The Europe of Brexita corpus-assisted discourse study of identities in the press

  1. Pena Díaz, Carmen 1
  2. Sánchez Ramos, María del Mar 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Revista:
Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

ISSN: 1576-4737

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Monografía: La escritura académica en el contexto universitario del siglo XXI

Número: 88

Páginas: 225-234

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.5209/CLAC.72672 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación

Resumen

Partiendo de la perspectiva de los estudios del discurso asistido por corpus (Baker et al., 2008), este artículo investigará la construcción de diferentes identidades mediante el lenguaje utilizado sobre el Brexit en el diario español El País y el británico The Guardian para así examinar cómo se construyen dichas identidades a través del discurso mediático en el momento posterior al referéndum del Brexit (2016-2018). El discurso mediático en torno al Brexit se examina bajo el prisma del poder mediático. Para llevar a cabo el análisis se ha utilizado un corpus comparable formado por artículos periodísticos originales sobre el Brexit, identificando palabras clave estadísticamente significativas en comparación con un corpus de referencia con el objetivo de proporcionar un ejemplo de cómo la prensa británica y española construyen la identidad alrededor de un mismo tema

Información de financiación

This research was carried out within the framework of the project Original, translated and interpreted representations of the refugee cris(e)s: methodological triangulation within corpus-based discourse studies (PID2019-108866RB-I00 / AEI / 10.13039/501100011033) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aluthman, E. (2018). A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of the discursive representation of immigration in the EU referendum debate. Arab world english journal, 9(4), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.2
  • Babha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
  • Baker, P.,& McEnery, T. (2005). A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of language and politics 4(2), 197-226. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.4.2.04bak
  • Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & Khosravinik, M. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & society 19(3): 273-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
  • Baker, P. (2010). Sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Baker, P., Costas, G., & McEnery, T. (2013). Sketching Muslims: a corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998-2009. Applied linguistics 34(3), 255-278. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048
  • Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. Annual review of anthropology 29(1), 447-466. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
  • Bondi, M. (2001). Perspectives on keywords and keyness. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (eds.), Keyness in texts (pp. 1-18). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.41.01bon
  • Branun, J., and Charteris-Black, J. (2015) The Edward Snowden affair: a corpus study of the British press. Discourse and communication 9(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481314568544
  • Calzada Pérez, M. (2017). Corpus-based methods for comparative translation and interpreting studies: mapping differences and similarities with traditional and innovative tools. Translation and Interpreting Studies 12(2), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.12.2.03cal
  • Cap, P. (2019). ‘Britain is full to bursting point’: immigration themes in the Brexit discourse on the UK independence party. In . Koller, S. Kopf & M. Miglbauer (eds.), Discourses of Brexit (pp. 69-85-120). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-5
  • Duque, E. (2014). Análisis de contenido mediante análisis de palabras clave. Mediaciones sociales. Revista de ciencias sociales y de la comunicación, 13, 39-73.
  • Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2019). Incorporating text dispersion into keyword analyses. Corpora, 14(1), 77-104.
  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.
  • Fairclough, N. (2009). Language, reality and power. In Culpeper, J., Katamba, F., Kerswill, P., Wodak, R., and McEnery, T. (eds.) English Language: Description, Variation and Context (pp. 512-522). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Fox, J., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008). The `here and now' of everyday nationhood. Ethnicities 8(4), 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968080080040103
  • Glaas, S. (2016). A corpus-assisted study of British newspaper discourse on the European Union and a potential membership referendum. PhD Thesis, University of Birminghan, UK.
  • Guillory, J. (1993). Cultural capital, the problem of literary canon formation. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226310015.001.0001
  • Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Hall, S., & Du Gay, P. (1996) Questions of cultural identity. London: Sage Publications.
  • Jaworska, S. (2016). Using a corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS) approach to investigate constructions of identities in media reporting surrounding mega sport events: the case of the London Olympics 2012. In I. Lamond & L. Platt (eds.), Critical events studies: approaches to research (pp. 149-174). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_8
  • Jeffreys, L., & Walker, B. (2017). Keywords in the press: the new labour years. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Liu, M., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Discursive constructions of scientific (un) certainty about the health risks of China’s air pollution: a corpus-assisted discourse study. Language and communication 60, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.01.006
  • Lutzky, U., & Kehoe, A. (2019). ‘Friends don’t let friends go Brexiting without a mandate’: changing discourses of Brexit in The Guardian. In V. Koller, S. Kopf & M. Miglbauer (eds.), Discourses of Brexit (pp. 104-120). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-7
  • Marchi, A., & Taylor, Ch. (2009). If on a winter´s night two researchers: a challenge to assumptions of soundness of interpretation. Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines (CADAAD) Journal 3(1), 1-20.
  • Mole, R. (2007). Discursive constructions of identity in European politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591301
  • Partington, A. (2004). Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In A. Partington, J., Morley & L. Haarman (eds.) Corpora and discourse (pp. 9-18). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
  • Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, Ch. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse. Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55
  • Partington, A. (2014). Mind the gaps. The role of corpus linguistics in researching absences. International journal of corpus linguistics 19(1):,118-146. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.1.05par
  • Partington, A., & Taylor, Ch. (2018). The language of persuasion in politics. An introduction. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315177342
  • Pena- Díaz, C- In press/2022. Transeditando el Brexit. Discurso y Sociedad.
  • Sánchez Ramos, M. M. In press/2022. Constructing identities in crisis situations: a study of the volunteer in the Spanish and English press. In. I. E. Chiluwa (ed.), Discourse, media and conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scott, M. (2010). Problems in investigating keyness, or clearing the undergrowth and marking out trails. In M. Bondi & Scott (eds.), Keyness in texts (pp. 43-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.41.04sco
  • Scott, M., & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amstendam: John Benjamins Publishing.
  • Stubbs, M. (2001). Words and phrases. Studies in lexical semantics. London: Blackwell.
  • Taylor, Ch. (2014). Investigating the representation of migrants in the UK and Italian press: A cross-linguistic corpus-assisted discourse analysis. International journal of corpus linguistics 19(3), 368-400. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.3.03tay
  • Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
  • Van Dijk, T. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H.E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Vessey, R. (2013). Challenges in cross-linguistic corpus assisted discourse studies. Corpora 8(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0032
  • Vessey, R. (2016). Language and Canadian media: representations, ideologies, policies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Wenzl, N. (2019). ‘This is about the kind of Britain we are’: national identities as constructed in parliamentary debates about EU membership. In V. Koller, S. Kopf & M. Miglbauer (eds), Discourses of Brexit (pp. 32-47). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351041867-3
  • White, H. (1980). The value of narrativity in the representation of reality. Critical Inquiry 7(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1086/448086
  • Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about – a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak,, & M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1-13). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n1
  • Wodak, R., De Cilia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The discoursive contstruction of national identity. Endinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.