Shaping the EU investment regime: choice of forum and applicable law in international investment agreements

  1. Francisco J. Pascual Vives
Revista:
Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

ISSN: 1989-4570

Año de publicación: 2014

Volumen: 6

Número: 1

Páginas: 269-294

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Resumen

El trabajo examina la interacción entre el Derecho de la Unión Europea y el régimen internacional de protección de las inversiones exteriores. Mientras las instituciones de la UniónEuropea y sus Estados miembros modelan el contenido de los futuros acuerdos europeos de inversión y definen el alcance de la política europea de inversiones, es importante analizar a la luz de la práctica más reciente, las posibles fórmulas de participación de la Unión Europea en el arbitraje de inversiones y la consideración del Derecho de la Unión Europea como derecho aplicable en el arbitraje de inversiones

Referencias bibliográficas

  • A. Broches, “The Convention On The Settlement Of Investment Disputes Between States And Nationals Of Other States: Applicable Law And Default Procedure”, In P. Sanders (Ed.), International Arbitration. Liber Amicorum For Martin Domke, The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1967, 12-22
  • A. De Luca, “New Developments On The Scope Of The Eu Common Commercial Policy Under The Lisbon Treaty: Investment Liberalization Vs. Investment Protection”, In K.P. Sauvant (Ed.), Yearbook On International Investment Law & Policy (20102011), Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, 165-215
  • A. Dimopoulos, “The Compatibility Of Future Eu Investment Agreements With Eu Law”, Legal Issues Of Economic Integration, Vol. 39, 2012, 447-471.
  • A. Dimopoulos, Eu Foreign Investment Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, P. 333.
  • A. Newcombe And Ll. Paradell, Law And Practice Of Investment Treaties, Alphen Aan Den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2009, Pp. 80-83.
  • A. Reinisch, “Les Investissements Intracommunautaires. Entre Droit Communautaire Et Accords Internationaux Sur L’investissement: Concilier L’inconciliable?”, Icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2013, 179-196, P. 194.
  • A. Reinisch, “The Proliferation Of International Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: The Threat Of Fragmentation Vs. The Promise Of A More Effective System? Some Reflections From The Perspective Of Investment Arbitration”, In I. Buffard, J. Crawford, A. Pellet And S. Wittich (Eds.), International Law Between Universalism And Fragmentation. Festschrift In Honour Of Gerhard Hafner, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2008, 107-126.
  • A.M. Steingruber, Consent In International Arbitration, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, Pp. 196-223.
  • A.R. Parra, “The Development Of The Regulations And Rules Of The International Centre For Settlement Of Investment Disputes”, Icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2007, 55-68, Pp. 57-61
  • A.R. Parra, “The Enforcement Of Icsid Arbitral Awards”, In R. Doak Bishop (Ed.), Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards Against Sovereigns, Jurisnet, Huntington, 2009, 131-138
  • And T. Eilmansberger, “Bilateral Investment Treaties…”, Op. Cit., P. 395.
  • B. Poulain And M. Raux, “Actualité Du Droit Européen Des Investissements Internationaux”, Revue Générale De Droit International Public, Vol. 115, No. 4, 2011, 113-140, Pp. 121-122.
  • C. Brown And I. Naglis, “Dispute Settlement In Future Investment Agreements”, In M. Bungenberg, A. Reinisch And
  • C. Brown And M. Alcover-Llubià, “The External Investment Policy Of The European Union In The Light Of The Entry Into Force Of The Treaty Of Lisbon”, In K.P. Sauvant (Ed.), Yearbook On International Investment…, Op. Cit., 145-163, Pp. 153-163
  • C. Kessedjian (Dir.), Le Droit Européen Et L’arbitrage D’investissement, Paris, Panthéon-Assas, 2011, P. 192.
  • Ch. Leben (Dir.), Le Contentieux Arbitral Transnational Relatif À L’investissement, Louvain-La-Neuve, Anthemis, 2006, Pp. 345-361
