Cláusulas escalonadas multifunción en el arreglo de controversias comerciales internacionales

  1. Ana Fernández Pérez
Revista:
Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

ISSN: 1989-4570

Año de publicación: 2017

Volumen: 9

Número: 1

Páginas: 99-124

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.20318/CDT.2017.3615 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Resumen

El Derecho de los negocios internacionales es testigo de una creciente preferencia hacia las cláusulas escalonadas multifunción para el arreglo de controversias (MTDRCs) debido a la naturaleza adaptable de tales procesos en una amplia gama de conflictos. Sin embargo, la falta de claridad sobre su aplicabilidad persiste en algunas jurisdicciones. En este estudio se analiza la naturaleza conceptual de las cláusulas de varios niveles y se detallan los beneficios de las mismas. Pese a algunos problemas de funcionamiento estas cláusulas han llegado a ser reconocidas como un método comúnmente aceptado para la solución de las controversias en los contratos comerciales, particularmente en los contratos de construcción.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • D. Brock y R. Pither, “How International Law Firms might approach the Subject of ADR with their Clients”, ADR in Business: Practice and Issues across Countries and Cultures, vol. 2, Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2011
  • T. Clay, “El mercado del arbitraje”, Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. VII, nº 1, 2014
  • G. Wagner, “The Dispute Resolution Market”, Buffalo L. Rev.; vol. 62, nº 5, 2014
  • B. Wolski, “Using Dispute Systems Design to Identify, Explain and Predict Trends in the Settlement of International Commercial Disputes: The UNCITRAL and ICC ADR Initiatives” (S. Kierkegaard y M. Kierkegaard, eds.), Law, Governance and World Order, Hellerup (Dinamarca), International Association of IT Lawyers, 2012
  • S. Barona y C. Esplugues, “ADR Mechanisms and Their Incorporation into Global Justice in the Twenty-First Century: Some Concepts and Trends”, Global Perspective on ADR, Cambridge, Intersientia, 2014
  • M.A. Fernández Ballesteros, Avenencia o ADR. Negociación, mediación, peritajes, conciliación, pactos y transacciones, Madrid, Iurgium, 2014
  • E. Bertrand, “Arbitrage et médiation: l’impossible conciliation?”, Rev. dr. aff. int., 2001, nº 2
  • C. Punzi, “Relazioni fra arbitrato e le altre forme non guirisdizionali di soluzione delle liti”, Riv. arb., vol. XIII, 2003
  • Ch. Jorrosson, La notion d’arbitrage, París, LGDJ, 1987
  • Ch. Jarrosson, “Les frontières de l’arbitrage”, Rev. arb., 2001
  • J. Zekoll, Formalisation and Flexibilisation in Dispute Resolution, Leiden, Brill Nijhoff, 2014
  • A. Connerty, “ADR as a ‘Filter’ Mechanism: the Use of ADR in the Context of International Disputes”, Arbitration, vol. 79, nº 2, 2013
  • J.C. Fernández Rozas, “Rechazo de formalización judicial por la presencia de una cláusula imprecisa entre arbitraje y otros MASC en el sector de la automoción”, Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. VII, nº 2, 2014
  • L. Otis y C. Rousseau-Saine, “Le médiateur et les dilemmes éthiques: proposition d’un cadre de réflexion”, Festschrift Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri: From the Arab World to the Globalization of International Law and Arbitration, Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, Law & Business, 2015, pp. 121-141. <http://louiseotis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/ArticleKluwer.pdf
  • D. Ross, “Med-Arb/Arb-Med: A More Efficient ADR Process or an Invitation to a Potential Ethical Disaster?”, Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: The Fordham Papers, 2012
  • A. López De Argumedo Piñeiro, “Multi-Step Dispute Resolution Clauses”, Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades, Madrid, La Ley, 2010
  • S. Sánchez Lorenzo, Cláusulas en los contratos internacionales. Redacción y análisis, Barcelona, Atelier, 2012
  • N. Witkin, “Consensus Arbitration: a Negotiation-Based Decision-Making Process for Arbitrators”, Negotiation Journal; vol. 26, nº 3, 2010
  • M.L Moses, The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, 2ª ed., Nueva York, Cambridge University Press, 2012
  • M. Gomm Ferreira Dos Santos, “The Role of Mediation in Arbitration: The Use and the Challenges of Multi-tiered Clauses in International Agreements”, Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, vol. X, nº 38, 2013
  • H. Tang, “Combination of Arbitration with Conciliation: Arb-Med”, New Horizons in International Commercial Arbitration and Beyond (A.J. van den Berg, ed.), La Haya, Kluwer Law International, 2005
  • L. Cao, “Combining Conciliation and Arbitration in China: Overview and Latest Developments”, Int’l Arb. L. Rev., vol. 9, nº 3, 2006
  • S.A. Harpole, “The Combination of Conciliation with Arbitration in the People’s Republic of China”, J. Int’l Arb., vol. 24, nº 6, 2007
  • Y. Sato, “Hybrid Dispute Processing in Japan: Linking Arbitration with Conciliation”, Legal Discourse across Cultures and Systems (V.K. Bhatia, C.N. Candlin y J. Engberg, eds), Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press, 2008
  • M. Van der Hagen, “Les procédures de conciliation et de médiation organisées par les principaux instituts d’arbitrage et de médiation en Europe”, Revue de droit des affaires internationales, 1996
  • C. Imhoos, E. Schäfer y H. Verbist, ICC Arbitration in Practice, 2ª ed., Kluwer Law International, 2016
  • R. Batra, “The Enforcement of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses: its New Facet and Exclusion”, Vindobona J. Int’l. Comm. & Arb., vol. 15, nº 1, 2011
  • S.R. Garimella y N.A. Siddiqui, “The Enforcement of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses: Contemporary Judicial Opinion”, International Islamic University Malaysia L.J., vol. 24, nº 1, 2016, pp. 157-191 <file:///C:/Users/usuario/Downloads/228-885-1-PB.pdf
  • C.E. Menkel-Meadow, “Ethics in ADR: The Many ‘Cs’ of Professional Responsibility and Dispute Resolution”, Fordham Urb. L.J., vol. XXVIII, 2001, pp. 979-990 <http://scholarship.law. georgetown. edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1541&- context=facpub>
  • E. Gaillard, “Les manoeuvres dilatoires des parties et des arbitres dans l’arbitrage commercial international”, Rev. arb., 1990
  • A. Fré, “Delaying Tactics in Arbitration”, Disp. Res. J., vol. 59, nº 4, 2004-2005
  • J. Barbet y P. Rosher, “Les clauses de resolution de litiges optionnelles”, Rev. arb., 2010, nº 1
  • E. Palmer y E. López, “The Use of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in Latin America: Questions of Enforceability”, Am. Rev. Int’l Arb., vol. 14, 2003
  • Y.W. Li, “Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts: an Empirical Study”, Cornell International L.J., vol. 39, nº 3, 2006
  • K.M. Scanlon y K.A. Bryan, “Will the Next Generation of Dispute Resolution Clause Drafting include Model Arb-Med Clauses?, Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation: the Fordham Papers 2009 (A.W. Rovine, ed.), vol. 9, 2010
  • N. Beale, Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Contracts: A Global Guide, Zúrich, Schulthess, 2013
  • A. Hernández Rodríguez, “Los contratos internacionales de construcción ‘llave en mano’”, Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, vol. 6, nº 1, 2014
  • A. Connerty, “The Role of ADR in the Resolution of International Disputes”, Arb. Int’l, vol. 12, nº 1, 1997
  • H. Tsin, “Dispute Resolution Adviser System in Hong Kong - Design & Development”, Arbitration, vol. 63, nº 2, 1997
  • A. Hernández Rodríguez, “Los mecanismos alternativos de resolución de litigos (ADR) en el ámbito de los contratos internacionales de construcción”, Mediación, arbitraje y resolución extrajudicial de conflictos en el siglo XXI (L. García Villaluenga, J. Tomillo Urbina y E. Vázquez de Castro, coords.) vol. 2, Madrid, Reus, 2010
  • U. Draetta, “Dispute Resolution in International Construction Linked Contracts”, Int’l Bus. L.J., 2011
  • M. Bresnen y N. Marshall, “Partnering in Construction: A Critical Review of Issues, Problems and Dilemmas”, Construction Management and Economics, vol. 18, nº 7, 2000
  • P. Rosher, “Les contrats NEC3: ‘partnering’ avantages, inconvenients et adaptation en droit francais”, Revue de droit des affaires internationales, 2015, nº 4
  • P. Van Leynseele, “La ‘Med-Arb’ et ses dérivés. Plaidoyer pour un mode de résolution des conflits efficace”, Liber Amicorum Georges-Dal, Bruselas, Larcier, 2014
  • P. Fouchard, “Arbitrage et modes alternatives de règlement des litiges du commerce international”, Écrits: droit de l’arbitrage, droit du commerce international, París, Comité Français de l’Arbitrage, 2007
  • M. Virgós Soriano y C. Gual Grau, “La mediación como alternativa”, Actualidad Jurídica Uría Menéndez, nº 20, 2008, p. 22 <http://www.uria.com/documentos/publicaciones/2004/documento/articulo UM. pdf?id=3151>
  • M. Pryles, “Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses”, J. Int´l Arb., vol. 18, nº 2, 2001
  • E. Palmer y E. López, “The Use of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in Latin America: Questions of Enforceability”, Am. Rev. Int´l. Arb., vol. 14, nº 3, 2003
  • R. Jacob, “Should Mediation Trigger Arbitration in Multi-step Alternative Dispute Resolution Clauses?”, Am. Rev. Int’ Arb., vol. 15, nº 1, 2004
  • K.P. Berger, “Law and practice of escalation clauses”, Arb. Int’l, vol. 22, nº 1, 2006
  • D. Jones, “Dealing with Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Process”, Arbitration, vol. 75, nº 2, 2009
  • D. Kayali, “Enforceability of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses”, J. Int´l Arb., vol. 27, nº 6, 2010
  • G.B. Born, International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing, 4ª ed., Alphen aan den Rijn, Kluwer Law International, 2013
  • P. Friedland, Arbitration Clauses for International Contracts, 2ª ed., Hungtington (N.Y.), Jurisnet, 2007
  • P.F. Friedland y D. Nyer, “Drafting Arbitration Clauses Before and After Dispute”, Soft Law in International Arbitration (L.W. Newman y M.J. Radine, eds.), Hungtington (N.Y.), Jurisnet, 2014
  • B.M. Cremades, “Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses” (CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution 2004), report in (2003), ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, 14, nº1, 2003
  • B.M. Cremades Sanz-Pastor, “La buena fe en el arbitraje internacional”, Arbitraje. Revista de arbitraje comercial y de inversiones, vol. 5, nº 1, 2012
  • S. Chapman, “Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses: Enforcing Obligations to Negotiate in Good Faith”, J. Int’l Arb., vol. 27, nº 1, 2010
  • E. Kajkowska, “Enforceability of Multi-Step Resolution Clauses. An Overview of Selected European Jurisdictions”, Procedural Science at the Crossroads of Different Generations (L. Cadiet, B. Hess y M. Rquejo Isidro, eds..), Luxemburgo, Nomos, 2015
  • J. H. Carter, “Issues Arising from Integrated Dispute Resolution Clauses”, New Horizons in International Commercial Arbitration and Beyond (A,J, van den Berg, ed.), La Haya, Kluwer Law International, 2005
  • C. Macho Gómez, “Los ADR alternative dispute resolution en el comercio internacional”, Cuadernos de Derecho Transnaciona, vol. 5, nº 2, 2013
  • P. Hibberd y P. Newman, ADR and Adjudication In Construction Disputes, Oxford, Londres, Edimburgo, 1999
  • R. Goldscheider, “The Employment of Experts in Mediating and Arbitrating Intellectual Property Disputes”, Am. Rev. Int’l Arb., vol.6, nº.4, 1995
  • I. De Castro y S. Theurich, “Efficient Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) for Intellectual Property Disputes”, Handbook of European Intellectual Property Management, Kogan Page, 2009, pp. 479-485 http://www.wipo.int/export/sites/ www/amc/en/docs/euro.pdf
  • K.M.J. Harmon, “Effectiveness of Dispute Review Boards”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, november/december, 2003, pp. 674-679 <http://www.harmonyorkassociates.com/ Effectiveness%20of%20DRB.pdf>
  • J.C. Najar, “Le mini-trial: chimère ou panacée ?”, Droit et pratique du commerce international, vol. 14, 1988
  • J.J. Arnaldez, Y. Derains y D. Hascher (eds.), ICC Publication nº 553, 1997
  • T. Giovannini, “Qui controle les pouvoirs des arbitres: les parties, les arbitres ou la Cour d’arbitrage?”, Les arbitres internationaux, Société de Législation comparée, 2005
  • O. Krauss, “The Enforceability of Escalation Clauses Providing for Negotiations in Good Faith Under English law”, McGill Journal of Dispute Resolution, vol. 2, 201-2016
  • L. Flannery, “Emirates Trading, good faith, and pre-arbitral ADR clauses: a jurisdictional precondition?”, Arb. Int’l., vol. 31, nº 1 2015
  • S. Krennbauer, “Enforceability of Multi-tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in International Business Contracts”, Yearb. Int’l Arb., vol. 1, 2010
  • F. González de Cossío, “Mecanismos alternativos de solución de controversias, notas sobre el creciente desarrollo del área”, Ars Iuris, vol. 30, 2003 pp. 39-67, esp. p. 66 <https://works.bepress.com/ francisco_gonzalez_de_cossio/16/>
  • C. Jarrosson, “Observations on Poiré v. Tripier”, Arb. Int’l, vol. 19, nº 3, 2003
  • A. Jolles, “Consequences of Multi-tier Arbitration Clauses: Issues of Enforcement”, Arbitration, nº 72, 2006
  • F. Walther, “E-confidence in e-commerce durch Alternative Dispute Resolution”, Aktuelle Juristische Praxis, 7. 2001
  • D. Jiménez Figueres, “Multi-Tiered Disputes Resolution Clauses in ICC Arbitration”, ICC Int’l Arbitration Bull., vol. 14, nº 13, 2003
  • G. Pisacane, L. Murphy y C. Zhang, Arbitration in China. Rules & Perspectives, Singapur, Spinger
  • W.W. Park, “Lord Mustill and the Channel Tunnel Case”, Boston University School of Law, Public Law & Legal Theory Paper No. 15-25, 30 junio 2015, <http:// ssrn.com/abstract=2625036, o http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2625036>
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet