A look back into Ancient Egyptian linguistic studies (c. 1995-2019)

  1. Carlos Gracia Zamacona 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Revista:
Panta Rei: revista de ciencia y didáctica de la historia

ISSN: 1136-2464 2386-8864

Año de publicación: 2020

Volumen: 14

Número: 2

Páginas: 23-42

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.6018/PANTAREI.445451 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Panta Rei: revista de ciencia y didáctica de la historia

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

This article provides a personal overview of the last 25-year linguistic research on ancient Egyptian, the language spoken and written in Egypt since the origin of the written Egyptian civilization (c. 3150 BC) until the disappearance of Coptic as a living language (17th century AC), the longest-attested human language. With this purpose, the main theoretical approaches and their relationship to teaching ancient Egyptian at the university are reviewed. Through the analysis of the more relevant bibliography of the period, four productive research lines are discussed: form and function; documents and the language; lexicon and grammar; and ancient Egyptian metalinguistics. The article ends with a short comment on the need of more corpus-based studies in the future instead of theoreticallybased frameworks for interpreting the ancient Egyptian language.

Información de financiación

This paper has been written under the auspices of the Project The Earlier Ancient Egyptian Mortuary Texts Variability (2018-T1/HUM-10215 Talento Programme, funded by Madrid Region).

Financiadores

  • Madrid Region Spain
    • The Earlier Ancient Egyptian Mortuary Texts Variability