  • Ch. Schreuer, L. Malintoppi, A. Reinisch And A. Sinclair, The Icsid Convention: A Commentary, 2nd Ed., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, P. 1265.
  • Ch. Söderlund, “Intra-Eu Bit Investment Protection And The Ec Treaty”, Journal Of International Arbitration, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2007, 455-468, P. 462
  • Ch. Tietje (Eds.), Eu And Investment Agreements: Open Questions And Remaining Challenges, Baden-Baden, Nomos, 2013,
  • D. Caron And L.M. Caplan, The Uncitral Arbitration Rules. A Commentary, 2nd Ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, 111-146, Pp. 112-118.
  • E. Fernández Masiá, “El Incierto Futuro Del Arbitraje De Inversiones En Latinoamérica”, Arbitraje. Revista De Arbitraje Comercial Y De Inversiones, Vol. Ii, No. 3, 2009, 741-760
  • E. Gaillard And Y. Banifatemi, “The Meaning Of ‘And’ In Art. 42(1), Second Sentence, Of The Washington Convention: The Role Of International Law In The Icsid Choice Of Law Process”, Icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 18, 2003, 375-411;
  • E. Silva Romero, “Quel Arbitrage D’investissement (Institutionnel Ou Ad Hoc)?”, In C. Kessedjian (Dir.), Le Droit Européen…, Op. Cit., 93-118, Pp. 112-118.
  • F. Mantilla-Serrano, “¿Existe Hostilidad Hacia El Arbitraje De Inversión En América Latina?”, In M.A. Fernández-Ballesteros And D. Arias (Eds.), Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades, Madrid, La Ley, 2010, 789-806.
  • F.J. Pascual Vives, “Consent To Icsid Arbitration: Recent Conventional And Arbitral Practice”, Transnational Dispute Management, No. 2, 2011, 1-43, Pp. 17-42.
  • G. Sacerdoti, “Investment Arbitration Under Icsid And Uncitral Rules: Prerequisites, Applicable Law, Review Of Awards”, Icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2004, 1-48, Pp. 16-26
  • I. García Rodríguez, “Spanish Practice On Investment Treaties”, In C. Jiménez Piernas (Ed.), The Legal Practice In International And Community Law. A Spanish Perspective, Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff, 2007, 567-598, Pp. 591-597.
  • I.F.I. Shihata And A.R. Parra, “Applicable Substantive Law In Disputes Between States And Private Parties: The Case Of Arbitration Under The Icsid Convention”, Icsid Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 9, 1994, 183-213.
  • J. Gaffney, “How Important It Is To Develop A Coherent Case Law? The Role Of Judicial Dialogue In Investment Arbitration”, In C. Kessedjian (Dir.), Le Droit Européen…, Op. Cit., 47-77, Pp. 59-60
  • J.Á. Rueda García, “Eu Approves Regulation 1219/2012 On Existing Bits Between Eu Member States And Third Countries” At Http://Blogaila.Com/2012/12/27/Eu-Ap-Proves-Regulation-12192012-On-Existing-Bits-Between-Eu-Member-States-And-Third-Countries-By-Jose-Angel-Rue- Da-2/ (Last Accessed On 5 May 2013).
  • J.Á. Rueda García, “La Aplicabilidad Del Convenio De Nueva York Al Arbitraje De Inversiones: Efectos De Las Reservas Al Convenio”, Cuadernos De Derecho Transnacional, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2010, 203-232.
  • J.C. Fernández Rozas, “América Latina Y El Arbitraje De Inversiones: ¿Matrimonio De Amor O Matrimonio De Conveniencia?”, Revista De La Corte Española De Arbitraje, 2009, 13-38
  • J.-M. Sorel And V. Boré Eveno, “Article 31: General Rule On Interpretation”, In O. Corten And P. Klein (Eds.), The Vienna Convention On The Law Of Treaties. A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, 804-837, Pp. 828-829.
  • K. Arif, “Draft Report On The Future European International Investment Policy”, Pe454.567v01-00, Of 20 December 2010, P. 7.
  • K. Fach Gómez, “Latin America And Icsid: David Versus Goliath?”, Law And Business Review Of The Americas, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2011, 195-230
  • K. Von Papp, “Clash Of ‘Autonomous Legal Orders’: Can Eu Member State Courts Bridge The Jurisdictional Divide Between Investment Tribunals And The Ecj?. A Plea For Direct Referral From Investment Tribunals To The Ecj”, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2013, 1039-1081
