Imaginarios del feminismo y discurso político: ¿retórica o discurso del odio?

  1. Javier Díaz-Bajo Rodríguez
  2. Rut Martínez Borda
  3. Sara Infante Pineda
Journal:
Miguel Hernández Communication Journal

ISSN: 1989-8681

Year of publication: 2024

Issue: 15

Pages: 365-389

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Miguel Hernández Communication Journal

Abstract

The proliferation of hostile discourses in the political sphere has increased in re-cent times as a consequence of a pressing ideological polarization in relation to the social phenomenon of feminism. This work explores the polarized discursive production of the main Spanish polit-ical formations on their Instagram ac-counts, after the application of Organic Law 10/2022 of September 6, compre-hensively guaranteeing sexual freedom, known in the media as the law of “only yes is yes”. Through content analysis and critical discourse analysis, the contents that stage social visions of women and feminism are addressed, and that were published by the political parties themselves on their Instagram accounts since 11/01/22. as of 04/30/23. The results obtained allow us to identify how political parties enact intersubjective and imaginary visions of what women and feminism should be, through rhetorically hostile and intolerant speeches. From this point of view, this work aims to stimulate reflection on the productive role that Spanish political parties adopt when inciting hatred through language.

Bibliographic References

  • Basulto, O., Segovia L, P., y Julian, C. (2020). Imaginarios y representaciones para configurar un perfil mediático de la prensa tradicional en Chile: El caso del diario El Mercurio y El sur en torno al movimiento estudiantil universitario 2011. Universum (Talca. Impresa), 35(1), 250–287. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-23762020000100250
  • Ben-David, A & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Hate Speech and Covert Discrimination on Social Media: Monitoring the Facebook Pages of Extreme-Right Political Parties in Spain, International Journal of Communication 10, 1167-1193.
  • Cartes, MJ.; (2018). El uso de Instagram por los partidos políticos catalanes durante el referendum del 1-O, Revista de Comunicación, SEECI, 47, 17-36. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2018.0
  • Chakraborti, N. et al (2014). The Leicester Hate Crime Project. Findings and Conclusions. Leicester, University of Leicester.
  • Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing Mediatization: Context, Traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191-202.
  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
  • Gagliardone, I., Gal, D., Alves, T., & Martinez, G. (2015). Countering online hate speech. Unesco
  • Publishing. University of Oxford.
  • Guix, J. (2007). El análisis de contenidos ¿qué nos están diciendo? Calidad Asistencial, 23(1), 26-30
  • Howard, J. W. (2019) “Free Speech and Hate Speech”. Annual Review of Political Science 22: 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051517-012343
  • Instagram. (2022). Comunidad: Respect other members of the Instagram community. https://help.instagram.com/477434105621119/?helpref=hc_fnav
  • Jurado Martín, M. (2010). La investigación académica sobre periodismo en México: una mirada crítica. Revista Mediterránea De Comunicación, 1(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2010.1.1.08
  • Khosravinik, M. & Esposito, E. (2018). Online hate, Digital Discourse and critique: exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility, Lodz Paper in Pragmatics, 14.1, 45-68.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis. An introduction to its methodology. SAGE Publications.
  • Laclau, E. (2005) “Populism. What’s in a Name?”, en Panizza, F. (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, 33-49. London: Verso
  • Leaver, T., Highfield, T., & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Polity Press.
  • Losada-Díaz, J. C., Zamora-Medina, R., & Martinez-Martínez, H. (2021). El discurso del odio en Instagram durante las Elecciones Generales 2019 en España. Revista Mediterránea De Comunicación, 12(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.19142
  • Marciel Pariente, R. (2022). Populismo y discursos del odio: un matrimonio evitable (en teoría). Isegoría, (67), e06. https://doi.org/10.3989/isegoria.2022.67.06
  • Miró Llinares, F. (2016). Taxonomía de la comunicación violenta y el discurso del odio en Internet. IDP. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política, 22, 82-107. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=78846481007
  • Riffo-Pavón, I. (2022). Imaginarios sociales, representaciones sociales y re-presentaciones discursivas. Cinta de Moebio, 74, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2022000200078
  • Segovia Lacoste, P., Basulto Gallegos, O., & Zambrano Uribe, P. (2018). Imaginarios sociales y representaciones: su aplicación a análisis discursivos en tres ámbitos diferentes. Empiria. Revista De metodología De Ciencias Sociales, (41), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.41.2018.22605
  • Sola, J. (2021) “La confusión populista: problemas conceptuales y sesgos ideológicos”. Revista Internacional de Sociología 79 (2): e187. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2021.79.2.20.02
  • Torres Cubeiro, M., & Carretero, Á. E. (2020). The Social Imaginaries Sociologies: the beginning of a needed conceptual clarification. Sociedad Hoy, (28), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.29393/sh28-7simt20007
  • Torrijos Zurita, R. (2021). Formas de pensar, sentir y ser en el mundo figurado de la empresa. [Tesis de Doctorado, Universidad de Alcalá]. Repositorio Institucional – Universidad de Alcalá.
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and Discourse. En: Freeden, M., & Stears, M. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies, 175-196. Oxford University Press.
Data source: Dialnet