Transdisciplinary integration and its implementation in primary education through two STEAM projects

Références bibliographiques

• Aróstegui, J. L. (2020). Implications of neoliberalism and knowledge economy for music education. Music Education Research, 22(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2019.1703923 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Bautista, A., Tan, L. S., Ponnusamy, L. D., & Yau, X. (2016). Curriculum integration in arts education: Connecting multiple art forms through the idea of ‘space’. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 610–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1089940 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Burger, P., & Kamber, R. (2003). Cognitive integration in transdisciplinary science. Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 43–73. http://edoc.unibas.ch/dok/A6329135 [Google Scholar]
• Burnard, P., & Colucci-Gray, L. (2020). Why science and art creativities matter. (Re- configuring STEAM for future-making education). Brill/Sense Publishers. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Chalmers, C., Carter, M. L., Cooper, T., & Nason, R. (2017). Implementing “big ideas” to advance the teaching and learning of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 25–43. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9799-1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Chapell, K., Hetherington, L., Keene, H. R., Wren, H., Alexopoulos, A., Ben-Horin, O., Nikolopoulos, K., Robberstad, J., Sotiriou, S., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). Dialogue and materiality/embodiment in science|arts creative pedagogy: Their role and manifestation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.008 [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Clapp, E. P., & Jimenez, R. L. (2016). Implementing STEAM in maker-centered learning. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(4), 481. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000066 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Litle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar]
• Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Gray, D., & Cooke, C. (2019, May). A critical review of STEAM (Science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.398 [Google Scholar]
• Costantino, T. (2018). STEAM by another name: Transdisciplinary practice in art and design education. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2017.1292973 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Elliott, J. (2009). Building educational theory through action research. In S. E. Noffke, & B. Somekh (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of educational action research (pp. 28–38). SAGE. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R. L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Escobar Pérez, J., & Cuervo Martínez, A. (2008). Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en Medición, 6(1), 27–36. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2981181 [Google Scholar]
• Etim, J. S. (Ed.). (2005). Curriculum integration K-12: Theory and practice. University Press of America. [Google Scholar]
• Friese, S. (2013). ATLAS.ti 7: User guide and reference. ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. [Google Scholar]
• Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. (2015). Emerging technologies for STEAM education: Full STEAM ahead. Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educationial Change, 19(2), 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Henrkisen, D., DeSchryver, M., & Mishra, P. (2015). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century transform and transcend: Synthesis as a trans-disciplinary approach to thinking and learning. TechTrends, 59(4), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0863-9 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Herro, D., & Quigley, C. (2016). STEAM enacted: A case study of a middle school teacher implementing STEAM instructional practices. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 35(4), 319–342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1205507 [Google Scholar]
• Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer. [Google Scholar]
• Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy Culture & Society, 18(1), 9–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681360903556756 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Khine, M. S., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). STEAM education: Theory and practice. Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Klein, J. T., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Häberli, R., Bill, A., Scholz, R. W., & Welti, M. (2001). Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser Verlag. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Loewenthal, K. M., & Lewis, C. A. (2018). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. Psychology press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 55(2), 104–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2014.11518922 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Nicolescu, B. (2012). Transdisciplinarity: The hidden third, between the subject and the object. Human and Social Studies, 1(2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10317-012-0002-5 [Google Scholar]
• Niemi, D., Vallone, J., & Vendlinski, T. (2006). The power of big ideas in mathematics education: Development and pilot testing of POWERSOURCE assessments (CSE Report 697). National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). [Google Scholar]
• Park, J., & Son, J. (2010). Transitioning toward transdisciplinary learning in a multidisciplianary environment. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 6(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.6.1.82 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.10.002 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
• Rice, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Torres Santomé, J. (1994). Globalización e interdisciplinariedad: el currículum integrado. Ediciones Morata. [Google Scholar]
• Wenger, E. (2002). Comunidades de práctica. Ediciones Paidós Ibérica. [Google Scholar]