Desigualdades sociales en movilidad durante y después de la covid-19 asociadas al confinamiento en el área metropolitana de Madrid (España)

  1. Adrián Glodeanu 1
  2. Usama Bilal 2
  3. Pedro Gullón 3
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health
  3. 3 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Liburua:
Una perspectiva integrada: aportaciones desde las Geografías Económica, Regional y de los Servicios para la cohesión y la competitividad territorial
  1. Cándida Gago García (ed. lit.)
  2. Juan Córdoba Ordóñez (ed. lit.)
  3. Mª Pilar Alonso Logroño (ed. lit.)
  4. Rosa Mª Jordá Borrell (ed. lit.)
  5. Jesús Ventura Fernández (ed. lit.)

Argitaletxea: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

ISBN: 978-84-123678-0-5

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Orrialdeak: 112-121

Biltzarra: Jornadas de Geografía Económica (9. 2020. Madrid)

Mota: Biltzar ekarpena

Laburpena

Spain has been one of the most affected regions by the COVID-19 worldwide, and Madrid its most affected city. In response to this, the Spanish government enacted a strict lockdown in late March, that was gradually eased until June. We explored differentials in mobility by area-level deprivation in the functional area of Madrid, before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown. We used cell phone-derived mobility indicators (% of the population leaving their area) from the National Institute of Statistics (INE), and a composite measure of deprivation from the Spanish Society of Epidemiology (SEE). We computed changes in mobility with respect to pre-pandemic levels, and explored spatial patterns and associations with deprivation. We found that levels of mobility before COVID-19 were slightly higher in areas with lower deprivation. The economic hibernation period resulted in very strong declines in mobility, most acutely in low deprivation areas. These differences weakened during the re-opening, and levels of mobility were similar by deprivation once the lockdown was lifted. Given the existence of important socioeconomic differentials in COVID-19 exposure, it is key to ensure that these interventions do not widen existing social inequalities.