El láser de Femtosegundo en cirugía refractiva

  1. Carmen María Bouza Miguens 1
  2. César Villa Collar 1
  3. Miguel Ángel Teus Guezala 2
  1. 1 Universidad Europea Madrid
  2. 2 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Revista:
Gaceta de optometría y óptica oftálmica

ISSN: 2173-9366

Año de publicación: 2017

Número: 528

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Gaceta de optometría y óptica oftálmica

Resumen

El láser de femtosegundos ha revolucionado la oftalmología. Actualmente este lidera el campo de la cirugía refractiva corneal1. Entre sus varias aplicaciones quirúrgicas disponibles, para la realización de tratamientos refractivos y terapéuticos, es el tratamiento Femto-Lasik o Lasik asistido por láser de femtosegundo, uno de los más aceptados y realizados. Recientes encuestas destacan que actualmente alrededor de un 85% de todos los procedimientos Lasik ya se realizan con láser de femtosegundo2, porcentaje que ha aumentado notoriamente respecto a años anteriores3,4. Prueba de ello es la alta seguridad y precisión quirúrgica que estos ofrecen en la creación del flap corneal. A lo largo del presente artículo se ofrece una revisión del estado del tema y, en particular, del procedimiento Femto-Lasik.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Mayo I, Peña S. Láser de femtosegundo. El futuro de la cirugía refractiva corneal. Revista Thea Innovación. 2010; 59.
  • Guo Y. LASIK Flap Creation: the Cutting Edge of the Femtosecond Laser Refractive Surgery. En: Forum International Society of Refractive Surgery; 2016; Chicago.
  • Binder PS. Femtosecond applications for anterior segment surgery. Eye Contact Lens. 2010; 36:282-5.
  • Slade SG. The use of the femtosecond laser in the customization of corneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007; 18:314-17.
  • Moshirfar M, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis in situ flap complications using mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser: retrospective comparison. Journal Cataract Refractive Surgery 2010 Nov; 36(11):1925-33.
  • Ratkay-Traub I, Ferincz IE, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM, Krueger RR. First clinical results with the femtosecond neodymium-glass laser in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2003; 19:94-103.
  • Faktorovich EG. Femtodynamics: optimizing femtosecond laser settings and procedure techniques to optimize outcomes. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2008;48: 41-50.
  • Arias A. Plataforma Victus®. Bases y Aplicaciones [internet]. Disponible en: http://oftalmoseoformacion.com/wp-oftalmoseo/documentacion/cap_05_plataforma_victus._bases_y_aplicaciones.pdf
  • Hernández Verdejo JL, Teus MA, Román JM, Bolívar G. Porcine model to compare real-time intraocular pressure during LASIK with a mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:68-72.
  • Bouza C, et al. Analysis of the intraocular pressure rise during femtolaser assisted flap creation. A comparison of three different FS platforms. En: Congreso ESCRS; 2016; Copenhague.
  • Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the Intralase® femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:804-11.
  • Alió JL, Piñero DP. Very high-frequency digital ultrasound measurement of the Lasik flap thickness profile using the Intralase femtosecond laser and M2 and Carriazo-Pendular microkeratomes. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:12-23.
  • Zhou Y, Tian L, Wang N, Dougherty PJ. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography measurement of Lasik flaps: femtosecond laser vs. microqueratome. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27:408-16.
  • Zhai CB, Tian L, Zhou YH, Zhang QW, Zhang J. Comparison of the flaps made by femtosecond laser and automated keratomes for sub-bowman keratomileusis. Chin Med J. 2013; 126:2440-4.
  • Zhang J, Zhou Y, Zhai C, Tian L. Comparison of 2 femtosecond lasers for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:922-7.
  • Liu Q, et al. Comparison of corneal flaps created by Wavelight FS200 and Intralase FS60 femtosecond lasers. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016; 9:1006-10.
  • Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:120-6.
  • Gil Cazorla R, Teus MA, de Benito Llopis L, Mikropoulos DG. Femtosecond laser vs mechanical microkeratome for hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 152:16-21.
  • Lim T, Yang S, Kim M, Tchah H. Comparison of the Intralase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:833-9.
  • Tanna M, Schallhorn SC, Hettinger KA.Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of visual outcomes at 3 months. J Refract Surg 2009; 25:668-71.
  • Muñoz G, Albarrán C, Ferrer T, García S, Cerviño A. A long-term comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser flap creation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:1934-44.
  • Chen S, Feng Y, Stojsnovic A, Jankov MR 2nd, Wang Q. Intralase femtosecond laser vs. mechanical microkeratome in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:15-24.
  • Meidani A,Tzavara C. Comparison of efficacy, safety, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis using two laser suites.Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1639-46.
  • Ang M, et al. Visual outcomes comparison of 2 femtosecond laser platforms for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1647-52.
  • Rosman M, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis using 2 femtosecond laser platforms in contralateral eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:1066-73.
  • Sánchez Pina JM, Arránz Márquez E, Gil Ciganda N, Román Guindo JM, Teus MA. Lasik results of Intralase femtosecond laser to correct myopia: efficacy, security and predictability. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2007; 82:423-8.
  • Srinivasan S, Rootman DS. Anterior chamber gas bubble formation during femtosecond laser flap creation for Lasik. J Refract Surg.2007; 23:828-30.
  • Yao P, Xu Y, Zhou X. Comparison of the predictability, uniformity and stability of a laser in situ keratomileusis corneal flap created with a Visumax femtosecond laser or a Moria microkeratome. Int Med Res. 2011; 39:748-58.
  • Stonecipher KG, Dishler JG, Ignacio TS, Binder PS. Transient light sensitivity after femtosecond laser flap creation: clinical findings and management. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32: 91-4.
  • Patel SV, et al. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microqueratome for Lasik: a randomized controlled study. Ophthalmology 2007 Aug; 114(8):1482-90.
  • Petroll WM, et al. Assessment of keratocyte activation following Lasik with flap creation using the Intralase FS60 laser. J Refract Surg. 2008 Oct; 24(8): 847-9.
  • Krueger RR, Thornton IL, Xu M, et al. Rainbow glare as an optical side effect of Intra Lasik. Ophthalmology 2008; 115:1187-95.
  • Gatinel D, Saad A, Guilbert E. Rouger Simultaneous correction of unilateral rainbow glare and residual astigmatism by under surface flap photoablation after femtosecond laser-assisted Lasik. J Refract Surg. 2015; 31:406-10.
  • Blum M, Kunort KS, Sekundo W. Historical overview of the clinical development of the small incision lenticule extraction surgery (SMILE). Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017; 234:117-22.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet