Rendimiento académico y satisfacción de los estudiantes universitarios hacia el método flipped classroom

  1. Espada, María 1
  2. Rocu Gómez, Patricia 1
  3. Navia, José Antonio 1
  4. Gómez-López, Maite 1
  1. 1 Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03n6nwv02

Journal:
Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado

ISSN: 1989-6395,  1138-414X

Year of publication: 2020

Issue Title: Miscelánea

Volume: 24

Issue: 1

Pages: 116-135

Type: Article

DOI: 10.30827/PROFESORADO.V24I1.8710 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Profesorado: Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado

Abstract

The flipped classroom is becoming a very popular teaching method in the educational context. However, there are currently not enough scientific investigations that make it possible to support the suitability of the flipped classroom as an ideal method for all areas and educational levels. The object of this research was to analyse academic performance and university student satisfaction and perception of the educational experience of the use of the flipped classroom. The study followed a mixed design which assessed the students’ academic performance using quantitative techniques, and their satisfaction and perception of the flipped classroom method, as well as those of their teachers, using qualitative techniques. The total sample was composed of 94 university students. The results reveal that the students obtained better academic results with the flipped classroom than with the traditional method. The students also highlighted that the flipped classroom method made it possible for them to make a better use of their time and achieve better learning. As disadvantages of this method they underlined the investment in time that was necessary to make suitable use of the method and the importance of the quality of the technological resources used. It can be concluded that the flipped classroom method is suitable for the university context as it enhances the acquisition of the contents and motivates the students, but requires adequate technological means.

€ View funding

Funding information

Este manuscrito forma parte de un proyecto de innovación educativa financiado por la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, cuya referencia es: IE1718.1102.

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
  • Ary, C., Cheser, L., Sorensen, C.K. & Walker, D. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education (8th Ed). Wadsworth: Belmont, C.A.
  • Barrero, B. (2018) Estudios sobre propuestas y experiencias de innovación educativa. Editorial. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 22(4), 1-10.
  • Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Revised Edition. Elsevier Inc.
  • Commission, E. (2018). COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying the document Proposal for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Key Competences for LifeLong Learning. Brussels: Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52018SC0014.
  • Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W.-C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 1-21. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910
  • Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Kinshuk, & Chen, N.S. (2014). Is FLIP enough? Or should we use the FLIPPED model instead? Computers & Education, 79, 16-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.07.004
  • Choi, J., & Lee, Y. (2018). To what extent does ‘flipping’ make lessons effective in a multimedia production class? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 3-12. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1123105
  • Delgado, M. A., & del Villar, F. (1994). El análisis de contenido en la investigación de la enseñanza de la Educación Física. Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 1, 25-44.
  • Delozier, S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141–151. doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
  • Espiñeira, E. M., Muñoz-Cantero, J. M., & Zeimer, M. F. (2012). La autoevaluación y el diseño de planes de mejora en centros educativos como proceso de investigación e innovación en Educación Infantil y Primaria. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 15(1), 145-155.
  • Gallego Arrufat, M. J., Gámiz Sánchez, V., & Gutiérrez Santiuste, E. (2010). El futuro docente ante las competencias en el uso de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación para enseñar. [Enseñanza y formación; Estudiante para profesor; Tecnología de la educación; Competencias docentes]. (34). doi: 10.21556/edutec.2010.34.418
  • Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1988). Etnografía y diseño cualitativo en investigación educativa. Madrid: Morata.
  • Hernández Requena, S. (2008). El modelo constructivista con las nuevas tecnologías: aplicado en el proceso de aprendizaje. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 5(2), 26-35.
  • Jordan, C., Pérez, M. J., & Sanabria, E. (2014). Investigación del impacto en un aula de matemáticas al utilizar flip education. Pensamiento Matemático, 4(2), 9-22.
  • Kashada, A., Li, H., & Su, C. (2017). Adoption of Flipped Classrooms in K-12 Education in Developing Countries: Challenges and Obstacles. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(10), 147-157. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v12i10.7308
  • Khanova, J., Roth, M. T., Rodgers, J. E., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2015). Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum. Medical Education, 49(10), 1038-1048. doi: doi:10.1111/medu.12807
  • Kim, J.Y. (2018). A study of students’ perspectives on a flipped learning model and associations among personality, learning styles and satisfaction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 314-324. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2017.1286998
  • Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629-648. doi: 10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6
  • Lewis, C. E., Chen, D. C., & Relan, A. (2018). Implementation of a flipped classroom approach to promote active learning in the third-year surgery clerkship. The American Journal of Surgery, 215(2), 298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.08.050
  • Liebert, C. A., Lin, D. T., Mazer, L. M., Bereknyei, S., & Lau, J. N. (2016). Effectiveness of the Surgery Core Clerkship Flipped Classroom: a prospective cohort trial. The American Journal of Surgery, 211(2), 451-457.e451. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.004
  • López, M. C., León, M. J., & Pérez-García, P. (2018). El enfoque por competencias en el contexto universitario español. La visión del profesorado. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 36(2), 529-545. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.2.314351
  • Mothibi, G. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between E-Learning and Students' Academic Achievement in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(9), 1-5.
  • Navaridas Nalda, F., & Jiménez Trens, M. A. (2016). Concepciones de los estudiantes sobre la eficacia de los ambientes de aprendizaje universitarios. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 34(2), 503-519. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/rie.34.2.239481
  • Nieto Martín, S. (2011). Principios, métodos y técnicas esenciales para la investigación educativa. Madrid: Dykinson.
  • Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped Classroom Approach. World Journal on Educational Technology, 8(2), 98-105.
  • Padilla, J. L., González, A., & Pérez, C. (1998). Elaboración del cuestionario. In A. J. R. Tejada, J. S. F. Prados & C. P. Meléndez (Eds.), Investigar mediante encuestas: fundamentos teóricos y aspectos prácticos. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Rocco, T., Linda, Gallagher, S., & Pérez-Prado, A. a. (2003). Taking the Next Step: Mixed Methods Research in Organizational Systems. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 21(1), 19-29. doi: citeulike-article-id:3441379
  • Ruíz, J. L. (2012). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Deusto: Universidad de Deusto.
  • Sadín, M. P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en educación: fundamentos y tradiciones: McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España.
  • Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of Flipped Classroom on students' learning experiences: A Self-Determination Theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368-378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011
  • Simpson, V., & Richards, E. (2015). Flipping the classroom to teach population health: Increasing the relevance. Nurse Education in Practice, 15(3), 162-167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2014.12.001
  • Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514-524. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056
  • Zainuddin, Z., & Attaran, M. (2016). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: a case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660-670. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1102079
Data source: Dialnet