Los estudios de resumen documental en las ciencias de la documentaciónun recorrido histórico desde sus orígenes hasta las teorías actuales

  1. Izquierdo Alonso, Mónica
  2. Sánchez Domínguez, María del Carmen
Revista:
Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

ISSN: 1886-2438

Año de publicación: 2011

Número: 6

Páginas: 209-228

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4995/RLYLA.2011.904 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista de lingüística y lenguas aplicadas

Resumen

Se realiza una categorización de los estudios del resumen documental a partir de la revisión de los diferentes modelos y propuestas de los investigadores en este campo. Se señala la evolución de la investigación en esta actividad de tratamiento documental de contenido, atendiendo a las aproximaciones de la textolingüística y el estructuralismo lingüístico, los enfoques semióticos, las orientaciones de la psicología cognitiva, o el funcionalismo sociointeraccional. Para ello, se establecen distintas etapas, que van desde los postulados precientíficos iniciales hacia avances metateóricos y procedimentales más complejos y dinámicos. Las nuevas orientaciones y tendencias son clasificadas en base a tres dimensiones: el enfoque del texto/producto, el enfoque del proceso-actividad resumidora y la aproximación comunicativo-sociocultural, como puente integrador entre ambos. Finalmente, se alude a una fusión necesaria de las teorías resumidoras existentes, sin renunciar a toda la riqueza de perspectivas y visiones que ofrecen cada una de ellas, para configurar un mapa consolidado de modelos resumidores en distintos ámbitos de especialidad.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, S. y Baker, D.B. (1968). "Mission and discipline orientation in scientific abstracting and indexing services". Library Trends 16-3: 307-322.
  • American National Standard Institute (ANSI) (1979). ANSI Z39.14-1979: American National Standard for writing abstracts. New York: ANSI.
  • Atherton, P. 1977. Handbook for information systems and service. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Asociación Española de Normalización (1990). UNE 50-103-90. Documentación. Preparación de resúmenes. Madrid: AENOR.
  • Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR) (1984). NF Z 44-004. Recommandations aux auteurs des articles scientifiques et techniques pour la rédaction des résumés. París: AFNOR.
  • Ayuso García, M.D. (1998). "Los índices, boletines de sumarios y revistas de resúmenes". (Coord.) Las fuentes de información: estudios teórico-prácticos. En Isabel de Torres. Madrid: Síntesis, 279-304.
  • Barzilay, R. y Elhadad, M. (1999). "Using lexical chains for text summarization". Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. Eds. Inderjeet Mani and Mark T. Maybury. MIT Press, 111-121.
  • Baumann, J. (1990). La comprensión lectora: como trabajar la idea principal en el aula. Madrid: Visor.
  • Baxendale, P.B. (1958). "Machine-made index for technical literature: an experiment". IBM Journal of Research and Development 2: 354-361. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.24.0354
  • Beaugrande, R. A. y Dressler, W.U. (1997). Introducción a la lingüística del texto. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Bereite, C. y Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
  • Boldivici, J.A. y Atlman, J.W. (1967). Toward improved techniques for abstracting and extracting scientific and technical literature. Pittsburg, PA: American Institute for Research.
  • Borko, H. y Bernier, C.L. (1975). Abstracting concepts and methods. New York: Academic Press.
  • Borko, H. y Chatman, S. (1963). "Criteria for acceptable abstracts: a survey of abstracter's instructions". American Documentation 1963: 149-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140211
  • Cleveland, D. y Cleveland, A. (1983). Introduction to Indexing and Abstracting. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Collison, R. (1971a). The annals of abstracting (1665-1975). Los Ángeles, CA: Universidad de California.
  • Collison, R. (1971b). Abstracts and abstracting services. Santa Bárbara, Co.: American Bibliographical Center.
  • Committee of Scientific and Thecnical Communication of tha National Academy of Sciences and National Academy or Engineering. (1969). Scientific and technical communication: a pressing national problem and recommendations for its solution. Washington: National Academic of Sciences.
  • Copley, E.J. (1975). A guide to referativnyi zhurnall. London, British Library: Science Reference Library.
  • Courrier, Y. (1976). "Analyse et langages documentaires". Documentaliste 13/5-6: 178-189.
  • Coyaud, M. (1972). Linguistique et documentation. Paris: Libraries Laroussse.
  • Cremmins, E T. (1982). The art of abstracting. Philadelphia: ISI.
  • Cross, C. y Oppenheim, Ch. (2006). "A genre analysis of scientific abstracts". Journal of Documentation 62-4: 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610700953
  • Cunningham, A.M. y Wicks, W. (1992). Guide to careers in abstracting and indexing. Philadelphia, PA: National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services.
  • Chaumier, J. (1978). Analyse et langages documentaires: Le traitement linguistique de l'information documentaire. París: Entreprise Moderne de l'Edition.
  • Chemical Abstracts Service (1967). Directions for abstractor. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
  • Douville, J.A. (1982). "Bibliographic control: indexing and abstracting services in biochemistry - a chronological and historical approach". Biochemistry collection: a cross-disciplinary survey of the literature. Special collections, vol (2), Philadelphia: Haworth Press, 75- 85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J300v01n02_08
  • Doyle, L.B. (1969). "Indexing and abstracting by association". American Documentation 13-4: 378-390. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090130404
  • Dronberger, G.B. y Kowitz, G.T. (1975). "Abstracts readability as a factor in information systems". JASIS 26-2: 108-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260206
  • Duppuy, A. (et al.) (2003). "Quality of abstracts in 3 clinical Dermatology Journals". Archives of Dermatology 139: 589-539. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.139.5.589
  • Earl, L.L. (1970). "Experiments in automatic abstracting and indexing". Information Storage and Retrieval, 6-4: 313-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(70)90025-2
  • Edmundson, H.P.; Oswald, V. A. & Wyllis, R.E. (1959). Automatic indexing and abstracting of the contents of documents. Los Angeles, CA: Planning Research Corporation.
  • Edmundson, H.P. (1969). "New methods in automatic extracting". Journal of the ACM 16-2: 264-285. https://doi.org/10.1145/321510.321519
  • Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E. y Sigel, A. (1995). "How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting: Four core working steps of an expert abstractor". Information Processing and Management 31-5: 631-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(95)00028-F
  • Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (1998). Summarizing information. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72025-3
  • Frohmann, B. (1990). "Rules of Indexing: A Critique of Mentalism in Information Retrieval Theory". Journal of Documentation 46-2: 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026855
  • Frohmann, B. (1992). "The Power of Images: A Discourse Analysis of the Cognitive Viewpoint". Journal of Documentation 48-4: 365-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026904
  • Gardin, J.C. (1973). "Document analysis and linguistic theory". Journal of Documentation 29-2: 137-168. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026553
  • Gregg L.W. y Steinberg E.R, (eds.) (1980). Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  • Hartley J. 1994. "Three ways to improve the clarity of journal abstracts". British Journal of Educational Psychology 64: 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01106.x
  • Hartley J. y Sydes, M. (1995). Structured Abstracts in the Social Sciences: Presentation, Readability and Recall. London: British Library Research and Development Department.
  • Hartley, J.; Sydes, M. y Blurton, A. (1996). "Obtaining information accurately and quickly". Journal of Information Science 22-5: 349-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159602200503
  • Hartley, J. y Sydes, M. (1997). "Are structured abstracts easier to read than traditional ones?. Journal of Research in Reading 20-2: 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00025
  • Hartley, J. y Benjamin, M. (1998). "An evaluation of structured abstracts in journals published by the British Psychology Society". British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68: 43-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01303.x
  • Hartley, J. (2000a). "Clarifying the abstracts of systemic reviews". Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 88-4: 332-337.
