La superación de la polémica de la conquistadel enfrentamiento Sepúlveda-Las Casas a las propuestas de Acosta

  1. Francisco Castilla Urbano 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, España
Revista:
Revista Inclusiones: Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales

ISSN: 0719-4706

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 2

Número: 1

Páxinas: 29-55

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Revista Inclusiones: Revista de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales

Resumo

The process of engagement and awareness of Spanish society on the conquest of America in the first half of the sixteenth century completes in the Board of Valladolid (1550-1551). During that period, the existence of two parties who have radically different views of Indians affairs will lead to two ways of conceiving the natives of the New World and two proposals for action competing with each other in relation to them; besides, a memory of what was done emerges, in which the analysis about the actions of the conquistadors and encomenderos are also valuated from irreconcilable perspectives. After the discussion of Sepúlveda-Las Casas, the overcoming of these controversial visions and the back to a path of consensus which poses the beginning of the colonial period will be expressed in the writings of the Jesuit José de Acosta.