Inteligencia contextual percibida en el deporte. Desarrollo y validación de un cuestionario

  1. Luis Miguel Ruiz Pérez 1
  2. José Luis Graupera Sanz 2
  3. Virginia García Coll 3
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. España
  2. 2 Universidad de Alcalá. España
  3. 3 Universidad de Castilla La Mancha. España
Revista:
Cultura, ciencia y deporte

ISSN: 1696-5043

Ano de publicación: 2014

Volume: 9

Número: 27

Páxinas: 211-224

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.12800/CCD.V9I27.463 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Cultura, ciencia y deporte

Resumo

The purpose of this study was to create, develop, and validate a questionnaire about perceived contextual intelligence in sport in a sample of Spanish athletes of different levels of expertise. 2091 athletes (1519 men and 572 women) participated in this study with ages ranging from 11 to 59 years (M = 20.8, SD = 6.14). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the questionnaire presented a three-dimensional (anticipatory intelligence, tactical intelligence, and competitive intelligence) structure, and it allows us to obtain a value from the overall scale called Perceived Contextual Intelligence in Sport. The psychometric properties of validity and reliability for this instrument were excellent to be used in studies in which this dimension was of interest.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Beyer, S. (1990). Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 960-970. doi: 10. 1037/0022-3514. 59. 5. 960.
  • Brown, C. H., Gould, D., & Foster, S. (2005). A framework for developing contextual intelligence. The Sport Psychologist, 19, 51-62.
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS. Mahwah, New Jersey: LEA Publishers.
  • Cianciolo, A. T., Matthew, C., Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence and expertise. En K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 613-632). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Coenders, G., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Saris, W. E. (2005). Temas avanzados en modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. Madrid: La Muralla.
  • Cratty, B. J. (1972). Physical expressions of intelligence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Drasgow, F. (2003). Intelligence and the workplace. En W. Borman, D. Ilgen, & R. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 107-129). New York: John Wiley.
  • Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Visscher, C., Richard, H., & Lemmink, K. A. P. M. (2005). Development of the tactical skills inventory for sports. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99, 883-895.
  • Furnham, A. (2005). Gender and personality differences in self and other ratings of business intelligence. British Journal of Management, 16, 91-103.
  • García, V., Graupera, J. L., Ruiz, L. M., & Palomo, M. (2013). Inteligencia emocional en el deporte. Validación del Schutte Self-Report Inventory (SSRI) en deportistas españoles. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 13(1), 25-36.
  • García, V., Ruiz, L. M., & Graupera, J. L. (2009). Perfiles decisionales de jugadores y jugadoras de voleibol de diferente nivel de pericia. Revis-ta Internacional de Ciencias del Deporte (RICYDE), 5(14), 123-137. doi: 10. 5232/ricyde2009. 01410.
  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New Cork: Basic Books.
  • Gardner, H. (1987). Es-tructuras de la mente. La teoría de las múltiples inteligencias. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiples intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
  • Goleman, D. (1996). Inteligencia emocional. Barcelona: Kairós.
  • Goleman, D. (2006). Inteligencia social. La nueva ciencia de las relaciones humanas. Barcelona: Kairós.
  • Gould, D., Fuinan, D., Greenleaf, C., Medbery, R., & Peterson, P. (1999). Factors affecting Olympic performance: Perceptions of athletes and coaches from more and less successful teams. The Sport Psychologist, 13, 371-394.
  • Graupera, J. L. (2007). Estilos de aprendizaje en la actividad física y el de-porte (Tesis doctoral no publicada). Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo.
  • Graupera, J. L., Ruiz, L. M., García, V., & Smith, R. (2011). Development and validation of a Spanish version of an athletic coping skills inventory, ASCI-28. Psicothema, 23(3), 495-502.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Haynes, S. N., Richard, D. C. S., & Kubany, E. S. (1995). Content validity in psychological assessment. A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychological Assessment, 7, 238-247.
  • Jones, G. (2012). The role of superior performance intelligence in sustained success. En S. M. Murphy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of sport and performance psychology (pp. 62-80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kline, R. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Kling, K. C., Hyde, J. S., Showers, C. J., & Buswell, B. N. (1999). Gender differences in self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(4), 470-500. doi: 10. 1037/0033-2909. 125. 4. 470.
  • Marina, J. A. (2012). Inteligencia ejecutiva. Madrid: Ariel.
  • Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport and exercise psychology. En G. Tenenbaum, & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of on sport psychology (pp. 774-798). New York: Wiley.
  • McPherson, S. (1994). The development of sport expertise: Mapping the tactical domain. Quest, 46, 223-240.
  • Murphy, S. M. (2012). The Oxford handbook of sport and performance psy-chology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Nelson, M. B. (2009). The damage I have done to myself: Physical intelligence among college athletes. Journal of Intercollegiate Sports, 2, 127-144.
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003) Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • Peña, D. (1999). Estadística. Modelos y métodos (2ª ed.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Pérez, C. (2004). Técnicas de análisis multivariante de datos. Madrid: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
  • Rowland, M. (2009). Extended cognition and the mark of the cognitve. Philosophical Psychology, 22(1), 1-19.
  • Ruiz, L. M., & Arruza, J. A. (2005). El proceso de toma de decisiones en el deporte. Clave de la eficiencia y el rendimiento óptimo. Madrid: Paidós.
  • Ruiz, L. M., Graupera, J. L., & Sánchez, F. (2000). Dimensión subjetiva de la toma de decisiones en el deporte. Desarrollo y validación del Cuestiona-rio CETD de un cuestionario de estilo de decisión en el deporte. CARID: Consejo Superior de Deportes.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Intelligence and wisdom. En R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 631-649). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sternberg, R. J., Forsythe, G. B., Hedlund, J., Horvath, J. A., Wagner, R. K., Williams, W. M., Snook, S. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000) Practical intelligence in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3ª ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
  • Tennenbaum, G., & Bar-Eli, M. (2007). Personality and intellectual capabilities in sport psychology. En D. Smith, & M. Bar Eli (Eds.), Essential readings in sport and exercise psychology (pp. 102-120). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
  • Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of Institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 1-10.