  • Hartley, J. (2000b). "Are structured abstracts more or less accurate than traditional ones? A study in the psychological literature". Journal of Information Science 26-4: 273-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600408
  • Hartley, J. (2000c). "Typographic settings for structured abstracts". Journal of technical writing and communication 30-4: 355-365. https://doi.org/10.2190/H306-J8B7-WXD2-A6Y6
  • Hartley, J. 2003. "Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: the case for structure". Science Communication, 24-3: 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547002250301
  • Hartley, J. (2004). "Current findings from research on structured abstracts". Journal of the Medical Library Association 92-3: 368-371.
  • Herner, S. (2007). "Brief history of information science". Journal of the American society for information science 35-3: 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630350308
  • Hjørland, B. (2002). "Domain analysis in information science: Eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative". Journal of Documentation 58: 422-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210431136
  • Hovy, E. (1993). "Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations". Artificial Intelligence 63: 341-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(93)90021-3
  • Hovy, E. (1997). Automated text summarization in summarist. ACL/EACL Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization 18-24.
  • Inderjeet, M. y Maybury, M.T. Ed. (1999). Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. The MIT Press.
  • Inderjeet, M. (2001). Automatic Summarization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • International Federation for Documentation (1969). Abstracting Services. Vol I: Science, Techology, Medicine Agriculture. FID: The Haye, Netherlands.
  • International Standard Organization (1976). ISO 214-1976. Documentation: Abstracts for publications and documentation. Ginebra: ISO.
  • Izquierdo Alonso, M. (2000). "Nuevos enfoques en el estudio del tratamiento documental de contenido desde los presupuestos de las ciencias del lenguaje". Revista SCIRE: representación y organización del conocimiento 6-1: 43-163.
  • Izquierdo Alonso, M. y Moreno Fernández, L.M. (2009). El resumen documental: un reto didáctico. Madrid: ANABAD.
  • Izquierdo Alonso, M. y Moreno Fernández, L.M. (2010). "Perspectives of the studies on document abstracting: towards an integrated review of models and theoretical approaches". Journal of Documentation 66-4: 563-584. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011052957
  • Izquierdo Alonso, M. y Sánchez Dominguez, (2010). "Bases epistemológicas y operativas de la didáctica del resumen documental: un enfoque basado en la competencia resumidora". Perpectivas em Ciência da Informaçao 15-3: 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-99362010000300002
  • Izquierdo Arroyo, J.M. (1990). "Teoría del resumen". Esquemas de Lingüística documental. Barcelona: PPU, 465-482.
  • Izquierdo Arroyo, J.M. (1993). "De la Semiótica del discurso a la Semiótica Documental". J.A. Moreiro.: Aplicación de las Ciencias del Texto al Resumen Documental. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III, 199-216.
  • Johnson, P. (1989). La evaluación de la comprensión lectora. Un enfoque cognitivo. Madrid: Visor.
  • Johnson, F.C. (et. al.) (1993). "The application of linguistic processing to automatic abstract generation". Journal of Document & Text Management 1-3: 215- 239.
  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: a paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lancaster, F.W. (1968). Information retrieval systems: characterises, testing and evaluation. New York: Wiley.
  • Lancaster, F.W. (1972). Vocabulary control for information retrieval. Washington DC: Information Resources Press.
  • Lancaster, F.W. (1991). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Illinois: University, Graduate School of Library and Information Science.
  • Lehmam, A. (1999). "Text structuration leading to an automatic summary system: RAFI". Information Processing and Management 35: 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(98)00043-0
  • Library of Congress. Science and Technology Division National (1963). A guide to the world's abstracting and indexing services in science and technology. Washington: National Federation of Science Abstracting and Indexing Services, Report nº. 102.
  • Lin, C.Y. y Hovy, E. (1997). "Identifying topics by position". Proceedings of the ACL Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, 283-290. https://doi.org/10.3115/974557.974599
  • López Yepes, J.L. (1989). Fundamentos de información y documentación. Madrid: Eudema.