  • M. Bungenberg, “The Division Of Competences Between The Eu And Its Member States In The Area Of Investment Policies”, In M. Bungenberg, J. Griebel And S. Hindelang (Eds.), European Yearbook Of International Economic Law: International Investment Law And Eu Law, Heidelberg, Springer, 2011, 29-42
  • M. Burgstaller, “European Law And Investment Treaties”, Journal Of International Arbitration, Vol. 26, 2009, 181216
  • M. Burgstaller, “Investor-State Arbitration In Eu International Investment Agreements With Third States”, Legal Issues Of Economic Integration, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2012, 207-221, P. 213.
  • M. Burgstaller, “Les Aspects Procéduraux De L’arbitrage – Qui Est Partie? Le Rôle De La Commission Européenne”, In C. Kessedjian Et Ch. Leben (Dirs.), Le Droit Européen Et L’investissement, Paris, Panthéon-Assas, 2009, 123-142.
  • M. Wierzbowski And A. Gubrynowicz, “Conflict Of Norms Stemming From Intra-Eu Bits And Eu Legal Obligations: Some Remarks On Possible Solutions”, In Ch. Binder, U. Kriebaum, A. Reinisch And S. Wittich (Eds.), International Investment…, Op. Cit., 544-560, P. 560.
  • N. Lavranos, “New Developments In The Interaction Between International Investment Law And Eu Law”, The Law And Practice Of International Courts And Tribunals, Vol. 9, 2010, 409-441
  • N. Maydell, “The European Community’s Minimum Platform On Investment Or The Trojan Horse Of Investment Competence”, In A. Reinisch And Ch. Knahr (Eds.), International Investment Law In Context, Utrecht, Eleven International, 2008, 73-92
  • N. Zambrana Tévar, La Determinación Del Derecho Aplicable Al Fondo En El Arbitraje De Inversiones, Cizur Menor, Aranzadi, 2010, P. 270.
  • P. Bernardini, “Icsid Versus Non-Icsid Investment Treaty Arbitration”, In M.A. Fernández-Ballesteros And D. Arias (Eds.), Liber Amicorum Bernardo…, Op. Cit., 159-188
  • R. Dolzer, “Contemporary Law Of Foreign Investment: Revisiting The Status Of International Law”, In Ch. Binder, U. Kriebaum, A. Reinisch And S. Wittich (Eds.), International Investment…, Op. Cit., 818-829, Pp. 824-825;
  • S. Robert-Cuendet, “Les Investissements Intracommunautaires. Entre Droit Communautaire Et Accords Internationaux Sur L’investissement: Concilier L’inconciliable?”, Revue Générale De Droit International Public, Vol. 115, No. 4, 2011, 853-895, P. 883.
  • S.A. Alexandrov, “Enforcement Of Icsid Awards: Articles 53 And 54 Of The Icsid Convention”, In Ch. Binder, U. Kriebaum, A. Reinisch And S. Wittich (Eds.), International Investment…, Op. Cit., 322-337
  • S.D. Franck, “The Legitimacy Crisis In Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions”, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 73, 2005, 15211625, Pp. 1539-1540
  • S.W. Schill, “Arbitration Procedure: The Role Of The European Union And The Member States In Investor-State Arbitration”, In C. Kessedjian (Dir.), Le Droit Européen…, Op. Cit., 129-147, Pp. 136-137 And 144-145.
  • S.W. Schill, “Luxemburg Limits: Conditions For Investor-State Dispute Settlement Under Future Eu Investment Agreements”, In M. Bungenberg, A. Reinisch And Ch. Tietje (Eds.), Eu And Investment Agreements…, Op. Cit., 37-54, Pp. 51-53.
  • T. Begic, Applicable Law In International Investment Disputes, Utrecht, Eleven International, 2005, Pp. 57-80.
  • T. Eilmansberger, “Bilateral Investment Treaties And Eu Law”, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 46, 2009, 383-429
  • Th. Buergenthal, “The Proliferation Of International Courts And The Future Of International Law”, Cursos Euromediterráneos Bancaja De Derecho Internacional, Vol. 5, 2001, 29-44, P. 41.
  • Unctad, “Recent Developments In Investor-State Dispute Settlement (Isds)”, No. 1, 2013, Pp. 29-30 At Http://Unctad.Org/En/Publicationslibrary/Webdiaepcb2013d3_En.Pdf (Last Accessed On 6 May 2013).
  • W.M. Reisman, “The Regime For Lacunae In The Icsid Choice Of Law Provision And The Question Of Its Threshold”, Icsid Review– Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 15, 2000, 362-381
  • Z. Douglas, “The Hybrid Foundations Of Investment Treaty Arbitration”, British Yearbook Of International Law, Vol. 74 (2003), 152-289, Pp. 213-226.
  • Z. Douglas, The International Law Of Investment Claims, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009, Pp. 42-49.