(In(ter))discipline: the case of egyptology

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aikhenvald, A.Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Alberti, B. & Y. Marshall. 2009. Animating archaeology: Local theories and conceptually openended methodologies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19/3: 344–356.
• Arp, J. 2013. “WYSIWYG. (Un-)Gewissheiten und die altägyptische funeräre Praxis”, in G. Neunert, K. Gabler and A. Verbovsek (eds.), Nekropolen: Grab – Bild – Ritual (Münchner Arbeitskreises Junge Aegyptologie 2; Göttinger Orientforschungen IV/54). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 25-44.
• Assmann, J. 1974. “Der literarische Text im Alten Ägypten”, Orientalistiche Literaturzeitung 69: 117-126.
• Bacon, F. 1898, Novum Organum or True Suggestions for the Interpretation of Nature. London and New York: MacMillan [1620: 1st edition in Latin].
• Baines, J. (ed.). 1976. Royal Anthropological Institute News 15 (Special issue on Ancient Egypt). London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
• Baines, J. 1985. “Colour terminology and colour classification: Ancient Egyptian colour terminology and polychromy”, American Anthropologist N.S. 87/2: 282-297.
• Bal, M. 2018. “Towards a relational inter-temporality”, in E. Wittocx et al. (eds.), The transhistorical museum. Valiz: Vis-à-vis, 50-63.
• Berlin, B. & P. Kay. 1969. Basic colour terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Bickel, S. et al. (eds.). 2013. Ägyptologen und Ägyptologien zwischen Kaiserreich und Gründung der beiden deutschen Staaten (Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache Beihefte 1). Berlin: De Gruyter.
• Björkmann, G. 1964. “Egyptology and historical method”, Orientalia Suecana 13: 9-33.
• Bohas, G. 1997. Matrices, étymons, racines : Éléments d’une théorie lexicologique du vocabulaire arabe (Orbis Supplementa 8). Leuven: Peeters.
• Brewer, D.J. 2001. “Review of Anthropology and Egyptology: a developing dialogue, edited by J. Lustig”, JNES, 60/ 3: 200-201.
• Brunner-Traut, E. 1996. Frühformen des Erkennens: Aspektive im Alten Ägypten. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
• Bury, J.B. 1920. The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into Its Origin and Growth. London: MacMillan.
• Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian linguistics. New York: Harper & Row.
• Comrie, B. 2015. “Preface”, in E. Grossman, M. Haspelmath and T.S. Richter (eds.), EgyptianCoptic linguistics in typological perspective (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 55). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015, v-vii.
• Derchain, Ph. 1993. “Tartufe ou les plumes du paon ?”, Göttinger Miszellen 136 : 27-28.
• Descartes, P. 1637. Discours de la méthode. Leiden: Maire.
• Dixon, R.M.W. 2011. I am a linguist. Leiden: Brill.
• Doxey, D. 2006. “Review of Society and death in Ancient Egypt: mortuary landscapes of the Middle Kingdom, by Janet Richards”, Religious Studies Review 32/1, 2006, 37.
• Evans, R.J. 1997. In defence of history. London: Granta (reprint 2018).
• Fontana, J. 1982. Historia: análisis del pasado y proyecto social. Barcelona: Crítica.
• Frankfort, H. 1948. Ancient Egyptian religion: An interpretation. New York.
• Gange, D. 2014. “Interdisciplinary measures: Beyond disciplinary histories of Egyptology”, in W. Carruthers (ed.), Histories of Egyptology: Disciplinary measures (Routledge Studies in Egyptology 2). Routledge: New York, 64-77.
• Gange, D. 2016. “A Great Reception? The Past & Future of the History of Egyptology”, in Birmingham Egyptology Symposium 3. Birmingham.
• Gardiner, A.H. 1947. Ancient Egyptian onomastica I-III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gardiner, A.H. 1957. Egyptian grammar. Oxford: Griffith Institute (1st ed. 1927).