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Allen, J. P. (2013). Middle Egyptian: An introduction to the language and culture of hieroglyphs (3rd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Allen, J. P. (2015). Old Egyptian. In Stauder-Porchet, J., Stauder, A. & Wendrich, W. (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (pp. 1-11). Los Angeles: UCLA. Retrieved from: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002jj949
  • Allen, J. P. (2017). A grammar of the ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts I: Unis. Eisenbrauns: University Park, PA.
  • Allen, J. P., Collier, M. A., & Stauder, A. (eds.) (2016). Coping with obscurity: The Brown workshop on Earlier Egyptian grammar (Wilbour Studies in Egyptology and Assyriology, 3). Atlanta: Lockwood.
  • Arnold, M. (1869). Culture and Anarchy. London: Smith, Elder and Company.
  • Assmann, J. (1974). Ägyptologie und Linguistik. Göttinger Miszellen, 11, 59-76. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Benfey, Th. (1844). Ueber das Verhältniss der ägyptischen Sprache zum semitischen Sprachstamm. Leipzig: Brockhaus. Bertinetto, P. M. (1997). Il dominio tempo-aspettuale: demarcazioni, sezioni, contrasti. Turin: Rosenberg & Sallier.
  • Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27, 3-43.
  • Binnick, R. I. (1991). Time and the verb: A guide to tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Bybee, J. L. (1986). On the nature of grammatical categories: A diachronic perspective. Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, 2, 17-34.
  • Bybee, J., Perkins, R. & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Champollion, J.-F. (1829). Lettres de M. Champollion le jeune, écrites pendant son voyage en Égypte en 1828 et 1829. Paris: Didot.
  • Clère, J. J. (1949). Une nouvelle forme verbale relative en égyptien. In Anonymous (ed.), 21st Congress of Orientalists (pp. 64-66). Paris: Ed. Société Asiatique.
  • Collier, M. (1994). Grounding, cognition and metaphor in the grammar of Middle Egyptian. In F. Junge, F. Kammerzell & A. Loprieno (eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads III), Yale, April 4-9, 1994 (Lingua Aegyptia, 4) (pp. 57-87). Göttingen: Ed. Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • De Cénival, J. L. (1972). Sur la forme sDm.f à redoublement ou mrr.f. Revue d’Égyptologie, 24, 40-45.
  • De Cénival, J. L. (1977). Les écritures du verbe mAA “voir” dans les Textes des Sarcophages: Leurs conséquences théoriques. Revue d’Égyptologie, 29, 21-37.
  • Cromwell, J. and Grossman, E. (eds.) (2017). Scribal repertoires in Egypt from the New Kingdom to the Early Islamic Period. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Depuydt, L. (1983). The Standard theory of the “emphatic” forms in Classical (Middle) Egyptian: a historical survey. Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica, 14, 13-54.
  • Depuydt, L. (1993). A Note on learning and teaching Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia, 3, 1-5.
  • Depuydt, L. (1994). A new generation of teaching grammar (1987-93). Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica, 25, 275-276.
  • Depuydt, L. (1995). Sentence pattern and verb form: Egyptian grammar since Polotsky. Muséon, 108, 39-48.
  • Depuydt, L. (1996). Materials for Egyptian grammar: catalogue of coordinates and satellites of the Middle Egyptian verb. Leuven: Peeters.
  • Derrida, J. (1967). De la grammatologie. Paris: Minuit.
  • Díaz Hernández, R. (2013). Tradition und Innovation in der offiziellen Sprache des Mittleren Reichs: ein strukturalistischer Vergleich der historisch-biographischen mit den literarischen Texten der 1. Zwischenzeit und der 12. Dynastie (Göttinger Orientforschungen, 56). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Edel, E. (1955-1964). Altägyptische Grammatik I-II (Analecta Orientalia, 34 and 39). Rome: Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.
  • Englund, G., & J. Frandsen (eds.) (1986). Crossroad: Chaos or the beginning of a new paradigm; Papers from the conference on Egyptian grammar; Helsingor 28-30 May 1986 (CNI Publications, 1). Copenhague: Carsten Niebuhr Institute of Ancient Near East Studies.
  • Engsheden, Å. (2016). Traditional Egyptian II (Ptolemaic, Roman). In J. Stauder-Porchet, A. Stauder & W. Wendrich (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (pp. 1-9). Los Angeles: Ed. UCLA. Retrieved from: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002k6stb
