La geografía del talento en la ciudad de Madrid

  1. Rubén Garrido Yserte 1
  2. María Teresa Gallo Rivera 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Revista:
Papeles de economía española

ISSN: 0210-9107

Año de publicación: 2017

Título del ejemplar: Economía de las ciudades

Número: 153

Páginas: 127-148

Tipo: Artículo

Otras publicaciones en: Papeles de economía española

Resumen

Some urban centers have become, over the years, worldwide references in the attraction and retention of talent. This is the case of the city of Madrid, as the latest Competitiveness Index for Global Talent (GTCI) highlights. This paper analyzes the geographical distribution and spatial dynamics of creative class workers in the city of Madrid. The results of Index of Creativity by Districts (ICD) and neighborhoods (ICB) are showed with the aim of analyze the factors that foster the competitiveness of talent in the city of Madrid.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ALFKEN, C.; BROEKEL, T. y R. STERNBERG (2013), «Factors explaining the spatial agglomeration of the Creative Class – Empirical evidence for German artists», Working Paper on Innovation and Space, 02.2013, Philipps-Universität Marburg.
  • BADER, I., y A. SCHARENBERG (2010), «The sound of Berlin: Subculture and the global music industry», International Journal of Urban and regional research, 34(1): 76–91.
  • BEREITSCHAFT, B. y R. CAMMACK (2015), «Neighborhood diversity and the creative class in Chicago», Applied geography, 63: 166e183
  • BETZ, M.; PARTRIDGE, M.D. y B. FALLAH (2016), «Smart cities and attracting knowledge workers: Which cities attract highly-educated workers in the 21st century?», Papers in Regional Science, 95(4): 819-841.
  • BOIX, R. y L. LAZZERETTI (2012), «Las industrias creativas en España: una panorámica», Investigaciones Regionales (Journal of Regional research), 22: 181 a 206.
  • BUETTNER, T. y E. JANEBA (2016), «City competition for the creative class», Journal of Cultural Economics, 40: 413–451.
  • BROWN (2015), «Home from home? Locational Choices of International ‘Creative Class’ Workers», European Planning Studies, 23(12): 2336-2355.
  • COMUNIAN, R.; GILMORE, A. y S. JACOBI (2015), «Higher Education and the Creative Economy: Creative Graduates, Knowledge Transfer and Regional Impact Debates», geography compass 9/7 (2015): 371–383.
  • CORREIA, C. M. y J. DA SILVA COSTA (2014), «Measuring Creativity in the EU Member States», Investigaciones Regionales (Journal of Regional research), 30: 7-26.
  • CRUZ, S. y A. A. C. TEIXEIRA (2014), «Assessing the Magnitude of Creative Employment: A Comprehensive Mapping and Estimation of Existing Methodologies», European Planning Studies, 22 (10): 2172–2209.
  • DELISLE, F. y R. SHEARMUR (2010), «Where does all the talen flow? Migration of young graduates and nongraduates, Canada 1996 – 2001», The Canadian Geographer, 54, No. 3, 305 -323.
  • EWERS, M. C. (2017), «International knowledge mobility and urban development in rapidly globalizing areas: building global hubs for talent in Dubai and Abu Dhabi». Urban geography, 38 (2): 291-314.
  • FLORIDA, R. (2002), «The economic geography of talent», Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92, 4, pp. 743 – 755.
  • FLORIDA, R. (2005), Cities and the creative class, Routledge, New York.
  • GUIMARÃES, P.; MUNN, J. y D. WOODWARD (2015), «Creative clustering: The location of independent inventors», Papers in Regional Science, 94 (1): 45-65.
  • HAISCH, T. y C. KLÖPPER (2015), «Location choices of the creative class: Does tolerance make a difference? Journal of Urban Affairs, 37 (3): 233–254.
  • HEYUAN, Y. y B. CHENMENG (2017), «Creative class agglomeration across time and space in knowledge city: Determinant and their relative importance», Habitat International, 60: 91e100.
  • INSEAD (2016), The Global Talent Competitiveness Index. Talent and Technology 2017. Fontainebleau, France
  • LAWTON, P., MURPHY, E. y D. REDMOND (2013), «Residential preferences of the ‘creative class’?», Cities, 31: 47-56.
  • PAREJA-EASTAWAY, M. y M. PRADEL i MIQUEL (2015), «Towards the Creative and Knowledge Economies: Analysing Diverse Pathways in Spanish Cities», european Planning Studies, 23 (12): 2404-2422.
  • REINER, C., MEYER, S. y S. SARDADVAR (2017), «Urban attraction policies for international academic talent: Munich and Vienna in comparison», Cities, 61: 27-35.
  • SÁNCHEZ SERRA, D. (2016), «Location determinants of creative industries’ firms in Spain», Investigaciones Regionales (Journal of Regional research), 34: 23-48.
  • THIEL, J. (2017), «Creative cities and the reflexivity of the urban creative economy», European Urban and Regional Studies, 24 (1): 21-34.
  • UNCTAD (2008), Creative economy. Report 2008. UNDP-UNCTAD, Geneva-New York.
  • UNCTAD (2010), Creative economy. Report 2010. UNDP-UNCTAD, Geneva- New York.
  • UNCTAD (2013), Informe sobre la Economía Creativa 2013. Edición Especial. Ampliar los Cauces del Desarrollo Local. UNDP-UNCTAD, Geneva-New York.
  • VAN HOLMN, E. J. (2014), «Leisure choices of the creative class». Cities, 41: 38-43.
  • VAN WIDEN, W. y L. CARVALHO (2016), «Urbanize or Perish? Assessing the Urbanization of Knowledge Locations in Europe», Journal of Urban Technology, 23:1, 53-70.
  • WEDEMEIER, J. (2015), «Creative Professionals, Local Amenities and Externalities: Do Regional Concentrations of Creative Professionals Reinforce Themselves Over Time?», European Planning Studies, 23 (12): 2464-24682