  • Luhn, H.P. 1958. "The automatic creation of literature abstracts". IBM Journal of Research and Development 2: 159-165. https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.22.0159
  • Luhn, H.P. (1959). Keyword in context for technical literature (KWIC-Index). NY: IBM; Yorktown Heights.
  • Manzer. B. M. (1977). The abstract journal 1790-1920: Origin, development and diffusion. London: The Scarecrow Press.
  • Marcu, D. (1997). The Rhetorical Parsing, Summarization, and Generation of Natural Language Texts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.
  • Marcu, D.(2000). The Theory and Practice of Discourse Parsing and Summarization. Cambridge; Massachusetts: Institute of Technology.
  • Mark, L.M. y Tarullo, H. (2003). "Technology and the transformation of abstracting and indexing services". Serials Review 29-3: 213-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2003.10764832
  • Mathis, B.A. (1972). Techniques for the evaluation and improvement of computer produced abstracts. Ohio: Computer and information science research.
  • Mathis, B.A. y Rush, J.E. (1985). Abstracting: the nature and definition of abstracting. E.D. Dym. Ed. Subject and information analysis. New York: Dekker, 445- 484.
  • Mayes, P.B. 1978. "A comparison of the readability of synopses and original articles for engineering synopses" Journal of the American for Information Science, 29-6: 312-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630290610
  • Martinsson, A. 1983. Guía para la redacción de artículos científicos destinados a la publicación. París: UNESCO.
  • Moens, M.-F. ; Uyttendaele, C. y Dumortier, J. (2000). "Intelligent Information Extraction from Legal Texts". Information & Communications Technology Law 9-1: 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/136008300111583
  • Montesi, M. (2006). Métodos de evaluación y calidad de resúmenes documentales. Gijón: TREA.
  • Montesi, M. y Owen, J.M. (2007). "Revision of author abstracts: how it is carried out by LISA editors". ASLIB Proceedings 59-1: 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530710725197
  • Montesi, M. y Owen, J.M. (2008). "Research journal articles as document genres: exploring their role in knowledge organization". Journal of Documentation, 64-1: 143-167. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844196
  • Montesi, M. y Navarrete, T. (2008). "Classifying web genres in context: A case study documenting the web genres used by a software engineer". Information Processing and Management 44-4: 1410-1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2008.02.001
  • Moreiro González, J.A. (1988). "Los resúmenes de autor: su aplicación y su lugar de comunicación científica". Cuadernos de Documentación de Cajas de Ahorros 3/7-8: 33-56.
  • Moreiro González, J.A. (1989). "Método y tipología del resumen científico". En López Yepes, J. Comp. Fundamentos de información y documentación. Madrid: EUDEMA, 414-430.
  • Moreiro González, J.A. (1993). Aplicación de las Ciencias del Texto al Resumen Documental. Madrid: Universidad Carlos III.
  • Moreiro González, J.A. (1996). "La técnica del resumen científico". En López Yepes, J. (Comp.): Manual de información y documentación. Madrid: Pirámide, 273-309.
  • Moreiro González, J.A. (2004). El contenido de los documentos textuales: su análisis y representación mediante el lenguaje natural. Gijón: TREA.
  • Moreno Fernández, L.M. y Baño Aledo, M.E. (2004). "La calidad del resumen en las publicaciones científicas españolas: estudio de caso". Revista SCIRE 10-1: 91-100
  • National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engeneering (1969). Scientific and technical communication. A pressing national problem and recommendations for its solution. Washington: National Academic of Sciences.
  • National Federation of Science Abstracting and Indexing Services (1963). A national plan for science abstracting and indexing services. Philadelphia: NFSAIS.
  • National Federation of Science Abstracting and Indexing Services (1970). A position statement on the SATCOM-Report. Philadelphia: NFSAIS.
