El desarrollo de la institución del amicus curiae en la jurisprudencia internacional

Referencias bibliográficas

• ALA’I, P., “Judicial Lobbying at the WTO: the Debate over the Use of Amicus Curiae Briefs and the U.S. Experience”, Fordham ILJ, vol. 24, nº 1-2, (2000), 62-94.
• ANGELET, N., “Le tiers à l’instance dans la procédure de règlement des différends de l’OMC”, en RUIZ FABRI, H. y SOREL, J.-M., Le tiers à l’instance devant les jurisdictions internacionales, Pedone, Paris 2005, 207-238, p. 237.
• ANGELL, E., “The Amicus Curiae: American Development of English Institutions”, ICLQ, vol. 16 (1967), 1017-1044, p. 1018.
• ARP, B., Las minorías nacionales y su protección en Europa, Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid 2008, pp. 61-89 y 265-378.
• ASCENSIO, H., “L’Amicus Curiae devant les jurisdictions internationales”, RGDIP, vol. CV, nº 4 (2001), 897-930, pp. 911-914.
• BARTHOLOMEUSZ, L., “The Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals”, Non-State Actors and International Law, vol. 5 (2005), 209-286, pp. 236-237.
• BEDJAOUI, M., “L’humanité en quête de paix et de développement (II)”, RCADI, vol. 325 (2006), 9-542, p. 462.
• BELLHOUSE, J. y LAVERS, A., “The Modern Amicus Curiae: a Role in Arbitration?”, CJQ, vol. 23 (2004), 187-200, pp. 191-192.
• BINDSCHEDLER, R.L., “La protection de la propriété privée en droit international public”, RCADI, vol. 90 (1956), 174-306, pp. 290-295.
• BOURGON, S., OGETTO, K. y BENDLER, W., “Associations of Defense Counsel – Development and Role”, en BOHLANDER, M., BOED, R. y WILSON, R.J., Defense in International Criminal Proceedings: Cases, Materials and Commentary, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley 2006, 483-617, pp. 505-512.
• BRONWLIE, I., Principles of Public International Law, 7th ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008, pp. 555-585.
• BROWNLIE, I., “International Law at the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations: General Course on Public International Law”, RCADI, vol. 255 (1995), 9-228, pp. 62-63.
• CALVO-GOLLER, K.N., The Trial Proceedings of the International Criminal Court. ICTY and ICTR Precedents, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden 2006, p. 238.
• CAMPBELL BLACK, H., Black’s Law Dictionary, 3rd ed., West Publishing, St. Paul 1933, p. 105.
• CANÇADO TRINDADE, A.A., “International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium (I)”, RCADI, vol. 316 (2005), 9-439, pp. 252-333.
• CARPIO DELGADO, J. del, Las víctimas ante los tribunales penales internacionales ad hoc, Tirant, Valencia 2009, pp. 61-114.
• CARRILLO SALCEDO, J.A. (coord.), La criminalización de la barbarie: la Corte Penal Internacional, Consejo General del Poder Judicial, Madrid 2000.
• CAWLEY, J.B., “Friend of the Court: How the WTO Justifies the Acceptance of the Amicus Curiae Brief from Non-Governmental Organizations”, Penn State ILReview, vol. 23, nº 1 (2004), 47-78.
• COLLINS, L., “Provisional and Protective Measures in International Litigation”, RCADI, vol. 234 (1992), 9-238, pp. 128-151.
• DAILLIER, P., FORTEAU, M. y PELLET, A., Droit international public, 8eme ed., LGDJ-Lextenso, Paris 2009, pp. 709-723.
• DAVID, E., “La Cour pénale internationale”, RCADI, vol. 313 (2005), 325-454, pp. 369-390.
• DE LA CRUZ IGLESIAS, L., “Las comunicaciones amicus curiae en el Mecanismo de Solución de Diferencias de la Organización Mundial del Comercio: el asunto amianto”, REDI, vol. LIV, nº 1 (2002), 159-179, pp. 167-178.
• DÍEZ DE VELACO VALLEJO, M., Instituciones de Derecho Internacional Público, 17ª ed., Tecnos, Madrid 2009, pp. 303-307.
• DINSTEIN, Y., “The Interaction between Customary International Law and Treaties”, RCADI, vol. 322 (2006), 243-428, pp. 338-345.
• DURLING, J. y HARDIN, D., “Amicus Curiae Participation in WTO Dispute Settlement: Reflections on the Past Decade”, en YERXA, R. y WILSON, B. (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: the First Ten Years, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005, 221-231.
• ESCOBAR HERNÁNDEZ, C., “Corte Penal Internacional, Consejo de Seguridad y crimen de agresión: un equilibrio difícil e inestable”, en MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ, F.M. (ed.), El Derecho internacional en los albores del siglo XXI. Homenaje al profesor Juan Manuel Castro-Rial Canosa, Trotta, Madrid 2002, 243-264, pp. 251-262.
• ESCOBAR HERNÁNDEZ, C., “Creación de una jurisdicción penal internacional”, Cuadernos de la Escuela Diplomática, nº 4 (2000).
• FERNÁNDEZ DE GURMENDI, S.A. y FRIMAN, H., “The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court”, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, vol. 3 (2000), 289-336, pp. 296-298.
• FERRER LLORET, J., “La protección internacional de las minorías nacionales en Europa: el caso de los Romaníes”, AEDI, vol. XXII (2006), 205-254, pp. 211-213 y 218- 241.
• FOSTER, C.E., “Social Science Experts and Amicus Curiae Briefs in International Courts and Tribunal: The WTO Biotech Case”, NILR, vol. LII (2005), 433-459, pp. 454-455.
• FRIMAN, H., “The International Criminal Court and Participation of Victims: A Third Party to the Proceedings?”, Leiden JIL, vol. 22 (2009), 485-500.
• GARNER, B.A. (ed.), Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th ed., West Publishing, St. Paul 2004, p. 93.
• GAUTIER, Ph., “NGOs and Law of the Sea”, en TREVES, T. y otros (eds.), Civil Society, International Courts and Compliance Bodies, TMC Asser Press, The Hague 2005, 233-242, pp. 240-241.
• GONZÁLEZ CAMPOS, J.D., SÁNCHEZ RODRÍGUEZ, L.I. y ANDRÉS SÁEZ DE SANTA MARÍA, P., Curso de Derecho Internacional Público, 4ª ed., Aranzadi, Cizur Menor 2008, pp. 126-127.
• GUTIÉRREZ DE CABIEDES E HIDALGO DE CAVIEDES, P., La tutela jurisdiccional de los intereses supraindividuales: colectivos y difusos, Aranzadi, Elcano 1999.
• HUDSON, M.D., “Les avis consultatifs de la Cour permanente de justice internationale”, RCADI, vol. 8 (1925), 341-412, p. 388. JIMÉNEZ PIERNAS, C. (Dir.), Introducción al Derecho Internacional Público. Práctica Española, Tecnos, Madrid 2009, pp. 267-269.
• KIRSCH, Ph., “The International Criminal Court: Building on the Principal Legal Systems in the World”, en YEE, S. y MORIN, J.-Y. (eds.), Multiculturalism and International Law. Essays in Honour of Edward McWhinney, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden 2009, 315-328, pp. 323-326.
• KNAHR, Ch., Participation of Non-State Actors in the Dispute Settlement System of the WTO: Benefit or Burden?, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main 2007, p. 14.
• KRISLOV, S.: “The Amicus Curiae Brief: From Friendship to Advocacy”, Yale LJ, vol. 72 (1962-1963), 694-721, p. 695.
• KRISLOV, S.: “The Role of the Attorney General as Amicus Curiae”, en VV.AA., Roles of the Attorney General of the United States, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington 1968, 71-103, p. 72.
• LA ROSA, A.-M., “Les tiers devant les jurisdictions pénales internationales”, en RUIZ FABRI, H. y SOREL, J.-M., Le tiers à l’instance…, op. cit., 196-190, pp. 101-103.
• LIROLA DELGADO, I. y MARTÍN MARTÍNEZ, M.M., La Corte Penal Internacional: Justicia vs Impunidad, Ariel, Barcelona 2001.
• LÓPEZ-FRAGOSO ÁLVAREZ, T., La intervención de terceros a instancia de parte en el proceso civil español, Marcial Pons, Madrid 1990, p. 163 (nota 312).
• LOWENFELD, A.F., “Public Law in the International Arena: Conflict of Laws, International Law and some Suggestions for their Interaction”, RCADI, vol. 163 (1979), 311-448, pp. 344-372.
• MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ, F.M., Derecho Internacional Público, 4ª ed., Trotta, Madrid 2005, pp. 213-223.
• MAVROIDIS, P.C., “Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing”, en VON BOGDANDY, A., MAVROIDIS, P.C. y MÉNY, Y. (eds.), European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002, 317-329.
• MENGOZZI, P., “Private International Law and the WTO Law”, RCADI, vol. 292 (2001), 249-385, pp. 359-371.
• MONACO, R. y CURTI GIALDINO, C., Diritto Internazionale Pubblico, 3ª ed., Utet Giuridica, Torino 2009, pp. 441-44.
• MONACO, R., “Cours général de droit international public”, RCADI, vol. 125 (1968), 93-336, pp. 280-288.
• MOSLER, H., “The International Society as a Legal Community”, RCADI, vol. 140 (1974), 1-320, pp. 70-79.