  • Erman, A., & H. Grapow (1926-1963). Wörterbuch der ägyptischen Sprache I-VII. Leipzig: Hinrichs.
  • Eyre, Ch. (1991). Was ancient Egyptian really a primitive language? In A. Loprieno (ed.), Proceedings of the second international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads II); Los Angeles, October 17-20, 1990 (Lingua Aegyptia, 1) (pp. 97-123). Göttingen: Ed. Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Fecht, G. (1960). Wortakzent und Silbenstruktur: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der ägyptischen Sprache (Ägyptologische Forschungen, 21).
  • Glückstadt: Augustin. Gardiner, A. H. (1951). The theory of speech and language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Gardiner, A. H. (1957). Egyptian grammar: Being an introduction to the study of hieroglyphs (3rd edition; 1st published 1927). Oxford: Griffith Institute.
  • Gillen, T. (ed.) (2017). (Re)productive traditions in ancient Egypt: Proceedings of the conference held at the University of Liège, 6th-8th February 2013 (Ægyptiaca Leodiensia, 10). Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.
  • Golénischeff, W. (1922). Quelques remarques sur la syntaxe égyptienne. In Anonymous (ed.), Recueil d’études égyptologiques: Dédiées à la mémoire de Jean-François Champollion à l’occasion du centenaire de la lettre à M. Dacier relative à l’alphabet des hiéroglyphes phonétiques, lue à l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres le 27 septembre 1822 (pp. 685- 711). Paris: Ed. Édouard Champion. Gracia Zamacona, C. (fc.). (In(ter))discipline: The case of Egyptology. (30 pages).
  • Gracia Zamacona, C. (2015a). Tests on verbal Aktionsart applied to Ancient Egyptian: instruments to determine verbal semantics in an ancient language. Afrikanistik und Aegyptologie Online. Retrieved from https://www.afrikanistik-aegyptologie-online.de/archiv/2015).
  • Gracia Zamacona, C. (2015b). ao ‘enter’, but how, and where? Data from the Coffin Texts. Antiguo Oriente, 13, 41-82. Gracia Zamacona, C. (2013). A database for the Coffin Texts. In S. Polis & J. Winand (eds.), Texts, languages and information technology in Egyptology (Aegyptiaca Leodiensia 9) (pp. 139-155). Liège: Presses Universitaires de Liège.
  • Grossman, E., Haspelmath, M. & Richter, T.S. (eds.) (2015). Egyptian-Coptic linguistics in typological perspective (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 55). Berlin: De Gruyter Moton.
  • Grossman, E., Lescuyer, G. & Polis, St. (2014). Contexts and inferences: The grammaticalization of the Later Egyptian Allative Future. In E. Grossman, S. Polis, A. Stauder & J. Winand (eds.), On forms and functions: Studies in ancient Egyptian grammar (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 15) (pp. 87-136). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Grossman, E., Polis, S. & Winand, J. (eds.) (2012). Lexical semantics in ancient Egyptian (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 9). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Grossman, E., Polis, St., Stauder, A. & Winand, J. (eds.) (2014). On forms and functions: Studies in ancient Egyptian grammar (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 15). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Gunn, B. (1924). Studies in Egyptian syntax. Paris: Geuthner. Hafemann, I. (2001). Zum Zusammenspiel von Semantik und Syntax ägyptischer Verben. Lingua Aegyptia, 10, 151-210. Hafemann, I. (2006). Lexikon und Argumentstruktur. Lingua Aegyptia, 14, 349-374.
  • Hagège, C. (1996). L’homme de paroles: Contribution linguistique aux sciences humaines. Paris: Fayard.
  • Hannig, R. (1999a). Die Sprache der Pharaonen: Großes Handwörterbuch Ägyptisch–Deutsch (2800 bis 950 v. Chr.) (Hannig-Lexica, 1; Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt, 64). Mainz: Zabern.
  • Hannig, R., & Vomberg, P. (1999b). Kulturhandbuch Ägyptens: Wortschatz der Pharaonen in Sachgruppen (Hannig-Lexica, 2; Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt, 72).
  • Mainz: Zabern. Hannig, R. (2000). Die Sprache der Pharaonen: Großes Handwörterbuch Deutsch-Ägyptisch (2800 bis 950 v. Chr.) (Hannig-Lexica, 3; Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt, 86). Mainz: Zabern.
  • Hannig, R. (2003). Ägyptisches Wörterbuch I: Altes Reich und erste Zwischenzeit (Hannig-Lexica, 4; Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt, 98). Mainz: Zabern.
