La Protección de los Derechos Laborales en los Alc de Última Generación: Modelo de EE.UU. Vs. Modelo de La UE

  1. Tatsiana Ushakova
Revue:
Revista internacional CONSINTER de direito

ISSN: 2183-6396,  2183-9522

Année de publication: 2017

Volumen: 3

Número: 4

Pages: 415-441

Type: Article

DOI: 10.19135/REVISTA.CONSINTER.00004.16 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Revista internacional CONSINTER de direito

Résumé

This analysis is carried out taking into account the latest trends in the commercial landscape characterized, among other aspects, by the negotiation and adoption of “megaregional” agreements. According to the legal scholars’ doctrines, one of the characteristics of these agreements is their broad scope of contents including commitments in respect of investment, environment and labour rights. The present contribution focuses on a comparative analysis of the labour chapters of the two free trade agreements (FTA) of the “latest generation”: the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which entry into force has been paralyzed due to the trade policy changes of its mayor Partner the United States of America (USA), and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between the European Union and Canada (CETA) recently approved by the European Parliament. However, from the theoretical point of view, it seems interesting to contribute to the discussion on the current models of social clauses by comparing two different approaches promoted respectively by the European Union in the framework of the CETA and by the USA under the TPP. In this sense, it has been compared the content of the social clause, namely the labour rights that are protected, and the control mechanisms to ensure the effective protection of these rights within the two normative systems.

