El  arbitraje como foro de resolución de controversias en los contenciosos relacionados con el cambio climático

Fernández Pérez, Ana

doi:10.20318/CDT.2022.7191

El arbitraje como foro de resolución de controversias en los contenciosos relacionados con el cambio climático

Fernández Pérez, Ana

Journal:

Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

ISSN: 1989-4570

Year of publication: 2022

Volume: 14

Issue: 2

Pages: 456-492

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20318/CDT.2022.7191 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR Open access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Sustainability is the main challenge for humanity. At the current moment in history, the sustainability challenge is a direct consequence of human activity. Addressing challenges, requires action and costs, and the distribution of costs is a querulous, political issue. Climate change-related disputes already occupy numerous state and international courts, can arbitration tribunals play a role in resolving such or similar disputes? This study aims to examine arbitration as a forum for dispute resolution in an environmental and climate change–related case that can play a role in promoting compliance with international climate change law. This question arises from the fact that international climate change law has entered a new phase, while the number of disputes related to the environment and climate change has recently increased. The lack of an enforcement mechanism under the Paris Agreement will lead to new problems. The research result shows that arbitration, as one of the means of dispute resolution, becomes an alternative solution to address this issue. Procedural flexibility, high levels of expertise among arbitrators and the ability to enforce awards in virtually any country in the world under the New York Convention are some of the attributes of arbitration that make it an attractive and effective method for resolving climate change disputes. These qualities allow parties to arbitration to set the rules that best suit the needs of their case, from setting the timing of the parties’ briefs to creating rules for the presentation of evidence, the request for documents and participation in hearings. In addition, the parties also play a key role in the appointment of arbitrators, who are experts in the matters in dispute and whose training and experience enables them to fully understand highly specialised and technically complex arguments and evidence. Arbitration has the function of creating predictability and certainty, so this forum could serve to promote compliance with international climate change law.