  • National Information Standards Organization (1997). ANSI/NISO Z39.14-1997. Guidelines for Abstracts. Bethesda, Maryland, USA: NISO Press.
  • Neufel, M.L; Cornog, M. y Sperr, J.L. (1983). Abstracting and indexing services in perspective. Arlington, VA: Information Resources Press.
  • Neufel, M.L. y Cornog, M. (1986). Abstracting and indexing career guide. Philadelphia, PA: National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services.
  • Owen, D.B. y Hanchey, M.M. (1974). Abstracts and indexes in Science and Technology: a descriptive guide. Metuchers, NY: Scarecrow Press.
  • Paice, C.D. (1981). "The automatic generation of literature abstracts: An approach based on the identification of self-indicative phrases". R.N. Oddy et al. Eds.: Information retrieval research. London: Butterworth, 172-191.
  • Paice, C.D. (1990). "Constructing literature abstracts by computer: techniques and prospects". Information Processing & Management 26-1: 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(90)90014-S
  • Payne, D.; Munger, S.J.Y Altman, J.W. (1962). A textual abstracting technique: a preliminary development and evaluation support. American Pittsburg, PA.: Institute for Research.
  • Peronard, M. (1994). "La evaluación de la comprensión de los textos escritos: el problema del resumen". Lenguas Modernas 21: 181-193.
  • Pinto, M. (1987). "La operación de resumir: formulación teórica, procedimientos y perspectivas". Documentación de las Ciencias de la información 11: 75-102.
  • Pinto, M. (1989). "Introducción a los servicios de indización y resumen". Boletín de la Asociación Andaluza de Bibliotecarios 5-17: 5-13.
  • Pinto, M. (1991). Análisis Documental. Fundamentos y procedimientos. Madrid: Eudema.
  • Pinto, M. (1992). El resumen documental: principios y métodos. Madrid; Salamanca: FGSR.
  • Pinto, M. (1994a). "Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Concept and Practice of Written Text's Documentary Content Analysis (WTDCA)". Journal of Documentation 50-2: 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026927
  • Pinto, M. (1994b). "Indicadores de calidad en la gestión de los procesos analítico-documentales". 4ª Jornadas Españolas de Documentación Automatizada. Gijón: FESABID: 190-204.
  • Pinto, M. (1995). "Documentation abstracting: toward a methodological model". Journal of the American society for information science 46-3: 225-234. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199504)46:3<225::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-N
  • Pinto, M. y Gálvez, C. (1996). Análisis documental de contenido: procesamiento de información. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Pinto, M. & Galvez, C. (1999a). "Paradigms for Abstracting Systems". Journal of Information Science 25-5: 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555159902500503
  • Pinto, M. y Lancaster, F.W. (1999b). "Abstract and bstracting in knowledge Discovery". Library Trends 48-1: 225-234.
  • Pinto, M. (2001). El resumen documental: paradigmas, modelos y métodos. Madrid: Fundación Germán Sánchez Ruipérez.
  • Pinto, M.; Garcia, F.J. ; Agustín, C. (2002). Indización y Resumen de documentos digitales y multimedia. Gijón: Trea.
  • Pinto, M. (2003a). "Abstracting/abstract adaptation to digital environments: research trends". Journal of Documentation 59-5: 581-608. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310499609
  • Pinto, M. 2003b. "Engineering the production of meta-information: the abstracting concern". Journal of Information Science 29-5: 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515030295006
  • Pinto, M. et. al. (2005). Aprendiendo a resumir: prontuario y resolución de casos. Gijón: Trea.
  • Pinto, M. (2006). "A grounded theory on abstracts quality: weighting variables and attributes". Scientometrics 69-2: 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0150-9
  • Puente, A. (2001). Comprensión de la lectura y acción docente. Madrid: FGSR.
  • Rosemary, K. 1976. "A Comparison of the Readability of Abstracts with Their Source Documents". Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27-2: 118-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270207
  • Rowley, J. (1982). Abstracting and Indexing. London: Clive Bingley.
