Explorando el uso de métricas espaciales para identificar "entornos de movilidad" urbanos

  1. Soria-Lara, Julio A.
  2. Arranz López, Aldo
  3. Aguilera Benavente, Francisco
Zeitschrift:
Anales de geografía de la Universidad Complutense

ISSN: 0211-9803

Datum der Publikation: 2014

Ausgabe: 34

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 185-208

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5209/REV_AGUC.2014.V34.N2.47077 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Anales de geografía de la Universidad Complutense

Zusammenfassung

Achieving sustainable development outcomes in urban transport planning has contributed to developed new concepts orientated towards linking land use and transport system. In this context, the novel concept of �mobility environments� appears having successful applications in daily practice. This paper aims to gain insight into exploring useful tools in defining the spatial dimension of �mobility environments�. To address this, a research methodology based on using spatial metrics through moving window has been developed. This methodology measures different spatial characteristics of a set of �mobility environments� previously defined in Metropolitan Area of Granada (Spain). Then, an analysis based on a Mann-Whitney U test. Obtained results reveal the initial exploration of unstudied research field with potential to link land use and transport system

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • AGUILERA, F. (2008). "Análisis ecopaisajístico para la ordenación territorial del área metropolitana de Granada". Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Granada, Spain.
  • AGUILERA, F., VALENZUELA, L. M., y BOTEQUILHA-LEITÃO, A. (2011). Landscape metrics in the analysis of urban land use patterns: A case study in a Spanish metropolitan area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99(3), 226-238.
  • ALBERTI, M., y MARZLUFF, J., (2004). Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: Linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosystem. 7, 241-265.
  • ALBERTI, M., y WADDELL, P., (2000). An integrated urban development and ecological simulation model. International Assessment. 1, 215-227.
  • BANISTER, D., (2005). Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century. London, Routledge.
  • BANISTER, D., (2008). "The sustainable mobility paradigm". Transport policy,15, 73-80.
  • BANISTER, D., ANDERTON, K., BONILLA, D., GIVONI, M., y SCHWANEN T (2011). Transportation and the Environment. Annual Review Environmental Resources, 36: 247-270.
  • BERLING-WOLF, S., y WU, J., (2004). Modelling urban landscape dynamics: A case study in Phoenix, USA. Urban Ecosystem. 7, 215-240
  • BERTOLINI, L. (2006). Fostering urbanity in a mobile society: Linking concepts and practices. Journal of urban design, 11(3), 319-334.
  • BERTOLINI, L (2012). Integrating Mobility and Urban Development Agendas: A Manifesto. DISP, 48(1), 16-26.
  • BERTOLINI, L. y DJIST, M (2003). Mobility environments and network cities. Journal of Urban Design, 8 (1), 27-43.
  • CERVERO, R. y KOCKELMAN, K (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity and design. Transportation Research, 2, 199-219.
  • DIBARI, J., (2007). Evaluation of five landscape-level metrics for measuring the effects of urbanization on landscape structure: The case of Tucson, Arizona, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning. 79, 308-313.
  • DIAZ-VARELA, E., ÁLVAREZ-LÓPEZ, C. y MAREY-PÉREZ, M.P. (2009). Multiscale delineation of landscape planning units based on spatial variation of land-use patterns in Galicia, NW Spain. Landscape Ecological Engineering, 5, 1-10
  • EWIN, R. y CERVERO R., (2001). Travel and built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 35-15
  • EWING, R. y R. CERVERO, (2012). Travel and built environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 265-294.
  • GAUCHEREL, C. (2007). Multiscale heterogeneity map and associated scaling profile for landscape analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(3), 95-102.
  • GEOGHEGAN, J., WAINGER, L.A. and BOCKSTAEL, N.E., (1997). Spatial landscape índices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics. 23, 251-264.
  • HASS-KLAU, C. y CRAMPTON, G., (2005). Future of Urban Transport. Learning from success and weakness: Light Rail. Environmental and transport planning. Bergische Universität Wuppertal.
  • HEROLD, M., LIU, X., y CLARKE, K. C. (2003). Spatial metrics and image texture for mapping urban land use. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69(9), 991-1002.
  • JAIN, S., KOHLI, D., RAO, R.M., y BIJKER, W. (2011). Spatial Metrics to Analyse the Impact of Regional Factors on Pattern of Urbanisation in Gurgaon, India. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 39(2), 203-212.
  • JI, W., MA, J., TWIBELL, R.W y UNDERHILL,K (2006). Characterizing urban sprawl using multi-stage remote sensing images and landscape metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30, 861-879.
  • KONG, F., y NAKAGOSHI, N. (2006). Spatial-Temporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 147-164.
  • LITMAN, T., (2009). Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Victoria (Canada)
  • LUCK, M., y WU, J., (2002). A gradient analysis of the landscape pattern of urbanization in the Phoenix metropolitan area of USA. Landscape Ecology. 17, 327-339.
  • MIRALLES-GUASCH, C., y DOMENE, E (2010). Sustainable transport through modal change: The case of the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Transport Policy, 17, 454-463.
  • NAESS, P., (2009). Residential self selection and appropriate control variables in land use: Travel studies. Transport Reviews, 29 (3), 293-324.
  • PHAM, H. M. y YAMAGUCHI, Y. (2011). Urban growth and change analysis using remote sensing and spatial metrics from 1975 to 2003 for Hanoi, Vietnam. International Journal of Remote Sensing 32(7), 1901-1915.
  • PITOMBO, C.S., KAWAMOTO, E. y A.J SOUSA. (2010). An exploration analysis of relationships between socioeconomic, land use, activity participation variables and travel patterns. Transport Policy, 18, 347-357.
  • SHRESTHA, M. K., YORK, A. M., BOONE, C.H. y ZHANG, S. (2012). Land fragmentation due to rapid urbanization in the Phoenix Metropolitan Area: Analyzing the spatiotemporal patterns and drivers. Applied Geography, 32, 522-531.
  • SILVA, C. y PINHO, P. (2010). The Structural Accessibility Layer (SAL): Revealing how urban structures constrains travel choice. Environment and Planning A, 42, 2735-2752.
  • SORIA-LARA, JULIO ALBERTO., (2011). "Modelo de umbrales para la evaluación ambiental de la movilidad urbana". Tesis Doctoral. University of Granada.
  • SORIA-LARA JA y VALENZUELA-MONTES LM. (2014). "Beyond urban structure and travel patterns. Mobility environments as a planning concept". Boletín Asociación Geógrafos Españoles. 64, 273-296.
  • SUN, C., WU, Z. F, LV, Z., YAO, N., y WEI, J. (2013). Quantifying different types of urban growth and the change dynamic in Guangzhou using multi-Temporal remote sensing data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 21, 409-417.
  • TALAVERA-GARCÍA R, SORIA-LARA JA y VALENZUELA-MONTES, LM. (2014). "La calidad peatonal como método para evaluar entornos de movilidad urbanos". Documents d'Anàlisi Geogràfica 60/1, 161-187
  • TV, R., AITHAL B H. y SANNA, D.D. (2012). Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 18, 329-343.
  • VALENZUELA-MONTES, L.M., SORIA-LARA, J.A. y TALAVERA-GARCÍA, R. (2011). Hacia la integración de los planes and proyectos andaluces de movilidad metropolitana. Scripta Nova. Geocrítica, 15 (349), 1-15.
  • VUCHIC, V.R., (2005). Urban Transit. Operations, Planning and Economics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • WEGENER, M., y FÜRST, F. (2004). Land-use transport interaction: State of the art. Available at SSRN 1434678.
  • XIE, Y.,YU, M., BAI, Y., y XING, X. (2006). Ecological analysis of an emerging urban landscape pattern-desakota: A case study in Suzhou, China. Landscape Ecology 21, 1297-1309.
  • XU, C., LIU, M., ZHANG, C., AN, S., YU, W. y CHEN J.M (2007). The spatiotemporal dynamics of rapid urban growth in the Nanjing metropolitan region of China. Landscape Ecology, 22, 925-937.
  • YANG, Q., LI, J., GAN, X., ZHANG, J., YANG, F. y QIAN, Y. (2012). Comparison of landscape patterns between metropolises and small-sized cities: A gradient analysis with changing grain size in Shanghai and Zhangjiagang, China. International Journal of Remote. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33(5), 1446-1464.
  • YEH, C. T., y HUANG, S. L. (2009). Investigating spatiotemporal patterns of landscape diversity in response to urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 93(3), 151-162.
  • ZANDVLIET, R., BERTOLINI, L y DIJST, M. (2008). Towards planning for a mobile society: Mobile and residential populations and the performance of places. European Planning Studies, 16(10), 1459-1472.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet