Presence of Differences in the Radiofrequency Parameters Applied to Complex Pressure Ulcers: A Secondary Analysis
- Barbas Monjo, Miguel Ángel 1
- Sánchez Romero, Eleuterio Atanasio 234
- Villafañe, Jorge Hugo 5
- Martínez-Rolando, Lidia 6
- García Cuevas, Jara Velasco 1
- Cuenca Zaldívar, Nicolás 789
-
1
Hospital de Guadarrama
info
Hospital de Guadarrama
Guadarrama, España
-
2
Universidad Europea de Madrid
info
- 3 Physiotherapy and Orofacial Pain Working Group, Sociedad Española de Disfunción Craneomandibular yDolor Orofacial (SEDCYDO), 28009 Madrid, Spain
-
4
Universidad Europea de Canarias
info
-
5
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
info
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milán, Italia
-
6
Hospital de Móstoles
info
-
7
Universidad de Alcalá
info
-
8
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro
info
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro
Madrid, España
- 9 Primary Health Center “El Abajón”, Las Rozas de Madrid, 28231 Madrid, Spain
ISSN: 1648-9144
Any de publicació: 2023
Volum: 59
Número: 3
Pàgines: 516
Tipus: Article
Altres publicacions en: Medicina
Resum
Background: Pressure ulcers are a public health problem given the impact that they have on morbidity, mortality and the quality of life and participation of patients who suffer from them. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of differences in the radiofrequency parameters applied to complex pressure ulcers throughout the sessions and between the right and left leg. As a secondary objective, the subjective perceptions of the effects of the treatment by both the patients and the practitioner were analyzed. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a prospective study involving 36 patients from the Hospital de Guadarrama in Madrid, Spain, who presented ulcers in the lower limbs. Ten treatment sessions of radiofrequency were administered with a frequency of one session/week, collecting the data referring to the variables in each of the sessions. The main outcome variables were the radiofrequency parameters automatically adjusted in each session and that referred to the frequency (Hz), maximum and average power (W), absorbed energy by the ulcer (J/cm2) and temperature (°C) reached by the tissues. On the other hand, the subjective perception of the results was evaluated using the Global Response Assessment (GRA), a Likert-type scale that scores the treatment results from 1 (significantly worse) to 5 (significantly better). Likewise, the satisfaction of both the patients and the professional were evaluated using a 10-point numerical scale. Results: The ANOVA test showed significant differences (p < 0.05) throughout the sessions except in patient satisfaction. The ANOVA test showed significant differences (p < 0.05) between both legs and over time in all parameters except for frequency. The presence of significant differences (p < 0.05) was observed over time between legs compared to the initial values in the absorbed energy and in temperature, with higher final values in the absorbed energy in the left leg compared to the right (26.31 ± 3.75 W vs. 17.36 ± 5.66 W) and a moderate effect on both (R2 = 0.471 and 0.492, respectively). The near absence of changes in the satisfaction of both the patients and the professional was observed, while the score in the GRA decreased continuously throughout the sessions. Conclusions: Radiofrequency parameters are indicative of an improved clinical response to ulcers. In addition, higher radiofrequency exposure increases healing capacity. However, the subjective perception of treatment outcomes worsened, which may be related to the chronic nature of the ulcers, leading to patients’ expectations not being met.
Referències bibliogràfiques
- Quiñoz Gallardo, M.D.; Gonzalo Jiménez, E.; Barrientos Trigo, S.; Porcel Gálvez, A.M. Implantación del programa “Centros Comprometidos con la Excelencia en Cuidados” en el Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves. Rev. Española De Salud Pública 2021, 95, e1–e16.
- 2. Padula, W.V.; Delarmente, B.A. The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States. Int. Wound J. 2019, 16, 634–640. [CrossRef]
- 3. Arora, M.; Harvey, L.A.; Glinsky, J.V.; Nier, L.; Lavrencic, L.; Kifley, A.; Cameron, I.D. Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 1, CD012196. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 4. Everett, E.; Mathioudakis, N. Update on management of diabetic foot ulcers: Diabetic foot ulcers. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1411, 153–165. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 5. Mao, X.; Zhu, L. Effects of care bundles for patients with pressure ulcers and the impact on self-care efficacy. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021, 13, 1799–1807.
- 6. Mervis, J.S.; Phillips, T.J. Pressure ulcers: Pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors, and presentation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2019, 81, 881–890. [CrossRef]
- 7. Micah, A.E.; Cogswell, I.E.; Cunningham, B.; Ezoe, S.; Harle, A.C.; Maddison, E.R.; McCracken, D.; Nomura, S.; Simpson, K.E.; Stutzman, H.N.; et al. Tracking development assistance for health and for COVID-19: A review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 204 countries and territories, 1990–2050. Lancet 2021, 398, 1317–1343. [CrossRef]
- 8. Bowers, S.; Franco, E. Chronic Wounds: Evaluation and Management. Am. Fam. Physician 2020, 101, 8.
- 9. Wood, J.; Brown, B.; Bartley, A.; Cavaco, A.M.B.C.; Roberts, A.P.; Santon, K.; Cook, S. Reducing pressure ulcers across multiple care settings using a collaborative approach. BMJ Open Qual. 2019, 8, e000409. [CrossRef]
- 10. Conner-Kerr, T.; Isenberg, R.A. Retrospective analysis of pulsed radiofrequency energy therapy use in the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. Adv. Ski. Wound Care 2012, 25, 253–260. [CrossRef] Medicina 2023, 59, 516 12 of 12
- 11. Ekelem, C.; Thomas, L.; Van Hal, M.; Valdebran, M.; Lotfizadeh, A.; Mlynek, K.; Mesinkovska, N.A. Radiofrequency Therapy and Noncosmetic Cutaneous Conditions. Dermatol. Surg. 2019, 45, 908–930. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 12. Frykberg, R.; Martin, E.; Tallis, A.; Tierney, E. A case history of multimodal therapy in healing a complicated diabetic foot wound: Negative pressure, dermal replacement and pulsed radio frequency energy therapies. Int. Wound J. 2011, 8, 132–139. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 13. Larsen, J.A.; Overstreet, J. Pulsed radio frequency energy in the treatment of complex diabetic foot wounds: Two cases. J. Wound Ostomy Cont. Nurs. 2008, 35, 523–527. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 14. Quarto, G.; Solimeno, G.; Furino, E.; Sivero, L.; Bucci, L.; Massa, S.; Benassai, G.; Apperti, M. “Difficult-to treat” ulcers management: Use of pulse dose radiofrequency. Ann. Ital. Di Chir. 2013, 84, 225–228.
- 15. Clijsen, R.; Leoni, D.; Schneebeli, A.; Cescon, C.; Soldini, E.; Li, L.; Barbero, M. Does the Application of Tecar Therapy Affect Temperature and Perfusion of Skin and Muscle Microcirculation? A Pilot Feasibility Study on Healthy Subjects. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2020, 26, 147–153. [CrossRef]
- 16. Barbas Monjo, M.; Velasco García Cuevas, J.; Rodríguez Lastra, J.; Cuenca Zaldívar, J.N. Radiofrecuencia en la cicatrización de heridas crónicas. Una revisión en hospital de media estancia. Gerokomos 2021, 32, 63–67. [CrossRef]
- 17. Fernández-Carnero, J.; Beltrán-Alacreu, H.; Arribas-Romano, A.; Cerezo-Téllez, E.; Cuenca-Zaldivar, J.N.; Sánchez-Romero, E.A.; Lerma Lara, S.; Villafañe, J.H. Prediction of Patient Satisfaction after Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain with Mulligan’s Mobilization. Life 2023, 13, 48. [CrossRef]
- 18. Peters, K.M.; Killinger, K.A.; Ibrahim, I.A.; Villalba, P.S. The relationship between subjective and objective assessments of sacral neuromodulation effectiveness in patients with urgency-frequency. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2008, 27, 775–778. [CrossRef]
- 19. Liburdy, R.P.; Callahan, D.E.; Harland, J.; Dunham, E.; Sloma, T.R.; Yaswen, P. Experimental evidence for 60 Hz magnetic fields operating through the signal transduction cascade. Effects on calcium influx and c-MYC mRNA induction. FEBS Lett. 1993, 334, 301–308. [CrossRef]
- 20. Yokota, Y.; Tashiro, Y.; Suzuki, Y.; Tasaka, S.; Matsushita, T.; Matsubara, K.; Kawagoe, M.; Sonoda, T.; Nakayama, Y.; Hasegawa, S.; et al. Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer on Tissue Temperature, Muscle Flexibility, and Blood Circulation. J. Nov. Physiother. 2017, 7, 325. [CrossRef]
- 21. García-Sánchez, F.J.; Martínez-Vizcaíno, V.; Rodríguez-Martín, B. Patients’ and Caregivers’ Conceptualisations of Pressure Ulcers and the Process of Decision-Making in the Context of Home Care. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019, 16, 2719. [CrossRef]
- 22. Ballestra, E.; Battaglino, A.; Cotella, D.; Rossettini, G.; Sanchez-Romero, E.A.; Villafane, J.H. ¿Influyen las expectativas de los pacientes en el tratamiento conservador de la lumbalgia crónica? Una revisión narrativa (Do patients’ expectations influence conservative treatment in Chronic Low Back Pain? A Narrative Review). Retos 2022, 46, 395–403. [CrossRef]
- 23. Sánchez Romero, E.A.; Lim, T.; Villafañe, J.H.; Boutin, G.; Riquelme Aguado, V.; Martin Pintado-Zugasti, A.; Alonso Pérez, J.L.; Fernández Carnero, J. The Influence of Verbal Suggestion on Post-Needling Soreness and Pain Processing after Dry Needling Treatment: An Experimental Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4206. [CrossRef]
- 24. Viñals Narváez, A.C.; Sánchez-Sánchez, T.; García-González, M.; Ardizone García, I.; Cid-Verdejo, R.; Sánchez Romero, E.A.; Jiménez-Ortega, L. Psychological and Behavioral Factors Involved in Temporomandibular Myalgia and Migraine: Common but Differentiated Profiles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1545. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- 25. Osses-Anguita, Á.E.; Sánchez-Sánchez, T.; Soto-Goñi, X.A.; García-González, M.; Alén Fariñas, F.; Cid-Verdejo, R.; Sánchez Romero, E.A.; Jiménez-Ortega, L. Awake and Sleep Bruxism Prevalence and Their Associated Psychological Factors in First-Year University Students: A Pre-Mid-Post COVID-19 Pandemic Comparison. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 2452. [CrossRef] [PubMed]