• NERLICH, V., “The status of ICTY and ICTR precedent in proceedings before the ICC”, en STAHN, C. y SLUITER, G. (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Martinus Nijfhoff, Leiden 2009, 305-325, pp. 321-324.
• OLÁSOLO ALONSO, H., “The Role of The International Criminal Court in Preventing Atrocity Crimes through Timely Intervention”, Inaugural Lecture as Chair in International Criminal Law and International Criminal Procedure at Utrecht University, de 18-10-2010, p. 4.
• OLÁSOLO, H., The Triggering Procedure of the International Criminal Court, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden 2005, pp. 107-110.
• PACE, W.R. y SCHENSE, J., “Coalition for the International Criminal Court at the Preparatory Commission”, en LEE, R.S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court. Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Transnational Publishers, Ardsley 2001, pp. 705-734.
• PASTOR RIDRUEJO, J.A., Curso de Derecho Internacional Público y Organizaciones Internacionales, 14ª ed, Tecnos, Madrid 2010, pp. 185-258.
• PRÉVOST, D., “WTO Subsidies Agreement and Privatized Companies: Appellate Body Amicus Curiae Briefs”, LIEI, vol. 27, nº 3 (2000), 279-394.
• QUESADA ALCALÁ, C., “Algunas consideraciones sobre el procedimiento de constitución de los tribunales penales internacionales ad hoc”, en VV.AA., Homenaje a Luis Rojo Ajuria: escritos jurídicos, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Cantabria, Santander 2002, pp. 1099-1115.
• REEVES, J. y FINLANSON, W.F., History of the English Law, from the Time of the Romans to the end of the Reign of Elizabeth, vol. II, Reeves & Turner, London 1869, p. 636.
• REMIRO BROTÓNS, A., RIQUELME CORTADO, R., ORIHUELA CALATAYUD, E., DÍEZ-HOCHLEITNER RODRÍGUEZ, J. y PÉREZ-PRAT DURBÁN, J., Derecho Internacional, Tirant, Valencia 2007, pp. 269-288.
• ROBBINS, J., “False friends: Amicus Curiae and Procedural Discretion in WTO appeals under the Hot-Rolled Lead/Asbestos Doctrine”, Harvard ILJ, vol. 44, nº 1 (2003), 317-329.
• ROMANO, C.P.R., NOLLKAEMPER, A. y KLEFFNER, J.K. (eds.), International Criminal Courts, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004.
• ROSAS, A., “Joinder of Parties and Third Party Intervention in WTO Dispute Settlement”, en WEISS, F., Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures, Cameron May, London 2000, 77-87, pp. 83-86
• SALAMA, R., “Fragmentation of International Law: Procedural Issues Arising in Law of the Sea Disputes”, MLAANZ Journal, vol. 19 (2005), 24-55, pp. 45-46.
• SALMON, J., Dictionnaire de Droit International Public, Bruylant, Bruxelles 2001, p. 62.
• SCHWABAS, W.A., The UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006, p. 621.
• SEIDL-HOHENVELDERN, I., “International Economic Law: General Course on Public International Law”, RCADI, vol. 198 (1986), 9-264, p. 132.
• SERRA DOMÍNGUEZ, M., “Parte Coadyuvante”, en PELLISÉ PRATS, B., Nueva Enciclopedia Jurídica, Tomo XIX, Editorial Francisco Seix, Barcelona 1989, pp. 1-4.
• SHAW, M.N., International Law, 6th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2008, pp. 257-259.
• SHELTON, D., “Participation of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Judicial Proceedings”, AJIL, vol. 88 (1994), 611-642, p. 617
• TOMUSCHAT, Ch., “International Law: Ensuring the Survival of Mankind on the Eve of a New Century: General Course on Public International Law”, RCADI, vol. 281 (1999), 9-438, pp. 149-155.
• TREVES, T., Diritto Internazionale. Problemi Fondamentali, Giuffrè, Milano 2005, pp. 189-220.
• UNIDROIT, “Joint American Law Institute/Unidroit Working Group on Transnational Rules of Civil Procedure”, Study LXXVI (2000), p. 18.
• VERHOEVEN, J., Droit International Public, Be Boeck & Larcier, Bruxelles 2000, pp. 295-304.
• WALDOCK, H., “General Course on Public International Law”, RCADI, vol. 106 (1962), 1-251, pp. 192-211.
• WILLIAMS, S. y WOOLAVER, H., “The Role for the Amicus curiae before International Criminal Tribunals”, International Criminal Law Review, vol. 6 (2006), pp. 151-189.
• ZAGORAC, D., “International Courts and Compliance Bodies: The Experience of Amnesty International”, en TREVES, T. y otros (eds.), Civil Society…, op. cit., 11-39, p. 16.