• Gautier, P.A. 1997. “Le rouge et le vert : sémiologie de la couleur en Égypte ancienne”, Archéo-Nil 7 : 9–15.
• Gee, J. 2010. “Egyptologists’ fallacies: fallacies arising from limited evidence”, Journal of Egyptian History 3: 137-158.
• Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Gertzen, Th.L. 2017. Einführung in die Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Ägyptologie. Münster: LIT.
• Geus, K. 2016. “Paradoxography and Geography in Antiquity: some thoughts about the Paradoxographus Vaticanus”, in F.J. González Ponce, F.J. Gómez Espelosín y A.L. Chávez Reino (eds.), La letra y la carta: descripción verbal y representación gráfica en los diseños terrestres grecolatinos; Estudios en honor de Pietro Janni (Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla y Universidad de Alcalá), 243-257.
• Golénischeff, V. 1882. “Notice sur un ostracon hiératique du Musée de Florence”, Recueil de Travaux 3 : 3-7.
• Gracia Zamacona, C. 2013. “A database for the Coffin Texts”, in S. Polis y J. Winand (eds.), Texts, languages and information technology in Egyptology (Aegyptiaca Leodiensia 9). Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège, 139-155.
• Gracia Zamacona, C. 2015. “The two inner directions of the ancient Egyptian script”, The Birmingham Egyptology Journal 3: 9-23.
• Griffith, F.Ll. 1889. “The sign papyrus”, in W.M.F. Petrie (ed.), Two hieroglyphic papyri from Tanis. (Archaeological Survey of Egypt Extra Memoir). London: EEF.
• Griffith, F.Ll. 1898. A collection of hieroglyphs: A contribution to the study of Egyptian writing (Archaeological Survey of Egypt 6). London: EEF.
• Grossman, E., M. Haspelmath y T.S. Richter (eds.). 2015. Egyptian-Coptic language in typological perspective (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 55). Berlin: De Gruyter.
• Gumbrecht, H.U. 1996. “Does Egyptology need a “theory of literature”?”, Revista Brasileira de Literatura Comparada 3, 9-22.
• Haeny, G. 1974. “Ägyptologie: Ein offener Brief”, Göttinger Miszellen 9: 53-62.
• Harris, J.R. 1961. Lexicographical studies in ancient Egyptian minerals (Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin Institut für Orientforschung 54). Berlin: Akademie.
• Haspelmath, M. 1998. “Rev. of R. M. W. Dixon: The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, vi-f 169pp.”, Linguistics 36/5, 1001-1006.
• Haspelmath, M. 2013. “Peer selection vs. “peer review””, Diversity Linguistics Comment http://dlc.hypotheses.org/545 [accessed on 01.06.2015].
• Heisenberg, W. 1927. “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quantentheoretischen Kinematik und Mechanik”, Zeitschrift für Physik 43/3–4 (1927): 172–198.
• Helmholtz, H. 1859. “Ueber Farbenblindheit”, Verhandlungen des naturhistorisch-medicinischen Vereins zu Heidelberg 2, 1-3.
• Henare, A., M. Holbraad & S. Wastell. 2007. “Introduction: Thinking through things”, in A. Henare, M. Holbraad and S. Wastell (eds.), Thinking through Things. Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically. London & New York: Routledge, 1–31.
• Holbraad, M. 2012. Truth in motion: The recursive anthropology of Cuban divination. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
• Holbrook, J.B. 2017. “Peer Review, Interdisciplinarity, and Serendipity”, in R. Frodeman (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 485-497.
• Hornung, E. 1971. Der Eine und die Vielen: Altägyptische Gottesvorstellungen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
• Howley & R. Nyord (eds.). 2018. Egyptology and Anthropology. Historiography, Theoretical Exchange and Conceptual Development: Proceedings of the Lady Wallis Budge Symposium held at the University of Cambridge, 25-26 July 2017 (Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections 17). Tucson: University of Arizona.
• Jansen-Winkeln, K. 1996. ““Horizont” und “Verklärtheit”: zur Bedeutung der Wurzel Ax”, Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur 23: 201-216.
