"Living by Wit" and "Knight of Industry"some Notes on the History in Two Dead Metaphors

  1. Sell, Jonathan P. A.
Revista:
Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos

ISSN: 0210-6124

Año de publicación: 2015

Volumen: 37

Número: 1

Páginas: 121-138

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Atlantis: Revista de la Asociación Española de Estudios Anglo-Norteamericanos

Resumen

Este trabajo propone que la historia de dos metáforas muertas, una (�living by wit�) un cliché aún vigente, la otra (�knight of industry�) un apodo ya obsoleto, está cargada de aspectos relacionados con la historia social de los conceptos wit e industry, de variable fortuna. En particular, se sugiere que el declive de wit se debió, entre otros factores, a una desconfianza científica de la metáfora, una desconfianza protestante y burguesa del caballero ingenioso, y un desdén aristocrático por el ingenio laborioso que alimentaba los talleres y fábricas de los mecánicos e ingenieros de clase media. A través del uso del cliché y del apodo, respectivamente, dos novelas tan diferentes como Robinson Crusoe (1719) de Daniel Defoe y Little Dorrit (1857) de Charles Dickens arrojan luz sobre dos momentos en esa historia. El trabajo concluye que, una vez fosilizadas en los textos literarios, incluso las metáforas más muertas pueden restaurar a la vida aspectos de la historia en general y de la suya propia, en particular.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Blackmore, Richard. (1716) 1946. Essay upon Wit, with Commentary by Joseph Addison (Freeholder, No. 46, 1716). Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P. Project Gutenberg. http:// www.gutenberg.net/1/3/4/8/13484.
  • Boys, Richard C. 1946. “Introduction.” In Essay upon Wit, with Commentary by Joseph Addison (Freeholder, No. 46, 1716), by Sir Richard Blackmore. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P. Project Gutenberg. http://www.gutenberg.net/1/3/4/8/13484.
  • Carew, Thomas. (1633) 1999. “An Elegy upon the Death of the Dean of Paul’s, Dr. John Donne.” In English Renaissance Literary Criticism. Edited by Brian Vickers, 554- 7. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Defoe, Daniel. (1719) 2001. Robinson Crusoe. Edited by John Richetti. London: Penguin.
  • Dickens, Charles. (1857) 1985. Little Dorrit. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Dryden, John. (1693) 1800. Discourse on the Origin and Progress of Satire. In The Critical and Miscellaneous Prose Works of John Dryden. Vol. 3. Edited by Edmond Malone, 171-225. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies.
  • Eliot, Thomas Stearns. (1921) 1966. “The Metaphysical Poets.” In Selected Essays, 281- 91. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Etherege, George. (1688) 1888. She Wou’d if she Cou’d. In The Works of Sir George Etherege: Plays and Poems. Edited by A. W. Verity. London: John. C. Nimmo.
  • Farquhar, George. (1698) 1892. Love and a Bottle. In The Dramatic Works of George Farquhar. 2 vols. Edited by Alexander Charles Ewald. London: John C. Nimmo.
  • Guazzo, Stefano. (1581) 1738. The Art of Conversation. 4 bks. Translated by George Pettie, bks. 1-3, and Bartholomew Young, bk. 4. London: J. Brett.
  • Herbert, Christopher. 2002. “Filthy Lucre: Victorian Ideas of Money.” Victorian Studies 44 (2): 185-213.
  • Hidalgo-Serna, Emilio. 1998. “Estudio introductorio. La elocución y El arte retórica de Vives.” In Juan Luis Vives. El arte retórica, edited by Ana Isabel Camacho Rubí, vii-xlix. Barcelona: Anthropos.
  • Hobbes, Thomas. (1651) 1996. Leviathan. Edited by J. C. A. Gaskin. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Hooker, Edward N. 1946. “Introduction.” In Richard Flecknoe and Joseph Warton, Essays on Wit No. 2. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P. Project Gutenberg. http://www. gutenberg.net/1/4/9/7/14973/.
  • Hulse, Clarke. 2000. “Tudor Aesthetics.” In The Cambridge Companion to English Literature 1500-1600, edited by Arthur F. Kinney, 29-63. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Jack, Ian. 1978. Augustan Satire. Intention and Idiom in English Poetry 1660-1750. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Johnson, Samuel. (1779) 1952. “Life of Cowley.” In Samuel Johnson. Rasselas, Poems, and Selected Prose. Edited by Bertrand H. Bronson, 353-65. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
  • Kovesces, Zoltan. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Kovesces, Zoltan. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: Chicago UP.
  • Leavis, Frank Raymond. (1936) 1964. Revaluation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Locke, John. (1698) 1993. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by John W. Yolton. London: J. M. Dent.
  • Lund, Roger D. 2012. Ridicule, Religion and the Politics of Wit in Augustan England. Farnham and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Marx, Karl. (1867) 1990. Capital. Volume 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin.
  • McKeon, Michael. 2002. The Origins of the English Novel 1600-1740. (Fifteenth Anniversary Edition with a New Introduction by the Author). Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins UP.
  • Milburn, Daniel Judson. 1966. The Age of Wit, 1650-1750. New York: Macmillan.
  • Montrose, Louis A. 1983. “Of Gentlemen and Shepherds: The Politics of Elizabethan Pastoral Form.” English Literary History 50 (3): 415-59.
  • Oldmixon, John. (1728) 1964. An Essay on Criticism. Edited by R. J. Madden. Los Angeles, CA: U of California P.
  • Oxford English Dictionary (1971) 1979. The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary. 2 vols. London: Book Club Associates.
  • Parker, Blanford. 1998. The Triumph of Augustan Poetics: English Literary Culture from Butler to Johnson. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Patterson, Annabel M. 1984. Censorship and Interpretation. The Condition of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. Madison: U of Wisconsin P.
  • Peacham, Henry. (1593) 1996. The Garden of Eloquence. Edited by Beate-Maria Koll. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
  • Platt, Peter G. 2009. Shakespeare and the Culture of Paradox. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Pope, Alexander. (1711) 1963. “An Essay on Criticism.” In The Poems of Alexander Pope. Edited by John Butt, 143-68. London: Methuen.
  • Puttenham, George. (1589) 1970. The Arte of English Poesie. Edited by Gladys Willcock and Alice Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Redford, John. (1561) 1848. The Moral Play of Wit and Science. Edited by James Orchard Halliwell. London: Shakespeare Society. Russell, Donald A. 1981. Criticism in Antiquity. London: Duckworth.
  • Russell, Norman. 1986. The Novelist and Mammon. Literary Responses to the World of Commerce in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Sell, Jonathan P. A. 2006. Rhetoric and Wonder in English Travel Writing, 1560-1613. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Shelston, Alan, ed. 1985. Dickens: Dombey and Son and Little Dorrit. A Casebook. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Sidney, Philip. (1595) 1973. An Apology for Poetry. Edited by Geoffrey Shepherd. Manchester: Manchester UP.
  • Sitter, John. 1991. Arguments of Augustan Wit. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Smiles, Samuel. (1859) 2002. Self-Help. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  • Uglow, Jenny. 2002. The Lunar Men: The Friends Who Made the World. London: Faber and Faber.
  • Virgil? n.d. “Elegiae in Maecenatem.” Appendix Vergilianum. http://www. forumromanum.org/literature/elegiae_maecenatem.html.
  • Wiener, Martin J. 2004. English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850- 1980. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge UP
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet