Efficiency in educationa review of literature and a way forward

Referencias bibliográficas

• Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. (2002). A data envelopment analysis of the efficiency of Victorian TAFE institutes. The Australian Economic Review, 35(1), 55–69.
• Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: A data envelopment analysis, Economics of Education Review, 22, 89-97.
• Abbott, M. and Doucouliagos, C. (2009). Competition and efficiency: Overseas students and technical efficiency in Australian and New Zealand universities. Education Economics, 17(1), 31–57.
• Abramo, G. and D’Angelo, C.A. (2009). Assessing technical and cost efficiency of research activities: A case study of the Italian university system, Research Evaluation, 18(1), 61-70.
• Afonso, A. and Aubyn, M.S. (2006). Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semiparametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs, Economic Modelling, 23, 476-491.
• Agasisti, T. (2011a). How competition affects schools' performances: Does specification matter? Economic Letters, 110, 259-261.
• Agasisti, T. (2011b). Performances and spending efficiency in higher education: A European comparison through non-parametric approaches, Education Economics, 19(2), 199-224.
• Agasisti, T. (2013). The Efficiency of Italian Secondary Schools and the Potential Role of Competition: A Data Envelopment Analysis Using OECD-PISA2006 Data, Education Economics, 21(5), 520-544.
• Agasisti, T. (2014). The Efficiency of Public Spending on Education: An Empirical Comparison of EU Countries. European Journal of Education, 49(4), 543-557.
• Agasisti, T. and Bonomi, F. (2014). Benchmarking Universities' Efficiency Indicators in the Presence of Internal Heterogeneity. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1237-1255.
• Agasisti, T. and Dal Bianco, A. (2006). Data Envelopment Analysis of the Italian University System: Theoretical Issues and Policy Implications, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 8(4), 344-367.
• Agasisti, T. and Dal Bianco, A. (2009). Reforming the university sector: effects on teaching efficiency—evidence from Italy, Higher Education, 57, 477-498.
• Agasisti, T. and Johnes, G. (2009). Beyond frontiers: Comparing the efficiency of higher education decisionmaking units across more than one country, Education Economics, 17(1), 59-79.
• Agasisti, T. and Johnes, G. (2010). Heterogeneity and the evaluation of efficiency: The case of Italian universities, Applied Economics, 42(11), 1365-1375.
• Agasisti, T. and Johnes, G. (2015). Efficiency, costs, rankings and heterogeneity: the case of US higher education, Studies in Higher Education, 40(1), 60-82.
• Agasisti, T. and Pérez-Esparrells, C. (2010). Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: The case of Italian and Spanish state universities, Higher Education, 59, 85-103.
• Agasisti, T. and Salerno, C. (2007). Assessing the Cost Efficiency of Italian Universities, Education Economics, 15(4), 455-471.
• Agasisti, T., Catalano, G., Landoni, P. and Verganti, R. (2012). Evaluating the performance of acadèmic departments: An analysis of research-related output efficiency, Research Evaluation, 21, 2-14.
• Agasisti, T., Dal Bianco, A., Landoni, P., Sala, A. and Salerno, M. (2011). Evaluating the Efficiency of Research in Academic Departments: An Empirical Analysis in an Italian Region, Higher Education Quarterly, 65, 267-289.
• Aigner, D., Lovell, C.A.K., and Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.
• Alexander, W.R.J., Haug, A.A. and Jaforullah, M. (2010). A two-stage double-bootstrap data envelopment analysis of efficiency differences of New Zealand secondary schools, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 34, 99-110.
• Anderson, T.R., Daim, T.U. and Lavoie, F.F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university Technology transfer, Technovation, 27, 306-318.
• Aristovnik, A. (2013). ICT Expenditures and Education Outputs/Outcomes in Selected Developed Countries: An Assessment of Relative Efficiency, Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(3), 222-230.
• Aristovnik, A. and Obadic, A. (2014). Measuring relative efficiency of secondary education in selected EU and OECD countries: The case of Slovenia and Croatia, Technological and Economic Depelopment of Economy, 20(3), 419-433.
• Athanassopoulos, A.D. and Shale, E. (1997). Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education institutions in the UK by means of Data Envelopment Analysis, Education Economics, 5(2), 117-134.