  • Hannig, R. (2006). Ägyptisches Wörterbuch II: Mittleres Reich und Zweite Zwischenzeit (HannigLexica, 5; Kulturgeschichte der antiken Welt, 112). Mainz: Zabern. Hannig, R. (fc.). Ägyptisches Wörterbuch III: Neues Reich (Hannig-Lexica, 6). Mainz: Zabern.
  • Hintze, F. (1950, 1952). Untersuchungen zu Still und Sprache Neuägyptischer Erzählungen (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Orientforschung, 2 and 6). Berlin: Akademie.
  • Jansen-Winkeln, K. (1994). Text und Sprache in der 3. Zwischenzeit: Vorarbeiten zu einer spätmittelägyptischen Grammatik (Ägypten und Altes Testament, 26). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Jansen-Winkeln, K. (1995). Diglossie und Zweisprachigkeit im alten Ägypten. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes, 85, 85-115.
  • Junge, F. (1978). Syntax der mittelägyptische Literatursprache. Mainz: Zabern.
  • Junge, F. (1989). “Emphasis” and sentential meaning in Middle Egyptian (Göttinger Orientforschungen, IV/20). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Junge, F. (1991). How to study Egyptian grammar and to what purpose: A summary of sorts. In Loprieno, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Egyptian Grammar (Crossroads II) Los Angeles, October 17–20, 1990 (Lingua Aegyptia, 1) (pp. 389-426). Göttingen: Ed. Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Junge, F., Kammerzell, F. & Loprieno, A. (eds.) (1994). Proceedings of the third international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads III); Yale, April 4-9, 1994 (Lingua Aegyptia, 4). Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.
  • Klotz, D. (2011). A new edition of the “Book of Nut”. Bibliotheca Orientalis, 65, 476-491.
  • Kruchten, J.M. (1999). From Middle Egyptian to Late Egyptian. Lingua Aegyptia, 6, 1-97.
  • Kurth, D. (2011). Zur Definition des Ptolemäischen. Göttinger Miszellen, 229, 65-80.
  • Lepper, V. (ed.) (2006). After Polotsky: New research and trends in Egyptian and Coptic linguistics (Lingua Aegyptia, 14). Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Von Lieven, A. (2007). Grundriss des Laufes der Sterne: Das Sogenannte Nutbuch (The Carlsberg Papyri, 8; Carsten Niebuhr Institute Publications, 31). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
  • Loprieno, A. (1986). Das Verbalsystem im Ägyptischen und im Semitischen: Zur Grundlegung einer Aspekttheorie (Göttinger Orientforschungen, IV/17). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Loprieno, A. (ed.). (1991). Proceedings of the second international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads II): Los Angeles, October 17-20, 1990. (Lingua Aegyptia 1). Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie. Retrieved from: http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~lingaeg/lingaeg01.htm
  • Loprieno, A. (1994). As a Summary: New tendencies in Egyptological Linguistics. In F. Junge, F. Kammerzell & A. Loprieno (eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads III) Yale, April 4-9, 1994 (Lingua Aegyptia, 4) (pp. 369-382). Göttingen: Ed. Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Loprieno, A. (1995). Ancient Egyptian: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Loprieno, A. (2003). Egyptian linguistics in the year 2000. In Z. Hawass (ed.), Egyptology at the dawn of the twenty-first century: Proceedings of the eighth International Congress of Egyptologists I-III (vol. III, pp. 73-94). Cairo: Ed. American University in Cairo Press.
  • Loprieno, A., Müller, M. & Uljas, S. (2017). Non-Verbal Predication in ancient Egyptian (The Mouton Companions to Ancient Egyptian, 2). Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Der Manuelian, P. (1994). Living in the past: Studies in archaism of the Egyptian twenty-sixth dynasty. London: Kegan Paul International.
  • Maspero, G. (1881). Sur la formation des thèmes trilitères en égyptien. Mémoires de la Société Linguistique de Paris, 4, 185-203.
  • Mathieu, B. (2013). Grammaire et politique: Réflexions sur quelques empreintes idéologiques dans la terminologie linguistique des grammaires de l’égyptien ancien. In S. Bickel, H. W. FischerElfert, A. Loprieno & S. Richter (eds.), Ägyptologen und Ägyptologien zwischen Kaiserreich und Gründung der beiden deutschen Staaten: Reflexionen zur Geschichte und Episteme eines altertumswissenschaftlichen Fachs im 150. Jahr der Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde (Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde Beiheft, 1) (pp. 437- 456). Berlin: Ed. De Gruyter.
