El Exiliode la punición doméstica a la punición estatal

  1. Juan Antonio Bueno Delgado
Revista:
Revista General de Derecho Romano

ISSN: 1697-3046

Any de publicació: 2015

Número: 24

Tipus: Article

Altres publicacions en: Revista General de Derecho Romano

Resum

The oldest form of exile we know in ancient Rome must be placed in primitive Roman society or rather in the family and the gens, not exactly in the public law. Only later was exile gradually understood as a legal punishment, graduated into different levels according to the seriousness of the punishable behaviour. The link between the punishment within the family and the criminal view of exile as a punishment is a not well known figure based on the coercive power of magistrates: the interdictio aquae et igni. When the political power became A guarantee of rights and liberties of the individual and the exile appears as a consequence of a legal procedure that culminates with a condemnatory sentence, in such a moment the exile ceased being an individual way to dodge a condemnation and became an actual punishment. From this moment on indeed both the interdictio aquae et igni and the other forms of exile (relegatio, deportatio) co-existed.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • COROMINAS, J. y PASCUAL, J. A.; Diccionario crítico etimológico castellano e hispánico, voz salir, Madrid 1986
  • GUTIERREZ-ALVIZ, F.; Diccionario de Derecho romano, voz ius exsilii, Madrid 1982
  • SABATINI, G.; Esilio, en NDI, Torino 1960, p. 850
  • KLEINFELLER, G.; s. v. "exilium", en PWRE, VI, 2, Stuttgart 1909, cols. 1683 ss.
  • RICH, A.; Exsilium, en Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities, London 1875.
  • PUIG PEÑA, F.; Destierro, en NEJ, Barcelona 1980.
  • CRIFÒ, G.; Ricerche sull’exilium nel periodo repubblicano, Milano 1961
  • HUGUET, El régimen jurídico del domicilio en Derecho romano, Madrid 2008.
  • HUGUET, “Un análisis de los efectos jurídicos del exilium y la interdictio aquae et ignis desde sus orígenes hasta la época imperial con especial referencia a su incidencia sobre la libertad domiciliaria”, en RGDR 10 (2008).
  • MOMMSEN, T.; Römisches Strafrecht, Leipzig, 1899.
  • Fernand DE VISSCHER, La politica romana del diritto di cittadinanza, en Annali della facoltà de giurisprudenza dell’università di Genova, II, I, 1963, pp. 5-17
  • Fernand DE VISSCHER, La cittadinanza romana, en Annali del seminario giuridico dell’Università di Catania, III, 1949, pp.1-17
  • Fernand DE VISSCHER, Le statut juridique des nouveaux citoyens romains et l’inscription de Rhosos, en Nouvelle Études de droit romain public et privé, Milano 1949, pp. 51 ss.
  • Fernand DE VISSCHER, La dualité des droit de cité dans le monde romain d’après une nouvelle interprétation de l’édit III d’Auguste découvert à Cirène, en Nouvelle Études de droit romain public et privé, Milano 1949, pp.101 ss.
  • Fernand DE VISSCHER, Les édits d’Auguste découverts à Cirene, Paris-Louvain 1940.
  • ARANGIO-RUIZ, V.; “Sul problema della doppia cittadinanza nella Repubblica e nell’Impero Romano”, en Scritti giuridici in onore di Francesco Carnelutti, I, 1950, pp. 54-77.
  • NIEBUHR, B. G.; Römische Geschichte, Berlín 1830.