• Avkiran, N.K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian Universities through data envelopment analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35, 57-80.
• Badin, L., Daraio, C. and Simar, L. (2012). How to measure the impact of environmental factors in a nonparametric production model, European Journal of Operational Research, 223, 818-833.
• Banker, R.D, Janakiraman, S. and Natarajan, R. (2004). Analysis of trends in technical and allocative efficiency: An application to Texas public school districts, European Journal of Operational Research, 154, 477-491.
• Barrow, M.M. (1991). Measuring Local Education Authority a Frontier Approach, Economics of Education Review. 10(1), 19-27.
• Bates, J.M. (1997). Measuring predetermined socioeconomic ‘inputs’ when assessing the efficiency of educational outputs, Applied Economics, 29(1), 85-93.
• Battese, G.E. and Corra, G.S. (1977). Estimation of a production frontier model: With applications to the pastoral zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21(3), 169–179.
• Battese, G.E., Rao, D.P., and O'Donnell, C.J. (2004). A metafrontier production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(1), 91-103.
• Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E. and Zaim, S. (2013). Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64, 1810-1830.
• Beasley, J.E. (1990). Comparing University Departments, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 18(2), 171-183.
• Beasley, J.E. (1995). Determining teaching and research efficiencies, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 441-452.
• Bessent, A. and Bessent, W. (1980). Determining the comparative efficiency of schools through Data Envelopment Analysis, Educational Administration Quarterly, 16, 57-75.
• Bessent, A., Bessent, W., Kennington, J. and Reagan, B. (1982). An application of mathematical programming to assess managerial efficiency in the Houston independent school district, Management Science, 28(12), 1355-1367.
• Blackburn, V., Brennan, S. and Ruggiero, J. (2014). Measuring efficiency in Australian Schools: A preliminary analysis, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 48, 4-9.
• Bonaccorsi, A., Daraio, C. and Simar, L. (2006). Advanced indicators of productivity of universities. An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data, Scientometrics, 66(2), 389-410.
• Bonesrønning, H. and Rattsø, J. (1994). Efficiency variation among the Norwegian high schools: Consequences of equalization policy, Economics of Education Review, 13(4), 289-304.
• Bougnol, M.L. and Dulá, J.H. (2006). Validating DEA as a ranking tool: An application of DEA to assess performance in higher education, Annals of Operation Research, 145, 339-365.
• Bradley, S., Johnes, G. and Millington, J. (2001). The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England, European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 545-568.
• Bradley, S., Johnes, J. and Little, A. (2010). Measurement and determinants of efficiency and productivity in the further education sector in England, Bulletin of Economic Research, 62(1), 1-30.
• Brennan, S., Haelermans, C. and Ruggiero, J. (2014). Nonparametric estimation of education productivity incorporating nondiscretionary inputs with an application to Dutch schools, European Journal of Operational Research, 234, 809-818.
• Breu, T.M. and Raab, R.L. (1994). Efficiency and perceived quality of the Nation’s Top 25 national universities and national liberal arts colleges: An application of data envelopment analysis to higher education, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 28(1), 33-45.
• Burney, N.A., Johnes, J., Al-Enezi, M. and Al-Musallam, M. (2013). The efficiency of public schools: The case of Kuwait, Education Economics, 21(4), 360-379.
• Butler, R.J. and Monk, D.H. (1985). The cost of public schooling in New York State. The role of scale and efficiency in 1978-79, Journal of Human Resources, 20(3), 361-381.
• Callan, S.J. and Santerre, R.E. (1990). The production characteristics of local public education: A múltiple product and input analysis, Southern Economic Journal, 57(2), 468-480.
• Carpenter, D.M. and Noller, S.L. (2010). Measuring Charter School Efficiency: An Early Appraisal, Journal of Education Finance, 35(4), 497-415.
• Casu, B. and Thanassoulis, E. (2006). Evaluating cost efficiency in central administrative services, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 34(5), 417-426.
• Caves D.W., Christensen, L.R. and Diewert, W.E. (1982). The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50: 1393–1414.
• Chakraborty, K., Biswas, B. and Lewis, W.C. (2001). Measurement of technical efficiency in públic education: A stochastic and nonstochastic production function approach, Southern Economic Journal, 67(4), 889-905.
• Chalos, P. (1997). An examination of budgetary inefficiency in Education using Data Envelopment Analysis, Financial Accountability & Management, 13(1), 55-69.
• Chalos, P. and Cherian, J. (1995). An application of Data Envelopment Analysis to public sector performance measurement and accountability, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14, 143-160.
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rodhes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rodhes, E. (1981). Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis to program Follow Through, Management Science, 27(6), 668-697.
• Cherchye, L. and Vanden Abeele, P. (2005). On research efficiency. A micro-analysis of Dutch university research in Economics and Business Management, Research Policy, 34, 495-516.
• Cherchye, L., De Witte, K., Ooghe, E. and Nicaise, I. (2010). Efficiency and equity in private and públic education: A nonparametric comparison, European Journal of Operational Research, 202, 563-573.
• Cherchye, L., Perelman, S. and De Witte, K. (2015). An unified productivity-performance approach applied to secondary schools in the Netherlands. Leuven Economics of Education Research – KU Leuven. Mimeo.
• Coelli, T., Rao, D.S.P. and Battese, G. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
• Cokgezen, M. (2009). Technical Efficiencies of Faculties of Economics in Turkey, Education Economics, 17(1), 81-94.
• Colbert, A., Levary, R.R. and Shaner, M.C. (2000). Determining the relative efficiency of MBA programs using DEA, European Journal of Operational Research, 125, 656-669.
• Coleman, J.S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: US GPO.
• Colin-Glass, J., McCallion, G., McKillop, D. G., Rasaratnam, S. and Stringer, K. (2009). Best-practice benchmarking in UK higher education: New nonparametric approaches using financial ratios and profit efficiency methodologies, Applied Economics, 41(2), 249-267.
• Conroy, S.J. and Arguea, N.M. (2008). An estimation of technical efficiency for Florida public elementary schools, Economics of Education Review, 27, 655-663.
• Cooper, S.T. and Cohn, E. (1997). Estimation of a frontier production function for the South Carolina educational process, Economics of Education Review, 16(3), 313-327.
• Cordero-Ferrera, J.M., Crespo-Cebada, E., Pedraja-Chaparro, F. and Santín-González, D. (2011). Exploring educational efficiency divergences across spanish regions in PISA 2006, Revista de Economía Aplicada, 19(3), 117-145.
• Cordero-Ferrera, J.M., Pedraja-Chaparro, F. and Salinas-Jiménez, J. (2008). Measuring efficiency in education: an analysis of different approaches for incorporating nondiscretionary inputs, Applied Economics, 40(10), 1323-1339.
• Cordero-Ferrera, J.M., Pedraja-Chaparro, F. and Santín-González, D. (2010). Enhancing the inclusion of non-discretionary inputs in DEA, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 574-584.
• Cordero-Ferrera, J.M., Santín, D. and Sicilia, G. (2013). Dealing with the Endogeneity Problem in Data Envelopment Analysis, MPRA Paper 47475, University Library of Munich, Germany.
• Crespo-Cebada, E., Pedraja-Chaparro, F. and Santín, D. (2014). Does school ownership matter? An unbiased efficiency comparison for regions of Spain, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41, 153-172.
• Cubbin, J. and Zamani, H. (1996). A comparison of performance indicators for training and Enterprise councils in the UK, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 67(4), 603-632.
• Daneshvary, N. and Clauretie, T.M. (2001). Efficiency and costs in education: year-round versus traditional schedules, Economics of Education Review, 20, 279-287.
• Daraio, C. and Simar, L. (2005). Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: A probabilistic approach, Journal of Productivity Analsysis, 24, 93-121.
• Davutyan, N., Demir, M. and Polat, S. (2010). Assessing the efficiency of Turkish secondary education: Heterogeneity, centralization, and scale diseconomies, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 44, 35-44.
• De Witte, K. and Hudrlikova, L. (2013). What about excellence in teaching? A benevolent ranking of universities, Scientometrics, 96, 337-364.
• De Witte, K. and Kortelainen, M. (2013). What explains the performance of students in a heterogeneous environment? Conditional efficiency estimation with continuous and discrete environmental variables, Applied Economics, 45, 2401-2412.