  • Meeks, D. (1999). Dictionnaires et lexicographie de l’égyptien ancien: Méthodes et résultats. Bibliotheca Orientalis, 56, 569-594.
  • Moers, G., Widmaier, K., Giewekemeyer, A., Lümers A. & Ernst, R. (eds.) (2013). Dating Egyptian literary texts (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica 11). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Moreno García, J. C. (2014). The Cursed discipline? The peculiarities of Egyptology at the turn of the twenty-first century. In W. Carruthers (ed.), Histories of Egyptology: Interdisciplinary Measures (Routledge Studies in Egyptology, 2) (pp. 50-63). New York: Ed. Routledge.
  • Moreno García, J. C. (2015). Un mito tenaz: el Egipto antiguo o el paraíso perdido en la obra de los egiptólogos de finales del siglo XIX y comienzos del siglo XX..
  • Müller, M., & Uljas, S. (eds.) (2009). Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads IV) Basel, March 19–22, 2009 (Lingua Aegyptia, 17). Göttingen: Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Nyord, R. (2015). Cognitive Linguistics. In J. Stauder-Porchet, A. Stauder & W. Wendrich. (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (pp. 1-11). Los Angeles: Ed. UCLA. Retrieved from: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002k44p6
  • Nyord, R. (2018). “Taking ancient Egyptian mortuary religion seriously”: Why would we, and how could we? Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections, 17, 73-87.
  • Nyord, R. (ed.). (2019). Concepts in Middle Kingdom Funerary Culture: Proceedings of the Lady Wallis Budge Anniversary Symposium Held at Christ’s College, Cambridge, 22 January 2016 (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East, 102). Leiden: Brill.
  • Oréal, E. (1999). Contact linguistique: le cas du rapport entre le grec et le copte. Lalies, 19, 289- 306.
  • Oréal, E. (2011). Les particules en égyptien ancien: De l’ancien égyptien à l’égyptien classique (Bibliothèque d’Égyptologie, 152). Cairo: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.
  • Oréal, E. (2014). Noun phrase syntax and definiteness marking: A new explanation for the morphology of Earlier Egyptian participles. In E. Grossman, S. Polis, A. Stauder & J. Winand (eds.), On forms and functions: Studies in ancient Egyptian grammar (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 1) (pp. 173-200). Hamburg: Ed. Widmaier. Oréal, E., & Winand, J. (fc.). Negation in Ancient Egyptian (The Mouton Companions to Ancient Egyptian, 3). Berlin: De Gruyter.
  • Peust, C. (1999). Egyptian phonology: An introduction to the phonology of a dead language. Göttingen: Peust & Gutschmidt.
  • Polis, S. & Stauder, A. (2014). The verb ib and the Construction ib=f r sDm: On modal semantics, graphemic contrasts, and gradience in grammar. In E. Grossman, S. Polis, A. Stauder & J. Winand (eds.), On forms and functions: Studies in ancient Egyptian grammar (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 1) (pp. 201-231). Hamburg: Ed. Widmaier.
  • Polotsky, H. J. (1944). Études de syntaxe copte. Le Caire: Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale.
  • Polotsky, H. J. (1965). Egyptian tenses. Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities Proceedings, 2/5, 1-25.
  • Polotsky, H. J. (1976). Les transpositions du verbe en égyptien classique. Israel Oriental Studies, 6, 1-50.
  • Polotsky, H .J. (1987). Egyptology, Coptic studies and the Egyptian language. In J. Ray (ed.), Lingua sapientissima: A seminar in honour of H. J. Polotsky (pp. 5-21). Cambridge: Faculty of Oriental Studies.
  • Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. London: Collier-MacMillan.
  • Reintges, Ch. (1994). Egyptian root-and-pattern morphology. In F. Junge, F. Kammerzell & A. Loprieno (eds.) (1994). Proceedings of the third international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads III); Yale, April 4-9, 1994 (Lingua Aegyptia, 4) (pp. 213-244). Göttingen: Ed. Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Reintges, Ch. (1997). Passive voice in Older Egyptian: A morpho-syntactic study (HIL Dissertations, 28). The Hague: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
  • Ridealgh, K. (2016). Polite like an Egyptian? Case studies of ‘politeness’ in the Late Ramesside letters. Journal of Politeness Research, 12(2), 245-266.
  • Rosmorduc, S. (2015). Computational Linguistics in Egyptology. In J. Stauder-Porchet, A. Stauder & W. Wendrich (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (pp. 1-12). Los Angeles: UCLA. Retrieved from: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002jh4wt
  • Satzinger, H. & Shisha-Halevy, A. (1999). The Snark is dead (Pascal Vernus, Les parties du discours en Moyen Égyptien. Autopsie d'une théorie). Lingua Aegyptia, 6, 167-176.
  • De Saussure, F. (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne and Paris: Payot.
  • Schenkel, W. (1980). Thesen zum ägyptischen Sprachunterricht. Göttinger Miszellen, 40, 81-97.
  • Schenkel, W. (1988). Aktuelle Perspektiven der ägyptischen Grammatik. Bibliotheca Orientalis, 45, 269-289.
  • Schenkel, W. (1991). Tübinger Einführung in die klassisch-ägyptische Sprache und Schrift. Tübingen: pagina. Schenkel, W. (2012). Da capo: Zur Formenbildung des Präteritums sDm=f / rDi=f der Verben II.red. Göttinger Miszellen, 233, 69-74.
  • Schneider, Th., & Raulwing, P. (eds.) (2013). Egyptology from the First World War to the Third Reich: Ideology, scholarship and individual biographies. Leiden: Brill.
  • Sweeney, D. (2001). Correspondence and dialogue: Pragmatic features in Late Ramesside letterwriting (Ägypten und Altes Testament, 49). Harrassowitz: Wiesbaden.
  • Shisha-Halevy, A. (2007). Topics in Coptic syntax: Structural studies in the Bohairic dialect (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, 160). Leuven: Peeters.
  • Stauder, A. (2013a). L’émulation du passé à l’ère thoutmoside: la dimension linguistique. In Bickel, S. (ed.), Vergangenheit und Zukunft: Studien zum historischen Bewusstsein in der Thutmosidenzeit (Aegyptiaca Helvetica, 22) (pp. 77-125). Basel: Ed. Schwabe.
  • Stauder, A. (2013b). Linguistic dating of Middle Egyptian literary texts (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 12). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Stauder, A. (2014a). Splitting the sDm.n=f? A discussion of written forms in Coffin Texts. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache, 141, 83-96.
  • Stauder, A. (2014b). Splitting the sDm.n=f? A discussion of written forms in Coffin Texts. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache, 141, 195-208.
  • Stauder, A. (2014c). Interpreting written morphology: the sDm.n=f in the Pyramid Texts. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 73, 253-271.
  • Stauder, A. (2014d). The earlier Egyptian passive: voice and perspective (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 14). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Suhr, C. (2016). Die ägyptische “Ich-Erzählung”: Eine narratologische Untersuchung (Göttinger Orientforschungen – Ägypten, 61). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
  • Takács, G. (1999-2007). Etymological dictionary of Egyptian I-III (Handbook of Oriental Studies, 48). Brill: Leiden. Thesaurus Linguae Aegyptiae (2014). Retrieved from: http://aaew.bbaw.de/tla/index.html
  • Thornton, B. (2002). Greek ways: How the Greeks created western civilization. London: Encounter.
  • Traugott, E. C., & Heine, B. (eds.) (1991). Approaches to grammaticalization I-II. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • Uljas, S. (2007). The modal system of earlier Egyptian complement clauses: A study in pragmatics in a dead language (Probleme der Ägyptologie, 26). Leiden: Brill.
  • Uljas, S. (2011). Syncretism and the Earlier Egyptian sDm=f: Speculations on morphological interconnections across paradigms. Lingua Aegyptia, 19, 155-174.
  • Uljas, S. (2013). Linguistic Consciousness. In Stauder-Porchet, J., Stauder, A. and Wendrich, W. (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (pp. 1-11). Los Angeles: UCLA. Retrieved from: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002dn8xd
  • Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66, 143-160.
  • Vernus, P. (1990). Future at issue: Tense, mood and aspect in Middle Egyptian; studies in syntax and semantics (Yale Egyptological Studies, 4). New Haven: Yale Egyptological Seminar.
  • Vernus, P. (1996). Langue littéraire et diglossie. In A. Loprieno (ed.), Ancient Egyptian literature: History and forms (Probleme der Ägyptologie, 10) (pp. 559-564). Leiden: Ed. Brill.
  • Vernus, P. (1997). Les parties du discours en moyen égyptien: Autopsie d’une théorie (Cahiers de la Société d’Égyptologie, 5). Geneva: Société d’Égyptologie de Genève.
  • Vernus, P. (1998). Processus de grammaticalisation dans la langue égyptienne. Comptes Rendus des Séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 142, 191-210.
