (2009) Thematic progression of children’s stories as related to different stages of cognitive development. Text & Talk, 29(6), 755-774.
• Munday, J. (1997) Systems in translation: A computer-assisted systemic analysis of the translation of García Márquez. Ph.D. thesis. University of Bradford.
• Nwogu, K.N. (1990) Discourse variation in medical texts: Schema, theme and cohesion in professional and journalistic accounts. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
• Nwogu, K., & Bloor, T. (1991) Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. In E. Ventola (Ed.) Functional and systemic linguistics: Approaches and uses (pp. 369-384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Ping, A.L. (2005) Talking themes: The thematic structure of talk. Discourse Studies, 71, 701-732.
• Plum, G.A. (1988) Textual and contextual conditioning in spoken English: A genre-based approach. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Sydney.
• Prince. E.F. (1992) The ZPG letter: subjects, definiteness, and information status. In S. Thompson & W. Mann (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fund raising text (pp. 295-325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Ravelli, L.J. (2004) Signalling the organization of written texts: hyper-Themes in management and history essays. In L.J. Ravelli & R.A. Ellis (Eds.), Analysing academic writing (pp. 104-130). London: Continuum.
• Reinhart, T. (1981) Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica, 27(1), 1-38.
• Rose, D. (2001) Some variations in Theme across languages. Functions of Language, 8(1), 109-145.
• Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Taboada, M. (1995) Theme markedness in English and Spanish: A systemic-functional approach. MS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
• Taboada, M. (2004) Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Thompson, G., & Thompson, S. (2009) Theme, subject and the unfolding of text. In G. Forey & G. Thompson (Eds.), Text type and texture: In honour of Flo Davies (pp. 45-69). London: Equinox.
• Tomlin, R.S., Forrest, L., Pu. M., & Kim, M.H. (1997) Knowledge integration and information management in discourse. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction (pp. 63-111). London: Sage.
• Trujillo, F., & Fortes, M.R. (2002) Estructura temática de las noticias de prensa sobre violencia doméstica: Un ejercicio de Análisis Crítico del Discurso [Thematic structure of news reports on domestic abuse: A Critical Discourse Analysis exercise]. In F. Trujillo Sáez & M.R. Fortes Ruiz (Eds.), Violencia doméstica y coeducación: Un enfoque multidisciplinar [Domestic abuse and coeducation: A multidisciplinary approach] (pp. 157-170). Barcelona: Octaedro.
• Vallduví, E. (1992) The informational component. New York: Garland.
• Vallduví, E., & Engdahl, E. (1996) The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 341, 459-519.
• Van Dijk, T. (1981) Sentence topic and discourse topic. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Studies in the pragmatics of discourse (pp. 177-193). The Hague: Mouton.
• Van Dijk, T. (2011) Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
• Whittaker, R. (1995) Thematic development in academic and non-academic texts. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Thematic development in English texts (pp. 105-128). London: Pinter.
• Williams, I.A. (2006) Towards a target-oriented model for quantitative contrastive analysis in translation studies. Languages in Contrast, 6(1), 1-45.