• Jay, J. 2010. “Parallelism in the correspondence between Senwosret I and Sinuhe”, Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur 39: 165-189.
• Józefów, B. & J. Popielska-Grzybowska. 2009. “Preliminary remarks on the rites of passage in the Pyramid Texts”, in J. Popielska-Grzybowska & J. Iwaszczuk (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Central European Conference of Egyptologists; Egypt 2009: Perspectives of Research. Pułtusk 22-24 June 2009 (Acta Archaeologica Pultuskiensia 2). Pułtusk: Pułtusk Academy of Humanities, 75-82.
• Kitchen, K.A. 1998. “The curse of publication and the blight of novelty”, in C.J. Eyre (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Egyptologists; Cambridge, 3-9 September 1995 (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 85). Leuven: Peeters, 625-630.
• Kraemer, B. & K. Liszka. 2016. “Evidence for Administration of the Nubian Fortresses in the Late Middle Kingdom: The Semna Dispatches”, Journal of Egyptian History 9: 1-65.
• Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Larousserie, D. & C. Frammery. 2017. “Les chercheurs obligés de publier toujours plus”, Le Monde (26.09.2017).
• Lea, M.R. & B.V. Street. 1998. “Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach”, Studies in Higher Education 23: 157-172.
• Loprieno, A. 2001. La pensée et l’écriture. Paris: Cybèle.
• Loprieno, A. 2003. “Interdisziplinarität und Transdisziplinarität in der heutigen Ägyptologie”, in T. Hofmann y A. Sturm (eds.), Menschenbilder – Bildermenschen: Kunst und Kultur im Alten Ägypten, Norderstedt: Books on Demand, 227-240.
• Lustig, J. (ed.). 1997. Anthropology and Egyptology: A developing dialogue. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
• MacGregor, A. 2007. “Forming an identity: The early Society and its context, 1707-51”, in S. Pearce (ed.), Visions of antiquity: The Society of Antiquaries of London 1707-2007 (Archaeologia 111). London: The Society of Antiquaries of London, 45-73.
• Martin, A.M. 2013. Archaeology beyond postmodernity: A science of the social. Plymouth: Altamira Press.
• Martinet, A. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: Francke.
• Meeks, D. 2015. “Linguistique et égyptologie : entre théorisation à priori et contribution à l’étude de la culture égyptienne”, Chronique d’Égypte 90 : 40-67.
• Meskell, L. 1999. “Review of Anthropology and Egyptology: a developing dialogue, edited by J. Lustig”, American Journal of Archaeology, 103/1: 127-129.
• Moreno García, J.C. 2014. “The Cursed discipline? The peculiarities of Egyptology at the turn of the twenty-first century”, in W. Carruthers (ed.), Histories of Egyptology: Interdisciplinary Measures, Routledge Studies in Egyptology 2. New York: Routledge, 50-63.
• Moreno García, J.C. 2015. “Un mito tenaz: el Egipto antiguo o el paraíso perdido en la obra de los egiptólogos de finales del siglo XIX y comienzos del siglo XX”, in R. Da Riva and J. Vidal (eds.), Descubriendo el antiguo oriente: pioneros y arqueólogos de Mesopotamia y Egipto a finales del siglo XIX y principios del siglo XX, Barcelona: Bellaterra, 103-122.
• Moreschini, C. 2016. Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2016.06.14 on A. Marmodoro & B.D. Prince (eds.), Causation and creation in late antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).
• Nünning, A. (ed.). 2008. Metzler Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie. Stuttgart and Weimar: Metzler.
• Nyord, R. 2012. “On (mis)conceptions of the body in ancient Egypt”, Lingua Aegyptia 20: 165– 184.
• Nyord, R. 2013. “Vision and conceptualization in ancient Egyptian art”, in R. Caballero and J. E. Díaz Vera (eds.), Sensuous Cognition: Explorations into Human Sentience; Imagination, (E)motion and Perception. Berlin: De Gruyter, 135-168.
