Thinking the unthinkablethe design of disruptive visions for land use and transport integration

  1. Julio A. Soria Lara 1
  2. Rocío Cascajo
  3. Amor Ariza Álvarez 1
  4. Rosa M. Arce Ruiz 1
  5. Francisco Aguilera Benavente 2
  6. Cristina López García de Leaniz 1
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

  2. 2 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

Liburua:
R-evolucionando el transporte [Recurso electrónico]: XIV Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte. Universidad de Burgos 6, 7 y 8 de julio 2021
  1. Hernán Gonzalo Orden (coord.)
  2. Marta Rojo Arce (coord.)

Argitaletxea: Servicio de Publicaciones e Imagen Institucional ; Universidad de Burgos

ISBN: 978-84-18465-12-3

Argitalpen urtea: 2021

Orrialdeak: 2411-2426

Biltzarra: Congreso de Ingeniería del Transporte (14. 2021. Burgos)

Mota: Biltzar ekarpena

Laburpena

Transport Scenario-Building is a well-established methodology to investigate strategic decisions for cities and its transport systems. It is often used to examine different futures where there is considerable uncertainty or where the business-as-usual is no longer appropriate. While the use of participatory approaches in Transport Scenario-Building has resulted in more democratic and implementable outcomes, the usefulness of those approaches is limited when the generation of disruptive transport futures and unusual policy solutions are considered. This paper addresses the abovementioned issue by presenting a participatory approach aimed to obtain disruptive visions on land use and transport by 2050. The context of the Metropolitan Area of Madrid (Spain) is taken as case study. The novel approach incorporates disruptive factors about city futures - “wild cards”- during the participatory visioning process, triggering an unconventional thinking from participants. First, a total of 139 people were engaged by using semi-structured interviews on the future of land use and transport in the case study. Each semi-structured interview explored the desired future for each participant as well as disruptive futures according to “wild cards” previously established. Second, responses were transcribed, coded, and analysed resulting in seven different future narratives. Third, a group of 20 experts in innovation and strategic thinking evaluated the disruptive level of each future narrative with respect to a business-as-usual scenario. The paper shows the methodological process, the future narratives obtained, and reflects on the capacity of this participatory approach to generate disruptive future visions for land use and transport.