Creatividad, pensamiento crítico y trabajo en equipo en Educación Primariaun enfoque interdisciplinar a través de proyectos STEAM

  1. Raquel Casado Fernández
  2. Mirian Checa Romero
Journal:
Revista complutense de educación

ISSN: 1130-2496,  1988-2793

Year of publication: 2023

Volume: 34

Issue: 3

Pages: 629-640

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5209/RCED.79861 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista complutense de educación

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

STEAM education entails an approach for coworking with Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics that, apart from boosting the development of scientific thinking, impulses the development of some of the key skills of the century XXI. This study explores the impact on creativity, critical thinking and teamwork on 5th and 6th grade students when applying STEAM projects in the classroom. This research presents an ethnographic exploratory case study where participants discourse is analysed in a Primary Educational School of Comunidad de Madrid, has as main objective analyzing how children communicate when the student body works in teams with experienced adults who guide them, taking advantage from the potentiality of this powerful resource. The results show that in each phase of the workshop, the inclusion into the classroom of STEAM projects generates educational scenarios that strengthen the mentioned competencies. The development of the study reveals the need of saving spaces so that the educational agents keep on investigating with this kind of projects in different contexts for the development of transverse cognitive competencies which go further than rote learning.

Bibliographic References

  • Aguilera D, Ortiz-Revilla J. (2021). STEM vs. STEAM Education and Student Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 11(7), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070331
  • Almerich, G., Díaz-García, I. Cebrián-Cifuentes, S. y Suárez-Rodríguez, J. (2018). Estructura dimensional de las competencias del siglo XXI en los estudiantes universitarios de educación. Relieve, 24(1), 229-243. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.24.1.12548
  • Amineh, R.J. y Asl, H.D. (2015). Review of Constructivism and Social Constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.
  • Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2006). Les divers courants en anthropologie de l’éducation. Dans Éducation et sociétés, 1(17), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.3917/es.017.07
  • Andreu-Andrés, M.Á. y García-Casas, M. (2014). Evaluación del pensamiento crítico en el trabajo en grupo. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 32 (1), 203-222.http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.32.1.157631
  • Barker, B. y Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as Means to Increase Achievement Scores in an Informal Learning Environment. Journal of research on technology in education, 39(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782481
  • Bassachs, M., Cañabate, D., Nogué, L., Serra, T., Bubnys, R., y Colomer, J. (2020). Fomentar la reflexión crítica en la educación primaria a través de enfoques STEAM. Ciencias de la Educación, 10(12), 384. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120384
  • Bassachs, M., Cañabate, D., Nogué, L., Serra, T., Bubnys, R. y Colomer, J. (2020). Fostering Critical Reflection in Primary Education through STEAM Approaches. Education Sciences, 10(12), 384. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120384
  • Binkley, M. et al. (2012) Defining Twenty-First Century Skills. In: P. Griffin, B. McGaw y E. Care (eds) Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
  • Caratozzolo, P. y Delgado, A. (2020). Desarrollo de pensamiento creativo en ingeniería usando el enfoque STEAM. Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa 2020, CIIE2020.
  • Casado, R. y Checa-Romero, M. (2020). Robótica y Proyectos STEA: Desarrollo de la creatividad en las aulas de Educación Primaria. Píxel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 58, 51-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.73672
  • Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of 21st Century Skills and Competencies in Primary Education. International Journal of Instruction, 11 (3), 1-16, https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a
  • Ching-Chiang, L., y Fernández-Cárdenas, J. (2020). Analysing Dialogue in STEM Classrooms in Ecuador: A Dual Socioeconomic Context in a High School. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 194-215. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.529
  • Clapp, E., y Jimenez, R. (2016). Implementing STEAM in Maker-Centered Learning. Psychology of Aesthetics. Creativity and the Arts, 10(4), 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000066
  • Diego-Mantecón, J., Blanco, T., Ortiz-Laso, Z. y Lavicza, Z. (2021). STEAM projects with KIKS format for developing key competences, Revista Comunicar, 66, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-03
  • García-Cano, M., Márquez, E. y Antolínez, I. (2016). Una comunidad de aprendizaje desde el enforque intercultural: Diálogos, emergencias y contradicciones en la práctica escolar. Educación XX1, 19(2), 251-271. http://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.16466
  • Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Kellam, N., Kellam, N. N. y Walther, J. (2015). Collaborative creativity in STEAM: Narratives of art education students’ experiences in transdisciplinary spaces. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(15). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v16n15/
  • Hafeez, M. (2021). Systematic Review on Modern Learning Approaches, Critical Thinking Skills and Students Learning Outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 4(1), 167-78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v4i1
  • Henriksen, D. (2014) Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices. The STEAM Journal, 1 (2), 15. DOI: 10.5642/steam.20140102.15
  • Higuera, O.I., Fernández-Samacá, L. y Serrano, L.F. (2021) Trends and opportunities by fostering creativity in science and engineering: a systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2021.1974350
  • Jonassen, D. (2008). Instructional design as design problem solving: An iterative process. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education, 48(3), 21-26. Recuperado de https://bit.ly/2XTjWbC
  • Kennedy, T. J., y Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students in STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1044508.pdf
  • Khanolainen, D., Semenova, E. y Magnuson, P. (2021). ‘Teachers see nothing’: exploring students’ and teachers’ perspectives on school bullying with a new arts-based methodology. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 29(3), 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1751249
  • Lin, Q., Yin, Y., Tang, X., Hadad, R. y Zhai, X. (2020). Assessing learning in technology-rich maker activities: A systematic review of empirical research, Computers & Education, 157, 103944, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103944.
  • López, V., Couso, D. y Simarro, C. (2020). Educación STEM en y para un mundo digital: el papel de las herramientas digitales en el desempeño de prácticas científicas, ingenieriles y matemáticas. RED Revista de Educación a Distancia, 62 (20), 1-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/red.410011
  • López-Fernández, V. y Llamas-Salguero, F. (2018). Neuropsicología del proceso creativo. Un enfoque educativo. Revista Complutense de Educación, 29 (1), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.52103
  • Navarro, I., González, C., López, B. y Botella, P. (2015). Aprendizaje de contenidos académicos y desarrollo de competencias profesionales mediante prácticas didácticas centradas en el trabajo cooperativo y relaciones multidisciplinares. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 33(1), 99-117.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.33.1.183971
  • Nielsen, D. y Thurber, S. (2018). Conexiones creativas. La herramienta secreta de las mentes innovadoras. Editorial Gustavo Gill.
  • Nielsen, D. y Thurber, S. (2018). Conexiones creativas. La herramienta secreta de las mentes innovadoras. Editorial Gustavo Gill.
  • Peñaherrera, M., Ortiz, A. y Cobos, F. (2013). ¿Cómo promover la educación científica en el alumnado de primaria? Una experiencia desde el contexto ecuatoriano. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 10(2), 222-232. http://hdl.handle.net/10498/15117
  • Piaget, J. (1978). La equilibración de las estructuras cognitivas. Problema central de desarrollo. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
  • Rahman, N.A.; Rosili, R., Rambely, A.S. y Halim, L. (2021). Mathematics Teachers’ Practices of STEM Education: A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Educational Research, 10 (3), 1541-1559. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1541
  • Rahmawati, R., Lestari, F. y Umam, R. (2019). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Learning in the Use of Learning Modules Against Student Learning Outcomes. Desimal: Journal Matematika, 2(3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v2i3.4557
  • Reinking, A. y Martin, B. (2018). The gender gap in STEM fields: Theories, movements, and ideas to engage girls in STEM. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 7(2), 148-153. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2018.7.271
  • Root-Bernstein, R.S. (2003). The art of innovation: Polymaths and the universality of the creative process. In L. Shavanina (Ed.), International handbook of innovation, 267-278. Elsevier.
  • Sang-Hong, K., Nam-Hun, P. y Kil-Hong, J. (2014). Effects of Flipped Classroom based on Smart Learning on Self-directed and Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Control and Automation, 7(12), 69-80 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijca.2014.7.12.07
  • Scardamalia, M., y Bereiter, C. (2003). Beyond Brainstorming: Sustained creative work with ideas. Education Canada, 43(4), 4-8.
  • Shaffer, D.W. (2006). Epistemic frames for epistemic games. Computers & Education, 46(3), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.003
  • Shneiderman, B. (2003). Leonardo’ s laptop: Human needs and the new computing technologies. The MIT Press.
  • Torrelles, C., Coiduras, J., Isus, S., Carrera, F. X., París, G., y Cela, J. M. (2011). Competencia de trabajo en equipo: definición y categorización. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 15(3), 329-344. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=56722230020
  • Tunc, C., y Bagceci, B. (2021). Teachers’ Views of the Implementation of STEM Approach in Secondary Schools and The Effects on Students. Pedagogical Research, 6(1), em0085. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9295
  • Weitzman, E. A. (2004). Advancing the scientific basis of qualitative research. In C. C. Ragin, J. Nagel, & P. White (Eds.), Workshop on scientific foundations of qualitative research, 04(219), 145–148. National Science Foundation.
  • White, D. y Delaney, S. (2021). Full STEAM ahead, but who has the map for integration? – A PRISMA systematic review on the incorporation of interdisciplinary learning into schools. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9 (2), 9-32. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.2.1387
Data source: Dialnet