  • Salton, G. Ed. (1971). The SMART retrieval system: experiments in automatic document processing. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Salton, G.; Buckley, C. y Singhal, A. (1994). "Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarisation of machine readable texts". Science 264: 1421-1426. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.264.5164.1421
  • Skolnik, H. (1979). "Historical development of abstracting". Journal of Chemical information and computer sciences 19-4: 215-218. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci60020a008
  • Solé, I. (1992). Estrategias de lectura. Barcelona: Graó/ICE.
  • Sparck Jones, K. (1993). Discourse modelling for automatic summarising. Technical Report nº. 290. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory.
  • Speight, F. Y., Ed. (1967). Guide for Source Indexing and Abstracting of the Engineering Literature. New York: Engineers Joint Council.
  • Spiro, B.C., y Brewer W.F. Eds. (1980). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Steere, W.C. (1976). Biological Abstracts/BIOSIS: The first fifty years.... NY: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2235-1
  • Taddio, T. (et al.) (1994). "Quality of non-structured and structured abstracts of original research articles in The British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association". Canadian Medical Association Journal 150: 1611-16115.
  • Tenopir, C. y Jacso, P. (1993). "Quality of abstracts". Online 17-39: 44-55.
  • Teufel, S. y Moens, M. (2002). "Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status". Computational Linguistics 28-2: 409- 445. https://doi.org/10.1162/089120102762671936
  • Thellefsen, T.B. y Thellefsen, M. (2003). "Problems concerning the process of subject analysis and the practice of indexing: a semiotic and semantic approach towards user oriented needs in document representation and information searching". Semiotica 144-1: 177- 218. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2003.022
  • Tibbo, H.R. (1993). Abstracting, Information Retrieval and the Humanities. Providing Access to Historical Literature. Chicago: American Library Association.
  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (1962). Guide for the Preparation and Publication of Synopses. Paris: UNESCO.
  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (1962). A code of good practice for scientifics publication. París: UNESCO. En [http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/ 001267/126727EB.pdf]. [Fecha de acceso: 28.11.2010].
  • Urquhart, CH. (1979). "Reading, looking and learning". Journal of Information Science 1-6: 333- 344. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555157900100604
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). La ciencia del texto: un enfoque interdisciplinario. Barcelona: Paidos.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. (1980). Macroestructures. An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Van Dijk, T.A. y Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
  • Van Risbergen C.J. y Sparck Jones, K. (1973). "A test for the separation of relevant and no relevant documents in experimental retrieval collections". Journal of Documentation 25: 251-257. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026557
  • Vickery, B.C. y Vickery, A. (1987). Information Science in Theory and Practice. London: Butterworths.
  • Weisgerber, D.W. (1997). "Chemical Abstracts Service chemical registry system: History, scope, and impacts". Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48-4: 349-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199704)48:4<349::AID-ASI8>3.3.CO;2-H
  • Weil, B.H. (1970). "Standards for writing abstracts". JASIS 22-4: 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630210507
  • Wheatley, A. y Armstrong, C.J. (1997a). A Survey of the Content and Characteristics of Electronic Abstracts. London: Joint Information Systems Committee.
  • Wheatley, A. y Armstrong, C.J. (1997b). "Metadata, recall and abstracts: can abstracts ever be reliable indicators of document value?" Aslib Proceedings 49-8: 206-213. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb051467
  • Wiley, D.L. (1994). "From print to Internet: Can the traditional abstracting and indexing services survive?" Database 7-6: 18-24.
  • Witty, F.J. (1973). "The beginnings of indexing and abstracting: some notes towards a history of indexing and abstracting in Antiquity and the Middle Ages". The Indexer 8-4: 193-198.
  • World Textile Abstracts Service (1975). Manual for abstractor. Manchester: The Library and Information Department, Shirley Institute.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet