Evaluación y rediseño de la red pública educativaun análisis centralizado

Referencias bibliográficas

• Asmild, M.; Paradi, J.C. y Pastor, J.T. (2009), “Centralized Resource Allocation BCC Models”, Omega. The International Journal of Management Science, 37, 40–49.
• Athanassopoulos, A. D. (1995), “Goal Programming & Data Envelopment Analysis (GoDEA) for Target-Based Multi-Level Planning: Allocating Central Grants to the Greek Local Authorities”, European Journal of Operational Research, 87, 535–550.
• Bacdayan, A. W. (1997), “A Mathematical Analysis of the Learning Production Process and a Model for determinating What Matters In Education”, Economics of Education Review, 16(1), 25-37.
• Banker, R. D.; Charnes, A. y Cooper, W. W. (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
• Basley, J. E. (2003), “Allocating Fixed Costs and Revenues Via Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 198-216.
• Bates, J. (1997), “Measuring Predetermined Socioeconomic Inputs when assessing the Efficiency of Educational Outputs”, Applied Economics, 29, 85-93.
• Behn, R. (2003), “Why Measure Performance? Different purposes require different measures”, Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606. Bessent, A. M. y Bessent, E. W. (1980), “Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis”, Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 57-75.
• Bessent, A. M.; Bessent, E. W.; Kennington, J. y Reagan, B. (1982), “An Application of Mathematical Programming to Assess Productivity in the Houston Independent School District”, Management Science, 28(12), 1355-1367. Bifulco, R. y Bretscheneider, S. (2001), “Estimating School Efficiency. A Comparison of Methods Using Simulated Data”, Economics of Education Review, 20(5), 417-429.
• Blau, F. (1996). “Symposium on Primary and Secondary Education”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10(4), 3-8.
• Boussofiane, A.; Dyson, R. G. y Thanassoulis, E. (1991), “Applied Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 15(5), 1-15.
• Burgess, S. y Rato, M. (2003), “The Role of incentives in the Public Sector: Issues and Evidence”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19(2), 285-300.
• Cervini, R. A. (2009), “Class, School, Municipal, and State Effects on Mathematics Achievement in Argentina: A Multilevel Analysis”, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(3), 319–340.
• Coleman, J. S.; Campbell, E. Q. y Hobson, C. J. (1966), “Equality of Educational Opportunity”. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
• Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W. y Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
• Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W. y Rhodes, E. (1981), “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis to program follow through”, European Journal of Operational Research, 27(6), 668-697.
• Cooper, W. W.; Seiford, L. M. y Tone, K. (2006), Data Envelopment Analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver Software, Springer.
• Cordero, J. M.; Pedraja, F. y Salinas, J. (2008), “Measuring Efficiency in Education: An Analysis of Different Approaches for Incorporating Non-Discretionary Inputs”, Applied Economics, 36(10), 1323-1339.
• Cordero, J. M.; Pedraja, F. y Santín, D. (2009), “Alternative Approaches to Include Exogenous Variables in DEA Measures: A comparison using Monte Carlo”, Computers & Operations Research, 36(10), 2699-2706.
• Christensen, T. y Lægreid, P. (2008). “NPM and Beyond – Structure, Culture and Demography”, International Review of Administrative Science, 74, 7–23. De Witte, K.; Thanassoulis, E.; Simpson, G.; Battisti, G. y Charlesworth-May, A. (2010), “Assessing Pupil and School Performance by Non-Parametric and Parametric Techniques”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61 (8), 1224-1237.
• Debreu, G. (1951), “The Coefficient of Resource Utilization”, Econometrica, 19(3), 273-292.
• Deller, S. C. y Rudnicki, E. (1993), “Production Efficiency in Elementary Education. The Case of Maine Public School”, Economics of Education Review, 12(1), 45-57. Dewey, J.; Husted, T. y Kenny, L. (2000), “The Ineffectiveness of School Inputs: A Product of Missespecification?”, Economics of Education Review, 19, 27-45.
• Ehrenberg, R. G. y Bewer, D. J. (1994). “Do School and Teacher Characteristics Matter? Evidence from High School and Beyond”, Economics of Education Review, 13(1), 1-17.
• Elacqua, G., Schneider, M., y Buckley, J. (2006), “School choice in Chile: Is it class or the classroom?”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(3), 577–601.
• Fang, L. y Zhang, C. Q. (2008), “Resource Allocation Based on the DEA Model”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 1136–1141.
• Färe, R.; Grabowski, R.; Grosskopf, S. y Kraft, S. (1997), “Efficiency of a fixed but Allocatable Input: A Non-Parametric Approach”, Economic Letters, 56, 187-193.
• Färe, R.; Grosskopf, S.; Kerstens, K.; Kirkley, J. E. y Squires, D. (2000), “Assessing Short-Run and Medium-Run Fishing Capacity at the Industry Level and Its Reallocation”, in: Microbehavior and Macroresults: Proceedings of the Tenth Biennial Conference of the International Institute of Fisheries Economics and Trade (IIFET), July 10–14, 2000, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
• Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The measurement of Efficiency Productive”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Serie A, 120, 21-35.
• Gimenez-Garcia, V. M.; Martínez-Parra, J. L. y Buffa, F. P. (2007), “Improving Resource Utilization in Multi-Unit Networked Organizations: The Case of a Spanish Restaurant Chain”, Tourism Management, 28, 262–270.
• Golany, B.; Phillips, F. Y. y Rousseau, J. J. (1993), “Models for Improved Effectiveness Based on DEA Efficiency Results”, IIE Transactions, 25(6), 2-10.
• Golany, B. y Tamir, E. (1995), “Evaluating Efficiency-Effectiveness-Equality Trade-offs: a Data Envelopment Analysis approach”, Management Science, 41(7), 1172-1184.
• Goldstein, H. y Woodhouse, G. (2000), “School Effectiveness Research And Educational Policy”, Oxford Review of Education, 26(3), 353–363.
• Hanushek, E. A. (1971), “Teachers Characteristics and Gains in Student Achievement: Estimating Using Micro Data”, American Economic Review, 61(5), 280-288.
• Hanushek, E. A. (1986), “The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools”, Journal of Economics Literature, 90(5), 1184-1208.
• Heckman, J. J.; Heinrich, C. J. y Smith, J. A. (1997), “Assessing the performance of performance standars in public bureaucracies”, American Economic Review, 87(2), 389-395.
• Heinrich, C. J. y Marschke, G. (2009), “Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems”, working paper.
• Hood, C. (1995), “The New Public Management in the 1980’s: Variations on a theme”, Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2), 93-109.
• Ito, R.; Namatame, T. y Yamaguchi, T. (1999), “Resource Allocation Problem Based on the DEA Model”, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 42(2), 149-166.
• Jacob, B. A. (2005), “Accountability, incentives and behavior: Evidence from school reform in Chicago”, Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 761-796.
• Johnson, A. L. y Ruggiero, J. (2011), “Nonparametric Measurement of Productivity and Efficiency in Education”, Annals of Operations Research, forthcoming. DOI 10.1007/s10479-011-0880-9.
• Krueger, A. B. y Lindahl, M. (2001), “Education and Growth: why and for whom?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 1101-1136.
• Koopmans, T. C. (1951), “An analysis of Production as an efficient combination of activities” in Koopmans, T. C. (ed): Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph nº 13. New York: John Willey and Sons, Inc.
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010), “New Public Management for the Classical Continental European Administration: Modernization at the Local Level in Germany, France and Italy”, Public Administration, 88(4), 1116–1130.
• Kumar, C. K. y Sinha, B. K. (1999), “Efficiency Based Production Planning and Control Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research, 117, 450-469.
• Levin, H. (1974), “Measuring the efficiency in educational production”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2, 3-24.
• Li, S. K. y Ng, Y. Ch. (1995), “Measuring The Productive Efficiency of a Group of Firms”, International Advances in Economic Research, 1(4), 377–390.
• Li, X.Y. y Cui, J.C. (2008), “A Comprehensive DEA Approach for the Resource Allocation Problem based on Scale Economies Classification”, Journal of System Science & Complexity, 21(4), 540-557.
• López, G.; Puig-Junoy, J.; Ganuza, J. J. y Planas, I. (2003), “Els nous instruments de la gestió pública”, Col·lecció Estudis Econòmicos, La Caixa.
• Lozano, S. y Villa, G. (2004), “Centralized Resource Allocation Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22, 143–61.
• Lozano, S.; Villa, G. y Adenso-Díaz (2004), “Centralised Target Setting for Regional Recycling Operations Using DEA”, OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science, 32, 101-110.
• Lozano, S. y Villa, G. (2005), “Centralized DEA Models with the Possibility of Downsizing”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 357–364.
• Lozano, S.; Villa, G. y Braennlund, R. (2009), “Centralised Reallocation of Emission Permits using DEA”, European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 752-760.
• Lozano, S.; Villa, G. y Canca, D. (2011), “Application of Centralised DEA Approach to Capital Budgeting in Spanish Ports”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60, 455-465.
• Madaus, G. F.; Kellaghan, T.; Rakow, E. A. y King, D. J. (1979), “The Sensitivity of Measures of Schools Effectiveness”, Harvard Educational Review, 49(2), 207-230.
• Mancebón, M. J. y Mar Molinero, C. (2000), “Performance in primary schools”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 843-854.
• Mancebón, M. J. y Muñiz, M. (2007), “Private versus Public High Schools in Spain: Disentangling Managerial and Programme Efficiencies”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(7), 892-901.
• Mar-Molinero, C.; Prior, D.; Segovia, M. M. y Portillo, F. (2012), “On Centralized Resource Utilization and its Reallocation by using DEA”, Annals of Operations Research, DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1083-8.
• Mizala, A.; Romaguera, P. y Farren, D (2002), “The technical efficiency of schools in Chile”, Applied Economics, 34(12), 1533-1552.
• Muñiz, M. (2002), “Separating Managerial Inefficiency and External Conditions in Data”, European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 625-643.
• Muñiz, M.; Paradi, J.; Ruggiero, J. y Yang, Z. (2006), “Evaluating Alternative DEA Models used to Control for Non-Discretionary Inputs”, Computers and Operations Research, 33, 1173-1183.
• Murphy, J.; Hallinger, P. H. y Mesa, R. (1985), “School Effectiveness: Checking Progress and Assumptions and Developing a Role for State and Federal Government”, Teachers College Record, 86(4), 615-641.
• Nesterenko, V. y Zelenyuk, V. (2007), “Measuring Potential Gains From Reallocation of Resources”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28, 107–116.
• Noulas, A. y Ketkar, K. (1998), “Efficient Utilization of Resources in Public Schools: a case study of New Jersey”, Applied Economics, 30, 1299-1306.
• Opdenakker, M. C. y Van Damme, J. (2001), “Relationship between School Composition and Characteristics of School Process and their Effect on Mathematics Achievement”, British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 407–432.
• Ortún, V. (1992), “Gestión Pública”, Centro de Estudios sobre Economía del Sector Público, Fundación BBV.
• Ouellette, P. y Vierstraete, V. (2005), “An Evaluation of the Efficiency of Québec School Boards using Data Envelopment Analysis Method”, Applied Economics, 37(14), 1643-1653.
• Ouellette, P. y Vierstraete, V. (2010), “Malmquist Indexes with Quasi-fixed Inputs: An Application to School Districts in Québec”, Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 57-76.
• Pepin, B. (1999), “Mobility of Mathematics Teachers across England, France and Germany”, European Educational Researcher, 5(1), 5-15.
• Pérez, G.; Ortiz, D.; Zafra, J. L. y Alcaide, L. (2011), “De la New Public Management a la Post New Public Management, evolución de las reformas en la gestión de las administraciones públicas españolas”, Revista de Contabilidad y Dirección, 13, 129-150.
• Phillips, M. (1997), “What Makes Schools Effective? A Comparison of the Relationships of Communitarian Climate and Academic Climate to Mathematics Achievement and Attendance During Middle School”, American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 633–662.
• Pollitt, C. (2009), “Bureaucracies Remember, Post-Bureaucratic Organizations Forget?” Public Administration, 87(2), 198–218.
• Ray, S. C. (1991), “Resource use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connecticut Data”, Management Science, 37(12), 1620-1628.
• Roderick, M.; Jacob, B. A. y Bryk, A. S. (2002), “The impact of high-stakes testing in Chicago on student achievement in the promotional gate grades”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(4), 333-357.
• Ruggiero, J. (1998), “Non-Discretionary Inputs in Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 461-469.
• Ruggiero, J.; Duncombe, W. y Miner, J. (1995), “On the Measurement and Causes of Technical Inefficiency in Local Public Services: With an Application to Public Education”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(4), 403-428.
• Silva-Portela, M. C. A. y Camacho, A. S. (2010), “Analysis of Complementary Methodologies for the Estimation of School Value Added”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(7), 1122-1132.
• Silva-Portela, M. C. A. y Thanassoulis, E. (2001), “Decomposing School and SchoolType Efficiency”, European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 357-373.
• Smith, P. y Mayston, D. (1987), “Measuring Efficiency in the Public Sector”, OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, 15(3), 181-189.
• Thanassoulis, E. (1993), “A Comparison of Regression Analysis and Data Envelopment Analysis as Alternative Methods for Assessing Performance”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 44, 1129-1145.
• Thanassoulis, E. (1999), “Setting Achievements Targets for School Children”, Education Economics, 7(2), 101-119.
• Thanassoulis, E. y Dunstan, P. (1994), “Guiding Schools to Improved Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Illustration with Data from Local Education Authority”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(11), 1247-1262.
• Thanassoulis, E. y Silva Portela, M. C. A. (2002), “School Outcomes: Sharing the Responsability between Pupil and School”, Education Economics, 10(2), 183-207.
• Thieme, C.; Prior, D. y Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2011), “A Multilevel Decomposition of School Performance Using Robust Nonparametric Frontier”, Working Paper.
• Walker, R. M. y Boyne, G. A. (2006), “Public Management Reform and Organizational Performance: An empirical assessment of the U.K. Labour government’s public service improvement strategy”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(2), 371-393.
• Wilcoxon, F. (1945), “Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods”, Biometrics 1, 80-83.
• Wu, J. y An, Q.X. (2012), “New Approaches for Resource Allocation via DEA Models”, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(1), 103-117.