Bibliographic References

A. Blanc Altemir, “Reglamento facultativo de la Corte Permanente de Arbitraje para el arbitraje de las controversias relativas a los recursos naturales y/o al medio ambiente”, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, vol. LV, nº 1, 2003, pp. 506–511;
A. Boute, “Combating Climate Change through Investment Arbitration”, Fordham Int’l L. J., vol. 35, nº 3, 2012, pp. 613–664;
A. de Bossart, “Initial Views on Approaches to Quantum in Climate Clange-Related Arbitration”, Global Arbitrattion Review, 13 octubre 2020
A. Fernández Pérez, “La necesaria adaptación de los acuerdos internacionales de inversiones y del arbitraje de inversiones al ‘desarrollo sostenible’”, Desarrollo sostenible en el siglo XXI: economía, sociedad y medio ambiente (B. Larraz Iribas y A. Fernández Pérez, eds.), Madrid, Iprolex, 2016, pp. 87-123.
A. Fernández Pérez, “Los contenciosos arbitrales contra España al amparo del Tratado sobre la Carta de la Energía y la necesaria defensa del Estado”, Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. 7, nº 2, 2014, pp. 369–397
A. Giddens, “The Politics of Climate Change”, Policy & Politics, vol. 43, nº 2, 2015.
A. Giddens, The Politics of Climate Change, 2ª ed., Cambridge, Polity Press, 2011
A. Magnusson, “Climate Disputes and Sustainable Development: Bridging the enforceability gap”, International Arbitration in the Energy Sector, Oxford University Publishing, 2018, p. 398.
A. Michelot, “La justice climatique et l’Accord de Paris sur le climat”, Revue juridique de l’environnement, vol. 41, nº 1, 2016, pp. 71–79
A. Nogueira López, “Responsabilidad por daños ambientales”, La responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administración Pública. Estudio general y ámbitos sectoriales (T. Quintana López, dir. y A. Casares Marcos, coord.), 2ª ed., Valencia, Tirant lo Blach, 2013, pp. 1225–1260
A. Rest, “An International Court for the Environment: The Role of the Permanent Court of Arbitration”, Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 1999, nº 4, pp, 107–124, esp. p. 118;
A. Ross, “‘The PCA and Climate Change”, Global Arbitration Review, 10 diciembre 2015;
A. Silverman, “Energy Justice. The Intersection of Human Rights and Climate justice”, The Routledge Handbook of Human Rights and Climate Governance (S. Duyck, ed.), Londres / Nueva York, Routledge, 2018
A. Spada Jiménez, Justicia climática y eficiencia procesal, Cizur Menor, Aranzadi, 2021.
A. Spain, “Beyond Adjudication: Resolving International Resource Disputes in an Era of Climate Change”, Stanford Environmental L. J., vol. 30, 2011, pp. 343–390,
A.C. Kiss, ‘Environmental Disputes and the Permanent Court of Arbitration’, HagueYearb. Int’l L., vol. 16, 2003, pp. 41–46;
A.E. Dessler, Introduction to Modern Climate Change, 3ª ed., Cambridge (NY), Cambridge University Press, 2022.
A.F. Dlugolecki, “Climate Change and the Insurance Industry”, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, vol. 24, nº 4, 2000, p. 582–601 [˂https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1111/1468–0440.00084.pdf˃].
A.J. Menaker, “The Trail Smelter Dispute: United States of America v. Canada (Trail Smelter), Award, April 16, 1938 and March 11, 1941”, Arbitrating for peace: how arbitration made a difference, Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2016, pp. 55–77.
A.–S. Tabau y C. Cournil, “Nouvelles perspectives pour la justice climatique (Cour du District de La Haye, 24 juin 2015, Fondation Urgenda contre Pays–Bas)”, Revue Juridique de l’Environnement, 2015, nº 4, pp. 672–693.
A.–S. Tabau, “Évaluation de l’Accord de Paris sur le climat à l’aune d’une norme globale de transparence”, Revue juridique de l’environnement, vol. 41, nº 1, 2016, p. 56–70.
B. Mayer, The International Law on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
B. Soro Mateo, “Reflexiones sobre la hipótesis de un recurso climático en España”, Medio Ambiente & Derecho: Revista electrónica de derecho ambiental, nº 37, 2020.
B. Stern, “Un petit pas de plus: l’instalation de la société civile dans l’arbitrage CIRDI entre Etat et investisseur”, Rev. arb., 2007, pp. 3–43;
C. Brown, “International, Mixed, and Private Disputes Arising Under the Kyoto Protocol”, J. Int’l Disp. Settl., vol. 1, nº 2, 2010, pp. 447–473.
C. Brown, “The Settlement of Disputes arising in Flexibility Mechanism Transactions under the Kyoto Protocol”, Arb. Int’l, vol. 21, nº 3, 2005, pp. 361–389;
C. Buys, “The Tensions between Confidentiality and Transparency in International Arbitration”, Am. Rev. Int’l Arb., vol. 14, 2003, pp. 121 ss;
C. Kessedjian, “De quelques pistes pour l’encadrement procédural de l’intervention des amici curiae”, European journal of law reform, vol. 8, 2006, pp. 29–111;
C. Kessedjian, “The Hague Rules on Business and Human Rights Arbitration ou comment l’arbitrage et la médiation peuvent renforcer le respect des droits de l’homme par les entreprises”, Journ. dr. int., vol. 148, nº 1, 2021, pp. 71–88.
C. Knahr, “Transparency, Third Party Participation and Access to Documents in International Investment Arbitration”, Arb. Int’l, vol. 23, nº 2, 2007, pp. 327–355.
C. Streck y J. Lin, “Making Markets Work: A Review of CDM Performance and the Need for Reform”, Eur. J. Int’l L., vol. 19, nº 2, 2008, pp. 409–442.
C. Voigt, Sustainable Development as a Principle of International Law: Resolving Conflicts between Climate Measures and WTO Law, Leiden, Nijhoff, 2009.
C.L. Beharry y M.E. Kuritzky, “Going Green: Managing the Environment Through International Investment Arbitration”, Am. Univ. Int’l L. Rev., vol. 30, nº 3, 2015, pp. 383–429.
C.M.J. Kröner, “The Work of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Field of Environmental Dispute Resolution”, International Conference on Global Environmental Governance: Rome – Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 20–21 May 2010, Roma, Istituto Superiore per la protezione e la ricerca ambientale (ISPRA), 2011, pp. 277–281, esp. p. 280.
C.P.R. Romano, The Peaceful Settlement of International Environmental Disputes: A Pragmatic Approach, La Haya, Kluwer Law International 2000, pp. 41 y 44.
Comisión Europea, “Comunicación de la Comisión al Parlamento Europeo, al Consejo Europeo, al Consejo, al Comité Económico y Social Europeo y al Comité de las Regiones: El Pacto Verde Europeo”, Bruselas, 11.12.2019, COM (2019) 640 final.
D. Bodansky, “The role of the international court of justice in addressing Climate Change: Some preliminary reflections”, Arizona State L. J., vol 49, 2017, pp. 689–712.
D. Estrin y P. Galvao Ferreira, “Advancing Climate Justice: The New IBA Model Statute for Proceedings Challenging Government Failure to Act on Climate Change” [˂https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349621697_Advancing_Climate_Justice_the_New_IBA_Model_Statute_for_Proceedings_Challenging_Government_Failure_to_Act_on_Climate_Change˃].
D. Irvine, L. Bud, S. Ison y G. Kitching, “The environmental effects of peak hour air traffic congestion: The case of London Heathrow Airport”, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 55, June 2016, pp. 67–73.
D. Klein, M.P. Carazo, M. Doelle, J. Bulmer y A. Higham (eds.), The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Analysis and commentary, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2017.
D. Paraguacuto-Mahéo y C. Lecuyer-Thrieffry, “Emergency Arbitrator: a New Player in the Field - The French Perspective”, Fordham Int’l L. Rev., vol. 40, nº 3, 2017, p. 749-797;
D. Ratliff, “Dispute Resolution and Environmental Security”, Hague Yearb. Int’l L., vol. 20, 2007, p. 65–73.
D.P. Ratliff, “The PCA optional rules for arbitration of disputes relating to natural resources and/or the environment”, Leiden J. Int’l L., vol. 14, nº 4, 2001, pp. 887–896, esp. p. 890.
D.R. Kalderimis, “International Arbitration in a Brave New World”, Arb. Int’l, vol. 34, nº 4, 2018, pp. 533–555.
E. Levine, “Amicus Curiae in International Investment Arbitration: The Implications of an Increase in Third–Party Participation”, Berkeley J. Int’l L., vol. 29, nº 1, 2011, pp. 200–224.
E. Montoya Zorrilla, “Towards a Credible Future: Uses of Technology in International Commercial Arbitration”, German Arb. J., vol. 16, nº 2, 2018, pp. 106-114.
E. Shirlow, “Dawn or a new era?: the UNCITRAL Rules and UN Convention on Transparency in Treaty–Based Investor–State Arbitration”, ICSID review: foreign investment law journal, vol. 31, nº 3, 2016, pp. 622–654
E. Viñuales, Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 253 ss.
E.A. Lloyd y T.G. Shepherd, “Climate Change Attribution and Legal Contexts: Evidence and the Role of Storylines”. Climatic Change, 2021, pp. 167 ss.
F. Baetens, “The Kyoto Protocol in Investor–State Arbitration: Reconciling Climate Change and Investment Protection Objectives”, Sustainable Development in World Investment Law (M.–C. e Cordonier Segger, M.W. Gehring y A. Newcombe, eds.), Alphen aan den Rijn, Wolters Kluwer, 2011, pp. 683–715.
F. Bisalbutr, “The Potential Impact of Climate Change Litigation on Government Policy”, Notre Dame J. Int’l & Comp. L., vol. 11, nº 2, 2021, p. 272–293.
F.J. Pascual Vives, “La institución de amicus curiae y el arbitraje de inversiones”, Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional (Universidad de Navarra), vol. 27, 2011, pp. 353-396.
F.L. López Bustos, “Cambio climático en España: análisis normativo e instrumentos de actuación”, El cambio climático en España: análisis técnico–jurídico y perspectivas (N. Castelló Nicás, dir.), Madrid, Dykinson, 2011, pp. 154–230;
G. de Lassus St–Geniès, “L’Accord de Paris sur le climat: quelques éléments de décryptage”, Revue québécoise de droit international, vol. 28, nº 2, 2015, pp.. 27–51;
H.L. Brendan Casey, “Ten Years Later: Why the ‘Renaissance of Expedited Arbitration’ Should Be the ‘Emergency Arbitration’ of 2020”, J. Int’l Arb., vol. 37, nº 3, 2020, pp. 325-340.
H.M. Osofsky y J. Peel, “The Role of Litigation in Multilevel Climate Change Governance: Possibilities for a Lower Carbon Future?”, Environmental and Planning Law Journal, vol. 30, nº 4, 2013, pp. 303–328;
H.M. Osofsky, “Is Climate Change ‘International’? Litigation’s Diagonal Regulatory Role”, Virginia J. Int’l L., vol. 49, 2009, pp. 587–650;
I. Iruretagoiena Agirrezabalaga, “Atenuación de los rasgos de confidencialidad y privacidad del arbitraje de inversión”, Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. I, nº 1, 2008, pp. 139–164.
IBA Climate Change Justice and Human Rights Task Force Report, Achieving Justice and Human Rights in an Era of Climate Disruption, 2014, p. 144 [˂https://www.ibanet.org/MediaHandler?id=0f8cee12–ee56–4452–bf43–cfcab196cc04˃].
Informe mundial sobre litigios climáticos. Revisión Global 2020 del PNUMA.
J. Levine, “Climate Change Disputes: The PCA, The Paris Agreement and Prospects for Future Arbitrations”, Transnational Dispute Management, vol. 14, nº 1, 2017.
J. Salasky y C. Montineri, “UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty–Based Investor–State”, ASA Bulletin, vol. 31, nº 4, 2013, pp. 744–796;
J. Setzer y R. Byrnes, Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2019 Snapshot, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science 2019.
J. Sullivan y V. Kirsey, “Environmental Policies: A Shield or a Sword in Investment Arbitration?”, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol. 18, nº 1, 2017, pp. 100–130.
J. Tarjuelo, “Fast Track Procedures: A New Trend in Institutional Arbitration”, Disp. Resol. Int’l, vol. 11, núm. 2, 2017, págs. 105-115;
J.C. Fernández Rozas, “Trayectoria y contornos del mito de la confidencialidad en el arbitraje comercial”, Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. II, nº 2, 2009,
J.E. Viñuales, “Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law: The Current State of Play”, Research Handbook on Environment and Investment Law (K. Miles, ed.), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016.
K. Bouwer, “The Unsexy Future of Climate Change Litigation”, Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 30, nº 3, 2018, pp. 483–506.
K. Miles, “Arbitrating Climate Change: Regulatory Regimes and Investor–State Disputes”, Climate Law, vol. I, nº 1, 2010, pp. 63–92;
K.S. Tienhaara, “Third Party Participation in Investment–Environment Disputes: Recent Developments”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, vol. 16, nº 2, 2007, pp. 230–242
L. Bizikova, “On Route to Climate Justice: The Greta Effect on International Commercial Arbitration”, Journ. Int’l Arb., vol. 39, nº 1, 2022, pp. 79-116.
L. Boisson de Chazournes, “La gestion de l’intérêt commun a I’épreuve des enjeux économiques: Le Protocole de Kyoto sur les Changements Climatiques”, Ann. fr. dr. int., vol. 43, 1997, pp. 700–705;
L. Boissson de Chazournes, “The Climate Change Regime: Between a Rock and a Hard Place?”, Fordham Environmental L. Rev., vol. 25, nº 3, 2014, pp. 625–651.
L. Elborough, “International climate change litigation: Limitations and possibilities for international adjudication and arbitration in addressing the challenge of climate change”, New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 21, 2017, pp. 89–131
L. Fache Rousová, M. Giuzio, S. Kapadia, H. Kumar, L. Mazzotta, M. Parker y D. Zafeiris, Climate Change, Catastrophes and the Macroeconomic Benefits of Insurance, EIOPA. 2021 [˂https://op.europa.eu/en/publication–detail/–/publication/d643e71e–e2be–11eb–895a–01aa75ed71a1/language–en˃]
L. Gouifflès y M. Ordoñez, “Climate change in international arbitration, the next big thing?”, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 40, nº 2, 2022, pp. 203–224.
L. Greenwood, “The Canary Is Dead: Arbitration and Climate Change”, J. Int’l Arb., vol. 38, nº 3, 2021, pp. 309–326.
L.J. Kotzé, “Neubauer et al. versus Germany: Planetary Climate Litigation for the Anthropocene?”, German L. J., vol. 22, nº 8, 2021, pp. 1423–1444
M. Averill, “Climate litigation: ethical implications and societal impacts”, Denver Univ. l. Rev., vol. 85, nº 4, 2008, pp. 899– 918.
M. Averill, “Linking Climate Litigation and Human Rights”, Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, vol. 18, nº 2, 2009, pp. 139–147.
M. Broberg y B. Martinez Romera, eds., The third pillar of international climate change policy: on ‘loss and damage’ after the Paris Agreement, Londres, Routledge, 2021
M. Bühler y M. Heitzmann, “The 2017 ICC Expedited Rules: From Softball to Hardball?”, J. Int’l Arb., vol. 34, nº 2, 2017, pp. 121-148.
M. Doelle, “Climate Change and the Use of the Dispute Settlement Regime of the Law of the Sea Convention”, Ocean development and international law: the journal of marine affairs, vo. 37, nos. 3–4, 2007, pp. 319–337.
M. Nino, “Arbitraje internacional y cambio climático”, Aspectos destacados en la lucha frente al cambio climático (F.J. Zamora Cabot, L. Sales Pallarés y M.C. Marullo, dirs), Cizur Menor, Aranzadi Thomson Reuters, 2021, pp. 1-18.
M. Osofsky, “The Continuing Importance of Climate Change Litigation”, Climate Law, vol. I, nº 1, 2010, pp. 3–29.
M. Pallemaerts, “International Environmental Law in the Age of Sustainable Development: A Critical Assessment of the UNCED Process”, Journal of law and commerce, vol. 15, nº 2, 1995–96, pp. 623–676
M. Powers, “Juliana v United States. The next frontier in US climate mitigation?”, Rev. Eur. Comp. and Int’l Environmental L., vol. 27, nº 2, 2018, pp. 199–204.
M. Scopelliti, Non–governmental actors in international climate change law: the case of Arctic Indigenous peoples”, New York, Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, 2022.
M. Torre–Schaub, “La construction d’un droit fondamental à un climat stable: évolutions, difficultés et perspectives”, Rev. int. dr. comp., vol. 74, nº 1 2022, pp. 71–85
M. V. Sánchez Pos, “Del juez al árbitro de emergencia: El impacto de la Ley Modelo en la progresiva atribución de la tutela cautelar a los árbitros en la legislación arbitral española y en otras legislaciones estatales”, Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. 11, nº 2, 2018, pp. 403-442.
M. van de Kerkhof, “The Trailer Smelter Case Re–Examined : Examining the Development of National Procedural Mechanisms to Resolve a Trail Smelter Type Dispute”, Utrecht J. Int’l and Eur. L., vol. 27, nº 73, 2011, pp. 68–83;
M. Vespa, “An Alternative to an International Environmental Court? The PCA’s Optional Arbitration Rules for Natural Resources and/or the Environment”, The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, vol. 2, 2003, pp. 295–331.
M. Westcott, “The UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty–Based Investor–State Arbitration”, Arbitration, vol. 82, nº 3, 2016, pp. 302–305;
M. Wewerinke–Singh, J. Aguon y J. Hunter, “Bringing Climate Change before the International Court of Justice: Prospects for Contentious Cases and Advisory Opinions”, Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives, op. cit., pp. 393–414.
M.–C. Cordonier Segger, “Intergenerational justice in the Paris Agreement on climate change”, Intergenerational justice in sustainable development treaty implementation: advancing future generations rights through national institutions, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2021, pp. 731–753.
N. Chalifour, H. Mcleod–Kilmurray y L.M. Collins, “Climate change. Human rights and private remedies”, The Routledge Handbook of Human Rights and Climate Governance (S. Duyck, ed.), Londres / Nueva York, Routledge, 2018;
N. Schrijver, “The Changing Nature of State Sovereignty”, British Yearb. Int’l L., vol. 70, nº 1, 1999, pp. 65–98,
P. H. Sand, “UNCED and the Development of International Environmental Law”, Journal of natural resources and environmental law, vol. 8, 1992–93, pp. 209–228;
P. McDonald, “Third party funding of climate change arbitration”, PinsentMasons, Out-law / your daily need-to-know, 5 abril 2022 [˂ https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/guides/third-party-funding-climate-change-arbitration˃].
P. Sandonato de León, “L’affaire relatif à l’utilisation des eaux du lac Lanoux. 50 ans d’actualité”, Agenda internacional, vol. 15, nº 26, 2008, pp. 265–291
P. Thieffry, “International Arbitration of Climate–Related Disputes: Prospects for Alternative Dispute Resolution”, Climate Change Litigation: Global Perspectives, op. cit., pp. 464–480.
P.J.H. Jonkman, “Resolution of International Environmental Disputes: a Potential Role for the Permanent Court of Arbitration”, Towards the world governing of the environment, IV International Conference International Court of the Environment Foundation (ICEF), 2–5 June 1994, Venice (Italy), vol. I, Pavía, Iuculano, 1996, pp. 435–463
R. Alnaber, “Emergency Arbitration: Mere Innovation or Vast Improvement Get access Arrow”, Arb. Int’l, vol. 35, núm. 4, 2019, págs. 441-472.
R. Cox, “A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of the Netherlands”, Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 34, nº 2, 2016, pp. 143–163.
R. de Paor, “Climate Change and Arbitration: Annex Time before there won’t be A Next Time”, Journ. Int’l Disp. Settl., vol. 8, nº 1, 2017, pp. 179–215.
R. MacKenzie, “The role of dispute settlement in the climate change regime” (J. Brunnee, M. Doelle y L. Rajamani, eds.), Promoting Compliance in an Evolving Climate Regime, Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 395–417.
R. Verheyen y C. Zengerling, “International Climate Change Cases”, Climate Change: International Law and Global Governance, vol. I, Legal Responses and Global Responsibility (O.C. Ruppel, Ch. Roschmann, K. Ruppel–Schlichting, eds.), Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. 2013, pp. 759–804.
S. Barona Vilar, “Maximización de la eficiencia y búsqueda de la celeridad en el arbitraje: entre el mito, la sublimación y la cuarta revolución industrial (4.0”, Arbitraje. Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones, vol. XI, nº 1, 2018, pp.. 17-53;
S. Borrás Pentinat, “Los litigios climáticos: entre la tutela climática y la fiscalización de las responsabilidades por daños ambientales” Cambio Climático, Energía y Derecho Internacional: Perspectivas de Futuro (R. Giles Carnero, coord.), Cizur Menor, Aranzadi, 2012,
S. Jodoin, R. Faucher y K. Lofts, “Look before you jump Assessing the potential influence of the human rights bandwagon on domestic climate policy”, The Routledge Handbook of Human Rights and Climate Governance (S. Duyck, ed.), Londres / Nueva York, Routledge, 2018
S. Maljean–Dubois, “La mise en route du protocole de Kyoto à la convention–cadre des Nations Unies sur les changements climatiques”, Ann. fr. dr. int., vol. 51, 2005, pp. 433–463.
S. Wilske y Z. Bank, “Is There an (Emerging) Ethical Rule in International Arbitration to Strive for More Climate Friendly Proceedings?”, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, vol. 14, nº 2, 2021, pp. 155–184.
S.D. Andrina, “Green Technology Disputes in Stockholm” (2019), p. [˂https://sccinstitute.com/media/1059447/green–technology–disputes–in–stockholm.pdf˃].
T. Granier, J. Grierson y S. Karsentils, “Arbitration Helping or Hindering the Protection of the Environment and Public Health?”, J. Int’l Arb., vol. 38, nº 3, 2021. pp. 327–344.
T. Meshel, “Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and/or the Environment: Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)”, Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law, Oxford Public International Law, Oxford University Press, 2015 [˂https://www.mpi.lu/fileadmin/mpi/medien/research/MPEiPro/Optional_Rules_for_Arbitration_law–mpeipro–e2810.pdf˃].
T. Meshel, “Optional Rules for Arbitration of Disputes Relating to Natural Resources and/or the Environment: Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) (February 15, 2016)”, MPILux Research Paper 2017 [˂https://ssrn.com/abstract=3426459 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3426459˃].
T. Stephens, International Courts and Environmental Protection, Cambridge, Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, 2009;
W. Kahl y M.P. Weller (eds.), Climate change litigation: a handbook, Múnich– Oxford – Baden–Baden, Nomos, 2021.
W. Lang y H. Schally, “La Convention cadre sur les changements climatiques : un élément du bilan normatif du Sommet de la Terre: la CNUED”, Rev. gen. dr. int. pub., vol. 97, nº 2, 1993, pp. 321–337;
W.J. Miles y M. Lawry–White, “Arbitral Institutions and the Enforcement of Climate Change Obligations for the Benefit of all Stakeholders: The Role of ICSID”, ICSID review: foreign investment law journal, vol. 34, nº 1, 2019, pp. 1–31.
X. Wang y G. Wiser, “The Implementation and Compliance Regimes under the Climate Change Convention and Its Kyoto Protocol”, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, vol. 11, nº 2, pp. 181–198;
Y. Abid, “FDI protection and energy transition: are ISDS adjudicators equipped with the needed legal devices to ease the transition?”, Am. Rev. Int’l Arb., vol. 32, nº 1, 2021, pp. 75–118
Y. Kerbrat, S Maljea–Dubois y M. Wemaëre, “Conférence internationale de Paris sur le climat en décembre 2015: comment construire un accord evolutif dans les temps?”, Journ. dr. int.. vol. 142, nº 4, 2015, pp. 1115–1130;

Data source: Dialnet