Investigación clínica y discapacidad.Una aproximación desde la Convención Internacional de derechos de las personas con discapacidad

Referencias bibliográficas

• Agrawal, M. (2003), ‘Voluntariness in clinical research at the end of life’, Journal of Pain and Sympton Management, 25, S25-S32.
• Annas, G. J.; Grodin, M. A. (2008), ‘Th e Nuremberg Code’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Ema-nuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 136-40.
• Appelbaum, P. S.; Roth, L. H.; Lidz, C. (1982), ‘Th e therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric re-search’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 319-29.
• Appelbaum, P. S.; Lidz, C. W.; Grisso, T. (2004), ‘Th erapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors’, IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 26:2, 1-8.
• Appelbaum, P. S.; Lidz, C. W. (2008), ‘Th e therapeutic misconception’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 633-44.
• Beauchamp, T.; Childress, J. (2001), Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th ed, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Beecher, H. K. (1970), Research and the Individual: Human Studies, Little Brown, Boston.
• Bonham, V. H.; Moreno, J. (2008), ‘Research with captive populations’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 461-74.
• Bosk, C. L. (2003), ‘Obtaining voluntary consent for research in desperately ill patients’, Medical Care, 40, 9 Supple-ment, V64-V68.
• Brock, D. W. (1993), ‘Informed consent’, Life and Death: Philosophical Essays in Biomedical Ethics, Cambridge Univer-sity Press, New York, 21-54.
• Brock, D. W. (2008), ‘Philosophical justifi cations on informed consent in research’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 606-12.
• Brody, H.; Miller F. G. (2003), ‘Th e clinician-investigator: Unavoidable but manageable tension’, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13, 329-46.
• Buchanan, A. E.; Brock, D. W. (1989), Deciding for Others: Th e Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making, Cambridge Uni-versity Press, New York.
• Cantor, N. L. (2009), Making Medical Decisions for the Profoundly Mentally Disabled, Th e MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• Dworkin, G. (1988), Th e Th eory and Practice of Autonomy, Cambridge University Press, New York.
• Ellis, J. W. (1992), ‘Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: Balancing considerations of autonomy and protection’, Villanova Law Review, 37, 1779-809.
• Emanuel, E. J. (2003), ‘Ending concerns about undue inducement’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 32, 100-5
• Emanuel, E. J.; Grady, G. (2008), ‘Four paradigms of clinical research and research oversight’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 222-30.
• Faden, R. R.; Beauchamp, T. (1986), A History and Th eory of Informed Consent, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Fink, A. S. (2010), ‘Enhancement of surgical informed consent by addition of repeat back’, Annals of Surgery, 252, 27-36.
• Freedman, B. (1987a), ‘Scientifi c value and validity as ethical requirements for research: A proposed explanation’, IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 9:6, 7-10.
• Freedman, B. (1987b), ‘Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research’, New England Journal of Medicine, 317, 141-5.
• Fried, C. (1974), Medical Experimentation: Personal Integrity and Social Policy, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
• Garzón Valdés, E. (1988), ‘¿Es éticamente justifi cable el paternalismo jurídico?, Doxa, 5, 155-73.
• Griso, T.; Appelbaum, P. S. (1998), Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Hochhauser, M. (2002), ‘Th erapeutic misconception and ‘recruiting doublespeak’ in the informed consent process’, IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 24:1, 11-2.
• Horng, S. et al (2002), ‘Descriptions of benefi ts and risks in consent forms for Phase I oncology trials’, New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 2134-40.
• Iacono, T. (2006), ‘Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intelectual disabilities as participants in research’, Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31:3, 173-9.
• Jones, J. H. (2008), ‘Th e Tuskegee syphilis experiment’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Ema-nuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 86-96.
• Katz, J. (1973), ‘Th e regulation of human research: Refl ections and proposals’, Clinical Research, 21, 785-91.