Références bibliographiques

  • Agustí-Panareda, J., Ebert, F. Ch. and LeClercq, D., Social Dimensions of Free Trade Agreements. Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements: Fostering their Consistency with the ILO Standards System, International Labour Office, Geneva, 2014.
  • Agustí-Panareda, J., Ebert, F. Ch. and LeClerq, D., “ILO Labor Standards and Trade Agreements: a Case for Consistency”, Comp. Labor Law & Pol’y Journal, Vol. 36 (2015), pp. 347-380.
  • Amato, T. A., “Labor rights conditionality: United States trade legislation and the international trade order”, in New York University Law Review, Vol. 65 (1990), pp. 79-125.
  • Basu, K., Horn, H., Román, L. and Shapiro, J. (Eds.). International Labor Standards. History, Theory and Policy Options, Blackwell Publishing, EGDI, Malden, Oxford et als., 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754818
  • Bolle, M. J., Overview of Labor Enforcement Issues in Free Trade Agreements, Congressional Research Service, February 22, 2016.
  • Brown, R.C., “Asian and US perspectives on labor rights under international trade agreements compared”, in Marx, A. et al. (Eds.), Global Governance of Labor Rights, Assessing the Effectiveness of Transnational Public and Private Policy Initiatives, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Northampton, 2015, pp. 83-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711467.00011
  • Cimino-Isaacs, C., “Labour standards in the TPP”, in Schott, J. J. and Cimino-Isaacs, C. (Eds.), Assessing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Vol. II: “Innovations in trading rules”, Peterson Institute for International Economics, March 2016, pp. 41-65.
  • Ebbinghaus, B., “European Labor Relations and Welfare-State Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of their ‘Elective Affinities’”, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne Background Paper for Cluster 3: The Welfare State and Industrial Relations Systems Conference on “Varieties of Welfare Capitalism in Europe, North America and Japan” Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, June 11-13, 1998.
  • Elliott, K. A., “Labour standards and the TPP”, in Lim, C. L. et als. (Eds.), The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A Quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012, pp. 100-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236775.019
  • Esping-Andersen, C., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879100100108
  • Gantz, D. A., “The ‘Bipartisan Trade Deal’, Trade Promotion Authority and the Future of U.S. Free Trade Agreements”, Saint Luis University Public Law Review, Vol. XXVIII (2008), pp. 115-154.
  • Gehring, M W. and Cordonier Segger, M.-C. (Eds.), Sustainable Development in World Trade Law, Global Trade and Finance Series nº 9, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 2005.
  • Gil y Gil, J. L. y Ushakova, T., “La Declaración de la OIT relativa a los principios y derechos fundamentales en el trabajo”, Documentación Laboral, nº 59 (1999), pp. 99-112.
  • Green, M. J., and Goodman, M. P., “After TPP: the Geopolitics of Asia and the Pacific”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 38 (2016), nº 4, pp. 19-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2015.1125827
  • Guamán Hernández, A., “La política comercial de la UE y su impacto en los derechos laborales: una aproximación a los posibles efectos de la firma del TTIP y del CETA”, Lex Social, Vol. 6, nº 2 (2016), p. 123-144.
  • Guamán Hernández, A., “Cláusulas laborales en los acuerdos de libre comercio de nueva generación: una especial referencia al contenido laboral del TPP, CETA y TTIP”, Estudios Financieros, Revista de Trabajo y Seguridad Social, nº 398 (2016), pp. 83-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51302/rtss.2016.2272
  • Fergusson, I. F. (Coord.), Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Negotiations and Issues for Congress, Congressional Research Service, March 20, 2015, 56 pp.
  • ILO, Social Dimensions of Free Trade Agreements, International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, 2013.
  • ILO, Studies on Growth with Equity. Assessment of Labour Provisions in Trade and Investment Arrangements, International Labour Office, Geneva, 2016.
  • Joseph, S., Blame it on the WTO? A Human Rights Critique, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199565894.001.0001
  • Kolsky Lewis, M., “The Trans-Pacific Partnership: New Paradigm or Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?”, Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, Vol. 34 (2011), pp. 27-52.
  • Krist, W., Negotiation for a Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, Wilson Center, Pennsylvania, 2012.
  • Lal Das, B., La OMC y el sistema multilateral de comercio, Icaria, Barcelona, 2004.
  • Lee, E.Y.J., “Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) as a US Strategic Alliance Initiative under the G2 System: Legal and Political Implications”, JEAIL, Vol. VIII, 2 (2015), pp. 323-352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14330/jeail.2015.8.2.02
  • Lim, C. L. et als. (Eds.), The Trans-Pacific Partnership. A Quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236775
  • OIT, Cláusulas laborales en los acuerdos comerciales: tendencias recientes y pertinencia para la OIT, Oficina Internacional del Trabajo, Ginebra, 2016.
  • OIT, Cláusulas laborales en los acuerdos comerciales: tendencias recientes y pertinencia para la OIT, Estudios sobre el Crecimiento con Equidad: Resumen ejecutivo del Informe, 29 de septiembre de 2016, Oficina Internacional del Trabajo, Ginebra, 2016.
  • Orbie J. and De Ville, F., “Core labour standards in the GSP regime of the European Union: overshadowed by other considerations”, in Fenwick, C. and Novitz, T. (Eds), Human rights at work: perspectives on law and regulation, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 2010, pp. 487-508.
  • Palit, A. (Ed.), The Trans-Pacific Partnership, China and India: economic and political implications, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315772271
  • Pérez-López, J. F., “Worker rights in the U.S. omnibus trade and competitiveness act”, in Labor Law Journal, Vol. 41(1990), nº 4, pp. 222-234.
  • Ramírez Bonilla, J. J., “El TPP vis-à-vis el RCEP: ventajas y desventajas de ambos proyectos”, México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, nº 6 (2014), pp. 17-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32870/mycp.v3i6.416
  • Schott, J. J. and Cimino-Isaacs, C. (Eds.), Assessing the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Vol. II: “Innovations in trading rules”, Peterson Institute for International Economics, March 2016.
  • Sierralta Ríos, A., Teoría evolutiva del comercio internacional, ESAN Ediciones, Lima, 2014.
  • Singh, N., “The Impact of International Labor Standards: A survey of Economic Theory”, in Basu, K., Horn, H., Román, L. and Shapiro, J. (Eds.). International Labor Standards. History, Theory and Policy Options, Blackwell Publishing, EGDI, Malden, Oxford et als., 2003, pp.
  • Staiger, R. W., “A Role for the WTO”, in Basu, H et als. (Eds.), International Labor Standards. History, Theory and Policy Options, Blackwell Publishing, EGDI, Malden, Oxford et al., 2003, pp. 273-308.
  • Tsogas, G., “Labour standards in the generalized systems of preferences of the European Union and the United States”, in European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 6 (2000), nº3, pp. 349-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095968010063006
  • UNCTAD, Informe sobre las inversiones en el mundo 2014, Nueva York y Ginebra, 2014.
  • UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2014, New-York and Geneva, 2014.
  • UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2016, New-York and Geneva, 2016.
  • Ushakova, T., “La dimensión social de los acuerdos de inversiones”, Nueva Revista Española de Derecho del Trabajo, Vol. 173 (2015), pp. 81-115.
  • Ushakova, T., “Hacia la justicia social: vías de intervención de la OMC”, Revista Internacional y Comparada de Relaciones Laborales y Derecho del Empleo, Vol. 4 (2016), nº 2, pp. 129-166.
  • Van Roozendaal, G., “The Diffusion of Labour Standards: The Case of the US and Guatemala”, Politics and Governance, Vol. 3, 2015, pp. 18-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i2.182
  • Voon, T. (Ed.), Trade liberalization and international co-ooperation: a legal analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, Edwar Elgar, 2013.
La source de données: Dialnet