• Nyord, R. 2014. “Concluding Remarks on a Recent Debate about Conceptions of the Body and how to Study them”, Lingua Aegyptia 22: 177–182.
• Nyord, R. 2015. “Cognitive Linguistics”, in J. Stauder-Porchet, A. Stauder and W. Wendrich (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles.
• Nyord, R. 2018. ““Taking ancient Egyptian mortuary religion seriously”: Why would we, and how could we?”, Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections 17: 73–87.
• Nyord, R. (ed.). 2019. Concepts in Middle Kingdom Funerary Culture: Proceedings of the Lady Wallis Budge Anniversary Symposium Held at Christ’s College, Cambridge, 22 January 2016 (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East 102). Leiden: Brill, 2019.
• Ostwald, W. 1921. Die Farbenlehre. Leipzig: Unesma.
• Otto, B.-Ch. 2013. “Zauberhaftes Ägypten – Ägyptischer Zauber? Überlegungen zur Verwendung des Magiebegriffs in der Ägyptologie”, in F. Jeserich (ed.), Ägypten – Kindheit – Tod: Gedenkschrift für Edmund Hermsen. Vienna: Böhlau, 39-70.
• Pagel, M. 2012. Wired for culture. New York: Norton.
• Paltridge, B. 2017. The Discourse of Peer Review: Reviewing Submissions to Academic Journals. Palgrave MacMillan: London.
• Parkinson, R. 2009. Reading Ancient Egyptian poetry: Among other histories. Chichester & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Parkinson, R. 2013. “Sailing past Elsinore: interpreting the materiality of Middle Kingdom poetry”, in G. Moers et al. (eds.), Dating Egyptian literary texts (Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 11). Hamburg: Widmaier, 123-137.
• Pedersen, M.A. 2011. Not quite shamans: Spirit worlds and political lives in northern Mongolia. Ithaca.
• Petkov, J. 2014. Child and infant burials in New Kingdom Egypt: a Gurob case study (MA thesis). Clayton: Monash University.
• Pike, K. 1954. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. The Hague: Mouton.
• Polis, S. & S. Rosmorduc. 2015. “The hieroglyphic sign functions: suggestions for a revised taxonomy”, in H. Amstutz et al. (eds.), Fuzzy boundaries: Festschrift für Antonio Loprieno. Hamburg: Widmaier, vol. I, 149-174.
• Posener, G. 1962. “Histoire et Égypte ancienne”, Annales : Économies, Sociétés, Civilisations 17/4: 631-646.
• Price, Th.R. 1883. “The colour-system of Vergil”, The American Journal of Philology 4: 1-20.
• Quack, J.F. 2013. “Irrungen, Wirrungen? Forscherische Ansätze zur Datierung der älteren ägyptischen Literatur”, in G. Moers et al. (eds.), Dating Egyptian literary texts (Lingua Aegyptia Studia Monographica 11). Hamburg: Widmaier, 405-469.
• Ramón y Cajal, S. 2017. Reglas y consejos sobre investigación científica. Madrid: CSIC (1st ed. 1898).
• Ramses Online. 2015. ramses.ulg.ac.be
• Roeder, H. 2013. “Einleitung: Die altägyptische Nekropole als sakraler Raum: Zur kulturwissenschaftlichen Erschließung einer Funerärkultur”, in G. Neunert, K. Gabler and A. Verbovsek (eds.), Nekropolen: Grab – Bild – Ritual (Münchner Arbeitskreises Junge Aegyptologie 2; Göttinger Orientforschungen IV/54). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 9-23.
• Roquet, G. 1973. “Espace et lexique du sacré : autour du nom du ‛ciel’ en vieux nubien”, Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 73 : 155-176.
• Russell, L. 2014. ‘Mind forg’d manacles’: how can we think our way out of the conceptual straightjacket? (http://journal.antiquity.ac.uk/antplus/tag/ant-lecture-2014).