• De Witte, K. and Rogge, N. (2010). To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance, Scientometrics, 85, 657-680.
• De Witte, K. and Rogge, N. (2011). Accounting for exogenous influences in performance evaluations of teachers, Economics of Education Review, 30, 641-653.
• De Witte, K., Rogge, N., Cherchye, L. and Van Puyenbroeck, T. (2013). Economies of scope in research and teaching: A non-parametric investigation, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 41, 305-314.
• De Witte, K., Thanassoulis, E. Simpson, G., Battisti, G. and Charlesworth-May, A. (2010). Asssessing pupil and school performance by non-parametric and parametric techniques, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1124-1237.
• Dehnokhalaji, A., Korhonen, P.J., Köksalan, M., Nasrabadi, N., and Wallenius, J. (2010). Efficiency analysis to incorporate interval-scale data, European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1116-1121.
• Deller, S.C. and Rudnicki, E. (1993). Production Efficiency in Elementary Education: The Case of Maine Public Schools, Economics of Education Review, 12(1), 45-57.
• Denaux, Z.S. (2009). Determinants of Technical Efficiency: Urban and Rural Public Schools in the State of Georgia, Southwestern Economic Review, 26 (1), 105–115.
• Deutsch, J., Dumas, A. and Silber, J. (2013). Estimating an educational production function for five countries of Latin America on the basis of the PISA data, Economics of Education Review, 36, 245-262.
• Diamond, A.M. and Medewitz, J.N. (1990). Use of data envelopment analysis in an evaluation of the efficiency of the DEEP program for economic education, The Journal of Economic Education, 21(3), 337-354.
• Dolton, P., Marcenaro, O.D. and Navarro, L. (2003). The effective use of student time: A stochastic frontier production function case study, Economics of Education Review, 22, 547-560.
• Duh, R.R., Chen, K.T., Lin, R.C. and Kuo, L.C. (2014). Do internal controls improve operating efficiency of universities? Annals of Operations Research, 221, 173-195.
• Duncombe, W., Miner, J. and Ruggiero, J. (1997). Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency, Public Choice, 93, 1-18.
• Eff, E.A., Klein, C.C. and Kyle, R. (2012). Identifying the Best Buys in US Higher Education, Research in Higher Education, 53, 860-887.
• Emrouznejad, A., and Thanassoulis, E. (2005). A mathematical model for dynamic efficiency using data envelopment analysis, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 160(2), 363-378.
• Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B.R. and Tavares, G. (2010). Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 42, 151-157.
• Engert, F. (1996). The reporting of school district efficiency: The adequacy of ratio measures, Public Budgeting and Financial Management, 8, 247-271.
• Essid, H., Ouellette, P. and Vigeant, S. (2010). Measuring efficiency of Tunisian schools in the presence of quasi-fixed inputs: A bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach, Economics of Education Review, 29, 589-596.
• Essid, H., Ouellette, P. and Vigeant, S. (2013). Small is not that beautiful after all: Measuring the scale efficiency of Tunisian high schools using a DEA-bootstrap method, Applied Economics, 45(9), 1109-1120.
• Essid, H., Ouellette, P. and Vigeant, S. (2014). Productivity, efficiency, and technical change of Tunisian schools: A bootstrapped Malmquist approach with quasi-fixed inputs, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 42, 88-97.
• Fandel, G. (2007). On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: Government’s redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures, European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1), 521-533.
• Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Weber, W.L. (1989). Measuring school district performance, Public Finance Review, 17(4), 409-428.
• Ferrao, M.E. and Couto, A.P. (2014). The use of a school value-added model for educating improvement: A case study from the Portuguese primary education system, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(1), 174-190.
• Flegg, A.T., Allen, D.O., Field, K. and Thurlow, T.W. (2004). Measuring the Efficiency of British Universities: A Multi-Period Data Envelopment Analysis, Education Economics, 12(3), 231-249.
• Fried, H., Lovell, C.A.K. and Schmidt, S. (eds.) (2008). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivitiy Growth, Oxford University Press, UK.
• Fukuyama, H. and Weber, W.L. (2002). Evaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functions. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(9), 992-1003.
• Ganley, J.A. and Cubbin, J.S. (1992). Public Sector Efficiency Measurement: Applications of Data Envelopment Analysis, Amsterdam, North Holland.
• Gershberg, A.I. and Schuermann, T. (2001). The efficiency-equity trade-off of schooling outcomes: públic education expenditures and welfare in Mexico, Economics of Education Review, 20, 27-40.
• Giménez, V.M. and Martínez, J.L. (2006). Cost efficiency in the university: A departmental evaluation model, Economics of Education Review, 25, 543-553.
• Giménez, V.M., Prior, D. and Thieme, C. (2007). Technical efficiency, managerial efficiency and objectivesetting in the educational system: An international comparison, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 996-1007.
• Greene, W. (2005). Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model.
• Grosskopf, S. and Moutray, C. (2001). Evaluating Performance in Chicago Public High Schools in the Wake of Decentralization, Economics of Education Review, 20, 1-14.
• Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K. and Taylor, L.L. (2009). The relative efficiency of charter schools, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(1), 67-87.
• Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K. and Taylor, L.L. (2014). Efficiency in Education: Research and Implications, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 36(2), 175-210.
• Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K., Taylor, L.L. and Weber, W.L. (1997). Budget-constrained frontier measures of fiscal equality and efficiency in schooling, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(1), 116-124.
• Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K., Taylor, L.L. and Weber, W.L. (1999). Anticipating the consequences of School reform: A new use of DEA, Management Science, 45(4), 608-620.
• Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K., Taylor, L.L. and Weber, W.L. (2001). On the determinants of school district efficiency: Competition and monitoring, Journal of Urban Economics, 49, 453-478.
• Haelermans, C. and Blank, J.L.T. (2012). Is a schools’ performance related to technical change? A study on the relationship between innovations and secondary school productivity, Computers & Education, 59, 884-892.
• Haelermans, C. and De Witte, K. (2012). The role of innovations in secondary school performance -Evidence from a conditional efficiency model, European Journal of Operational Research, 223, 541-549.
• Haelermans, C. and Ruggiero, J. (2013). Estimating technical and allocative efficiency in the public sector: A nonparametric analysis of Dutch schools, European Journal of Operational Research, 227, 174-181.
• Haelermans, C., De Witte, K. and Blank, J.L.T. (2012). On the Allocation of Resources for Secondary Schools, Economics of Education Review, 31, 575-586.
• Haksever, C. and Muragishi, Y. (1998). Measuring value in MBA programmes, Education Economics, 6(1), 11-25.
• Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input based schooling policies. The Economic Journal, 113, 64–98.
• Hanushek, E.A. and Luque, J.A. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world, Economics of Education Review, 22, 481-502.
• Heshmati, A. and Kumbhakar, S.C. (1997). Efficiency of the Primary and Secondary Schools in Sweden, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 41(1), 33-51.
• Houck, E.A., Rolle, R.A. and He, J. (2010). Examining School District Efficiency in Georgia, Journal of Education Finance, 35(4), 331-357.
• Hu, Y., Zhang, Z. and Liang, W. (2009). Efficiency of Primary Schools in Beijing, China: An Evaluation by Data Envelopment Analysis, International Journal of Educational Management, 23(1), 34-50.
• Izadi, H., Johnes, G., Oskrochi, R. and Crouchley, R. (2002). Stochastic Frontier Estimation of a CES Cost Function: The Case of Higher Education in Britain, Economics of Education Review, 21, 63-71.
• Jesson, D., Mayston, D. and Smith, P. (1987). Performance assessment in the education sector: Educational and economic perspectives, Oxford Review of Education, 13(3), 249-266.
• Jiménez, E. and Paqueo, V. (1996). Do local contributions affect the efficiency of public primary schools? Economics of Education Review, 15(4), 377-386.
• Johnes, G. (2013). Efficiency in English higher education institutions revisited: A network approach, Economics Bulletin, 33(4), 2698-2706.
• Johnes, G. and Johnes, J. (1993). Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Oxford Economic Papers, 45(2), 332-347.
• Johnes, G. and Johnes, J. (2009). Higher Education Institutions' Costs and Efficiency: Taking the Decomposition a Further Step, Economics of Education Review, 28, 107-113.