• Killen, J. Y. (2008), ‘HIV research’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 97-109.
• Klingman, M.; Culver, C. M. (1992), ‘An analysis of interpersonal manipulation’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17, 173-97.
• Lacy, D. A. (2003-2004), ‘Am I my brothers keeper: Disabilities, paternalism and threats to self ’, Santa Clara Law Review, 44, 55-99.
• Levine, C. (1988), ‘Has AIDS changed the ethics of human subject research?’, Law Medicine and Health Care, 16, 167-73.
• Levine, R. J. (1986), Ethics and Regulations of Clinical Research, 2nd ed, Yale University Press, New Haven.Levine, R. J. (1988), ‘Uncertainty in clinical research’, Law, Medicine and Health Care, 16, 174-82.
• Levine, R. J. (1992), ‘Clinical trials and physicians as double agents’, Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 65, 65-74.
• Levine, R. J. (2008), ‘Th e nature, scope and justifi cation of clinical research. What is research? Who is subject?’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 211-21.
• McClimens, A.; Allmark, P. (2011), ‘A problem with inclusion in learning disability research’, Nursing Ethics, 18:5, 633-9.Miller, F. G.;Rosenstein D. L. (2003), ‘Th e therapeutic orientation to clinical trials’, New England Journal of Medicine, 348, 1383-6.
• Moser, D. J. et al (2004), ‘Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners’, Comprehensive Psychiatry, 45, 1-9.
• Moye, J. et al (2006), ‘Empirical advances in the assessment of the capacity to consent to medical treatment’, Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 1054-77.
• Murphy, J. G. (1974), ‘Incompetence and paternalism’, Archiv fur Rechts-und Sozialphilosophy, 60, 465-86.
• Ramiro Avilés, M. A. (2006), ‘A vueltas con el paternalismo jurídico’, Derechos y Libertades, 15, 211-56.
• Reverby, S. M. (2010), ‘Invoking “Tuskegee”: Problems in health disparities, genetic, assumptions, and history’, Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21:3, Supplement, 26-34.
• Reverby, S. M. (2011), ‘Normal exposure and inoculation syphilis: A PHS “Tuskegee” doctor in Guatemala, 1946-1948’, Journal of Policy History, 23:1, 6-28.
• Rosenstein, D. L.; Miller F. G. (2008), ‘Research involving those at risk for impaired decision-making capacity’, Th e Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics, ed. E. J. Emanuel, C. Grady, R. A. Crouch, R. K. Lie, F. G. Miller and D. Wendler, Oxford University Press, New York, 437-45.
• Singer, R. (1977), ‘Consent of the unfree: Medical experimentation and behaviour modifi cation in the closed institu-tions. Part II’, Law and Human Behaviour, 1, 101-62.
• Sreenivasan, G. (2003), ‘Does informed consent to research require comprehension?’, Lancet, 362, 2016-8.
• Waggoner, W. C.; Mayo, D. M. (1995), ‘Who understand? A survey of 25 words or phrases commonly used in propo-sed clinical Research consent forms’, IRB:Ethics and Human Research, 17:1, 6-9.
• Weindling, P. (2001), ‘Th e origins of informed consent: the international scientifi c commission on medical war crimes and the Nuremberg Code’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 75:1, 37-71.
• Wendler, D.; Rackoff , J. (2001), ‘Informed consent and respecting autonomy: What’s a signature got to do with it?’, IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 23:3, 1-4.
• Wendler, D. et al (2003), ‘Nonbenefi cal research with individuals who cannot consent: Is it ethically better to enroll healthy of aff ected individuals’, IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 25:4, 1-4.
• Wertheimer, A. (2008), ‘Exploitation in clinical research’, Exploitation and Developing Countries. Th e Ethics of Clinical Research, eds JS Hawkins and EJ Emanuel, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 63-104.
• Wilkinson, M.; Moore, E. (1997), ‘Inducement in research’, Bioethics, 11, 373-89