• Schenkel, W. 1963. “Die Farben in ägyptischer Kunst und Sprache”, Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache 88: 131-147.
• Schenkel, W. 1982. “Eine Konkordanz zu den altägyptischen Sargtexten”, in J. Leclant (ed.), L’Égyptologie en 1979, Paris, II, 45-53.
• Schenkel, W. 2007. “Color terms in ancient Egyptian and Coptic”, in R.E. MacLaury et al. (eds.), Anthropology of color: Interdisciplinary multilevel modeling. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 211-228.
• Schenkel, W. 2019. “Colours as viewed by the ancient Egyptians and the explanation of this view as seen by academics studying colour”, in Sh. Thavapalan & D.A. Warburton (eds.), The value of colour: Material and economic aspects in the ancient world (Berlin Studies of the Ancient World 70). Berlin: Topoi Excellence Cluster, 35-54.
• Schneider Th. & P. Raulwing (eds.). 2013. Egyptology from the First World War to the Third Reich: Ideology, scholarship and individual biographies. Leiden: Brill.
• Scott, M.W. 2013. “The Anthropology of Ontology (Religious Science?)”, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 19: 859–872.
• Ségalen, V. 1978. Essai sur l'exotisme. Montpellier: Fata Morgana.
• Sinclair, A. 1998. “Review of Anthropology and Egyptology: a developing dialogue, edited by J. Lustig”, Antiquity 72: 442.
• Smith, L. 2012. All heritage is intangible: Critical heritage studies and museums. Amsterdam: Reinwardt Academy.
• Smith, M.E. 2017. Why anthropology is too narrow an intellectual context for archaeology. anthropologies: a collaborative online project (http://www.anthropologiesproject.org /2011/05/why-anthropology-is-too-narrow.html).
• Spencer, A.J. 2009. “On publication”, British Museum Studies in Ancient Egypt and Sudan 12: 93- 98.
• Taylor, P. 2011. “Henri Frankfort, Aby Warburg and ‘Mythopoeic Thought’”, Journal of Art Historiography 5: 1-16.
• Theis, Ch. 2015. “Wenn Archäologie und Philologie nicht harmonieren: Magische Ziegel, ihre Nischen und Totenbuchspruch 151d–g”, Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 142: 85-95.
• Thesaurus Linguae Aegyptiae. 2014. (aaew.bbaw.de/tla/index).
• Totenbuch Projekt. 1994. (totenbuch.awk.nrw.de).
• Verbovsek, A. 2011. “Das Ende der Kunst? Kulturwissenschftliche Perspektivierungen der ägyptologischen Kunstwissenschaft”, in A. Verbovsek, B. Backes and C. Jones (eds.), Methodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie: Herausforderungen eines kulturwissenschaftlichen Paradigmenwechsels in den Altertumswissenschaften. Munich: Fink, 374-381.
• Vernus, P. 2013. “Égyptologie : une discipline aux prises avec l’exceptionnelle valorisation sociétale de son objet”, in S. Bickel et al. (eds), Ägyptologen und Ägyptologien zwischen Kaiserreich und Gründung der beiden deutschen Staaten, Berlin: De Gruyter, 457-480.
• Viveiros de Castro, E. 1998. “Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism”, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4/3: 469–488.
• Viveiros de Castro, E. 2004. “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation”, Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2: 3–22.
• Warburton, D.A. 2008. “The theoretical implications of ancient Egyptian colour vocabulary for anthropological and cognitive theory”, Lingua Aegyptia 16: 213-259.
• Weeks, K.R. (ed.). 1979. Egyptology and the social sciences: five studies. Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press.
• Winand, J. 1993. “De la perversité des comptes-rendus”, Göttinger Miszellen 134: 111.
• Winand, J. 2015. “De la perversité des compte rendus – suite (et sans doute pas fin) : Petit billet d’humeur”, Academia.edu (https://tinyurl.com/y43lthah).
• Young, Th. 1802. “Bakerian Lecture: On the Theory of Light and Colours”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 92: 12-48.