  • Vernus, P. (2012). Le verbe gm(j): Essai de sémantique lexicale. In E. Grossman, S. Polis & J. Winand (eds.), Lexical Semantics in Ancient Egyptian (Lingua Aegyptia – Studia Monographica, 9) (pp. 387-438). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Vernus, P. (2013). Égyptologie: Une discipline aux prises avec l’exceptionnelle valorisation sociétale de son objet. In S. Bickel, H. W. Fischer-Elfert, A. Loprieno & S. Richter (eds.), Ägyptologen und Ägyptologien zwischen Kaiserreich und Gründung der beiden deutschen Staaten: Reflexionen zur Geschichte und Episteme eines altertumswissenschaftlichen Fachs im 150. Jahr der Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde (Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde Beiheft, 1) (pp. 457-480). Berlin: Ed. De Gruyter.
  • Vernus, P. (2015). ngmgm/gmgm sur la racine √gm (1), “prendre contact, rencontrer, trouver”. In R. Nyord & K. Ryholt (eds.), Lotus and laurel: Studies on Egyptian language and religion in honour of Paul John Frandsen (pp. 419-430). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
  • Vernus, P. (2016). Traditional Egyptian I (Dynamics). In J. Stauder-Porchet, A. Stauder & W. Wendrich (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (pp. 1-24). Los Angeles: UCLA. Retrieved from: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002k6th5
  • Vernus, P. (2019). Euphémisme métonymique ou euphémisme par antiphrase dans l’inscription d’Ourrê(/Rêour): Le verbe xsf et l’ambigüité vectorielle ―ablatif ou allatif― de la préposition r. Göttinger Miszellen, 258, 129-150.
  • Werning, D. A. (ed.). (2017). Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads V) Berlin, February 17-20, 2016 (Lingua Aegyptia, 25). Hamburg: Widmaier.
  • Whitmarsh, T., & Thomson, S. (2013). The romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Winand, J. (1991). Le verbe iy/iw: Unité morphologique et sémantique. In Loprieno, A. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Egyptian Grammar (Crossroads II), Los Angeles, October 17-20, 1990 (Lingua Aegyptia, 1) (pp. 357-387). Göttingen: Ed. Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Winand, J. (1994). Entre sémantique et syntaxe: Pour une classification des lexèmes verbaux en néo-égyptien. In F. Junge, F. Kammerzell & A. Loprieno (eds.), Proceedings of the third international conference on Egyptian grammar (Crossroads III); Yale, April 4-9, 1994 (Lingua Aegyptia, 4) (pp. 349-367). Göttingen: Ed. Seminar für Ägyptologie und Koptologie.
  • Winand, J. (1995). La grammaire au secours de la datation des textes. Revue d’Égyptologie, 46, 187-202.
  • Winand, J. (1999). Un dictionnaire des verbes néo-égyptiens. In Grunert, S. and Hafemann, I. (eds.), Textcorpus und Wörterbuch: Aspekte zur ägyptischen Lexikographie (Probleme der Ägyptologie, 14) (pp. 259-270). Leiden: Brill.
  • Winand, J. (2006). Temps et aspect en égyptien : Une approche sémantique (Probleme der Ägyptologie, 25). Leiden: Brill.
  • Winand, J. (2011). Teaching ancient Egyptian: Between linguistics and philology. In Verbovsek, A., Backes, B. and Jones, C. (eds.), Methodik und Didaktik in der Ägyptologie: Herausforderungen eines kulturwissenschaftlichen Paradigmenwechsels in den Altertumswissenschaften (Ägyptologie und Kulturwissenschaft, 4) (pp. 173-184). München: Fink.
  • Winand, J. (2012). A dictionary, please! The Leipzig call (30/11/2012). In Das Altägyptische Wörterbuch und die Lexikographie der ägyptisch-Koptsichen Sprache, 29-30 novembre 2012. Leipzig: Sächsische Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Retrieved from: https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/134167
  • Winand, J. (2015). A new dictionary of Ancient Egyptian (27/08/2015). In The Eleventh International Association of Egyptologists Congress. Florence. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/15421103/A_new_dictionary_of_Ancient_Egyptian
  • Winand, J. (2018). Late Egyptian. In Stauder-Porchet, J., Stauder, A. and Wendrich, W. (eds.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology (pp. 1-30). Los Angeles: UCLA. Retrieved from: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002kdgjj
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. London: Macmillan.
  • In R. Da Riva & J. Vidal (eds.), Descubriendo el antiguo oriente: pioneros y arqueólogos de Mesopotamia y Egipto a finales del siglo XIX y principios del siglo XX (pp. 103-122). Barcelona: Bellaterra