Las Oficinas de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación (OTRIs) y su competencia sobre las Empresas de Base Tecnológica (EBTs) en España

  1. Nieto González, Jesús 1
  2. Crecente Romero, Fernando J. 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Revue:
International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

ISSN: 2387-0184

Année de publication: 2018

Volumen: 5

Número: 2

Pages: 63-71

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

D'autres publications dans: International Journal of Information Systems and Software Engineering for Big Companies: IJISEBC

Résumé

This work defines the competences of the Offices of Transfer of Research Results (Oficinas de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación) from the Spanish universities towards the creation and support of Technological Bases Companies (Empresas de Base tecnológica- EBT). The analysis method is developed through suverys launched on the one hand to the OTRIs and another to the EBTs. On the one hand, the different advisory and training functions carried out by the OTRIs in the relationship with the EBTs are analyzed, especially the environmental aspects, the problems, the rules, legal terms, use of resources ant tools. The analysis emerges from the existence of a direct relationship between the survival of the companies advised and the type of contractual relationship with the OTRI. On the other hand, we have a feedback about the OTRIs from the EBTs

Références bibliographiques

  • Aldridge, T.; Audretsch, D. (2012). Transnational social capital and scientist entrepreneurship. Journal of management & governance, 16(3), 369-376.
  • Bercovitz, J.; Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level. Organization science, 19(1).
  • Bueno, E. (2011). Curso básico de economía de empresa. Un enfoque de organización. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Castillo-Vergara, M.; Alvárez Marín, A. (2015). La transferencia de investigación en instituciones de educación superior mediante spin-off. Actualidades investigativas en Educación, 15(3), 1-23.
  • Cardozo, R.; Meyskens, M.; Carsrud, A. (2010). The symbiosis of entities in the social engagement network: the role of social ventures. Entrepreneurship & regional development: an international journal, 22.
  • Clarysse, B.; Tartari, V.; Salter, A. (2011). The impact of entrepreneurial capacity, experience and organizational support on academic entrepreneurship. Research policy, 40(8), 1084-1093.
  • García-Rodríguez, C. (2016). Las empresas spin-off académicas: herramientas de transferencia científica desde las universidades. Perspectiva Socioeconómica, 4, 126-158.
  • Grimm, H.; Jaenicke, J. (2012). What drives patenting and commerzialisation activity at East German universities? The role of new public policy, institutional environment and individual prior knowledge. The journal of technology transfer, 37(4), 454-577.
  • Grimpe, C. (2009). Search patterns and absorptive capacity: low- and high- technology sectors in European countries. Research policy, 38(3), 495-506.
  • Heisey, P.; Adelman, S. (2011). Research expenditures, technology transfer activity, and university licensing revenue. The journal of technology transfer, 36(1), 38-60.
  • Hulett, M.; Pérez, L. (2002). Rethinking the entrepreneurial process: pre-hatching management. Espacios, 23(3).
  • Infante, R.; Marinakis, A.; Velasco, J. (2003). Minimum wage in Chile: An example of the potential and limitations of this policy instrument. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • Krueger, N. (2008). Entrepreneurial resilience: real & perceived barriers to implementing entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Northwest. University of Phoenix - Global Business Research, School of Advanced Studies. Max Planck Institute for Economics.
  • Matiz, F. (2009). Investigación en emprendimiento, un reto para la construcción del conocimiento. Escuela de administración de negocios, (66).
  • Nueno, P. (1994). La dinámica del sector del automóvil. Mk. Marketing y ventas para directivos.
  • Power, D. (2005). Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. Supply chain management: an international journal, 10(4).
  • Powers, J.; McDougall, P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 20(3), 291-311.
  • Rasmussen, E.; Borch, O. (2010). University capatilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study of spin- off ventures at mid- range universities. Research policy, 39(5), 602-612.
  • Ries, E. (2011). El método lean startup. Crown publishing group.
  • Villalobos, B.; Ovallos, D.; Maldonado, D.; de la Hoz, S. (2016). Factores que inciden en el desempeño eficiente de una Oficina de Transferencia de Resultados de Investigación (OTRI): Caso Cientech. Espacios, 37(9), 10.
  • Wilson, F.; Kickul, J.; Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions: implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 31(3), 387-406.
La source de données: Dialnet