Diseño y validación de la plataforma PLEVALEX como respuesta a los retos de diseño de exámenes de lenguas para fines específicos

Referencias bibliográficas

• Alderson, J.C. y L. Hamp-Lyons (1996). “TOEFL preparation courses: A study of washback”. TESOL Quarterly 13: 280-297.
• Alderson, J.C. y A.H. Urquhart (1985). “The effect of students’ academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests”. Language Testing 2: 192-204.
• Anglin, G.J., H. Vaez y K.L. Cunningham (2002). Visual Representations and Learning: The Role of Static and Animated Graphics. Lexington: Kentucky University Press.
• Alvermann, D.E. y C.R. Hynd (1989). “Effects of prior knowledge activation modes and text structure on non-science majors’ comprehension of physics”. Journal of Education Research 83: 97-102.
• Cargill, M. (2004). “Transferable skills within research degrees: a collaborative genre-based approach to developing publication skills and its implications for research education”. Teaching in Higher Education 9: 83-98.
• Chapelle, C.A. y D. Douglas (2006). Assessing Language through Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Chen, H.C. y M.F. Graves (1995). “Effects of previewing and providing background knowledge on Taiwanese college students’ comprehension of American short stories”. TESOL Quarterly 29: 663-686.
• Connelly, M. (1997). “Using ctests in English with post-graduate students”. English for Specific Purposes 16: 139-150.
• Cumming, A., L. Grant, P. Mulcahy-Ernt y D. Powers (2005). A teacher-verification study of prototype speaking and writing tasks for new TOEFL. (TOEFL Monograph Series Rep. No. 26). URL: http://ftp.ets.org/pub/toefl/998777.pdf [28/06/07].
• Douglas, D. y J. Smith (1997). Theoretical underpinnings of the Test of Spoken English revision project. (TOEFL Monograph Series Rep. No. 9). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. URL: http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-97-02.pdf [28/06/07].
• Folse, K. (2006). The Art of Teaching Speaking. Michigan: Michigan University Press.
• Fulcher, G. (1999). “Assessment in English for academic purposes: putting content validity in its place”. Applied Linguistics 20: 221-236.
• Fulcher G. (2003). “Interface design in computer-based language testing”. Language Testing 20: 384-408.
• Fulcher, G. y R. Márquez Reiter (2003). “Task difficulty in speaking tests”. Language Testing 20: 321-344.
• García Laborda, J. (2004). “HIEO: Investigación y desarro- llo de una herramienta informáti- ca de evaluación oral multilingüe”. Didáctica, Lengua y Literatura 16: 77-88.
• García Laborda, J. (2006a). “PLEVALEX: a new platform for oral testing in Spanish”. Eurocall Review 9: 4-7. URL: http://www.eurocalllanguages.org/news/newsletter/9/index.html [28/06/07].
• García Laborda, J. (2006b). “¿Qué pueden aportar las nue- vas tecnologías al examen de selectividad de inglés? Un análisis de fortalezas y oportunidades”. Revista de CC Educación 201: 151-166.
• García Laborda, J. y L.G. Bejarano (2005). “Análisis de la ne- cesidad de creación de páginas web para la evaluación y bare- mación de estudiantes interna- cionales: una experiencia internacional” en M.L. Carrió Pastor (ed.), Perspectivas interdisciplinares de la lingüística aplicada, 399-404. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
• García Laborda, J. y E. Enríquez Carrasco (2005). “¿Es HERMEX una plataforma válida para diagnosticar lingüísticamente? Un análisis funcional”. TEAM, 3: 30-32.
• Hamp-Lyons, L. (1998). “Ethical test preparation practice: the case of the TOEFL”. TESOL Quarterly 32: 329-337.
• Herrera Soler, H. (2005). “El test de elección múltiple: herramienta básica en la Selectividad” en Herrera Soler, H. y J. García Laborda (eds.), Estudios y criterios para una selectividad de calidad en el examen de inglés, 65-98. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia.
• Jackson, J. (2005). “An interuniversity, cross-disciplinary analysis of business education: perceptions of business faculty in Hong Kong”. English for Specific Purposes 24: 293-306.
• Jacoby, S. y T. McNamara (1999). “Locating competence”. English for Specific Purposes 18: 213-241.
• Jamieson, J., S. Jones, I. Kirsch, P. Mosenthal y C. Taylor (2000). TOEFL 2000 Framework: A Working Paper (TOEFL Monograph Series Rep. No. 16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service URL: http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RM-00-06.pdf [28/06/07].
• Jeffries, R., J.R. Millar, C. Wharton y K.M. Uyeda (1991). “User interface evaluation in the real world: A comparison of four techniques”. Proceedings ACM CHI´91 Conference, 119-124. Seattle: ACM Press.
• Jensen, C. y C. Hansen (1995). “The effect of prior knowledge on EAP listening-test performance”. Language Testing 12: 99- 119.
• Krekeler, C. (2006). “Language for special academic purposes (LSAP) testing: The effect of background knowledge revisited”. Language Testing 23: 99- 130.
• Kobrin, J.L. y J.W. Young (2003). “The cognitive equivalence of reading comprehension test items via computerized and paper-and-pencil administration”. Applied Measurement in Education 16: 115-140.
• Lewis, C.P., C. Wharton y J. Rieman (1990). “Testing a walkthrough methodology for theorybased design of walk-up and use-interface”. Proceedings ACM CHI´90 Conference, 235- 242. Seattle: ACM Press.
• Lewkowicz, J.A. (2000). “Aut- henticity in language testing: some outstanding questions”. Language Testing 17: 43-64.
• Nielsen, J. (1994). “Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristic”. Proceedings ACM CHI´94 Conference, 152-158. Seattle: ACM Press.
• Nielsen, J. y R.L. Mack (1994). Heuristic Evaluation. Usability Inspection Methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Nielsen, J. y R. Molich (1990). “Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces”. Proceedings ACM CHI´90 Conference, 249-256. Seattle: ACM Press.
• Oller, J.W. Jr. (1979). “Explaining the reliable variance in tests: the validation problem” en E.J. Briere y F.B. Hinofotis (eds.), Concepts in Language Testing: Some Recent Studies, 61-74. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.
• Oller, J.W. Jr. (1983). Issues in Language Testing Research. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.
• Roever, C. (2001). “Web-based language testing”. Language Learning & Technology 5: 84-94.
• Salmani-Nodoushan, M.A. (2003). “Text familiarity, reading tasks, and ESP test performance: a study on Iranian LEP and Non-LEP university students”. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal 3: 1-14. URL: http://www.readingmatrix.com/ar ticles/nodoushan/article.pdf [28/06/07].
• Spence-Brown, R. (2001). “The eye of the beholder: authenticity in an embedded assessment task Language Testing”. Language Testing 18: 463-474.
• Yoshida, K. (1998). Student Re- commendations for ESP Curriculum Design. Ann Arbour, MI: ERIC Reproduction Service. Documento ED424782. URL:http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/17/07/08.p df [28/06/07].
• Wise, S.L. y B.S. Plake (1989). “Research on the effects of administering tests via computers”. Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice 8: 5-10.
• Zareva, A. (2005). “What is new in the new TOEFL-iBT 2006 test format?”. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 2: 45-57. URL: http://eflt.nus.edu.sg/v2n22005/zareva.htm [28/06/07].