• Johnes, G. and Schwarzenberger, A. (2011). Differences in Cost Structure and the Evaluation of Efficiency: The Case of German Universities, Education Economics, 19(5), 487-499.
• Johnes, G., Johnes J. and Thanassoulis E. (2008). An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England, Studies on Higher Education, 33(5), 527-549.
• Johnes, J. (1996). Performance assessment in higher education in Britain, European Journal of Operational Research, 89, 18-33.
• Johnes, J. (2004). Efficiency measurement. In The International Handbook on the Economics of Education.
• G. Johnes and J. Johnes (ed). Cheltenham, Edward Elgar: 613-742.
• Johnes, J. (2006a). Data Envelopment Analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education, Economics of Education Review, 25, 273-288.
• Johnes, J. (2006b). Measuring efficiency: A comparison of multilevel modelling and data envelopment analysis in the context of higher education, Bulleting of Economic Research, 58(2), 75-104.
• Johnes, J. (2006c). Measuring teaching efficiency in higher education: An application of data envelopment analysis to economics graduates from UK Universities 1993, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 443-456.
• Johnes, J. (2008). Efficiency and productivity change in the English higher education sector from 1996/97 to 2004/5, The Manchester School, 76(6), 653-674.
• Johnes, J. (2014a). Efficiency and mergers in English higher education 1996/97 to 2008/09: Parametric and non-parametric estimation of the multi-input multi-output distance function, The Manchester School, 82(4), 465-487.
• Johnes, J. (2014b). Operational Research in education. European Journal of Operational Research. 243(3), 683-696.
• Johnes, J. and Johnes, G. (1995). Research funding and performance in U.K. university departments of economics: A frontier analysis, Economics of Education Review, 14(3), 301-314.
• Johnes, J. and Yu, L. (2008). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis, China Economic Review, 19, 679-696.
• Johnes, J., Bradley, S. and Little, A. (2012). Efficiency in the Further Education Sector in England, Open Journal of Statistics, 2, 131-140.
• Johnson, A.L. and Ruggiero, J. (2014). Nonparametric measurement of productivity and efficiency in education, Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), 197-210.
• Joumady, O. and Ris, C. (2005). Performance in European higher education: A non-parametric production frontier approach, Education Economics, 13(2), 189-205.
• Kantabutra, S. (2009). Using a DEA management tool through a nonparametric approach: An examination of urban-rural effects on Thai school efficiency, International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 4(2), 1-14.
• Kantabutra, S. and Tang, J. C. S. (2010). Efficiency analysis of public universities in Thailand, Tertiary Education and Management, 16(1), 15-33.
• Kao, C. and Hung, H.T. (2008). Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empirical study, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 36, 653-664.
• Kao, C. and Yang, Y.C. (1992). Evaluation of junior colleges of technology: The Taiwan case, European Journal of Operational Research, 72(1), 43-51.
• Katharaki, M. and Katharakis, G. (2010). A comparative assessment of Greek universities' efficiency using quantitative analysis, International Journal of Educational Research, 49(4-5), 115-128.
• Kempkes, G. and Pohl, C. (2010). The efficiency of German universities–some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods, Applied Economics, 42(16), 2063-2079.
• Khalili, M., Camanho, A.S., Portela, M.C.A.S. and Alirezaee, M.R. (2010). The measurement of relative efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis with assurance regions that link inputs and outputs, European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 761-770.
• Kiong, P.L.N, Hoo, L.S., Yong, H.T. and Mahdi, R. (2005). Evaluating school efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis, Social and Management Research Journal, 2(1), 29-47.
• Kirjavainen, T. (2012). Efficiency of Finnish general upper secondary schools: An application of Stochastic Frontier Analysis with panel data, Education Economics, 20(4), 343-364.
• Kirjavainen, T. and Loikkanen, H.A. (1998). Efficiency differences of Finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and Tobit analysis, Economics of Education Review, 17(4), 377-394.
• Kocher, M.G., Luptàcik, M. and Sutter, M. (2006). Measuring productivity of research in economics. A cross-country study using DEA, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 40, 314-332.
• Koksal, G. and Nalcaci, B. (2006). The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A Data Envelopment Analysis, Higher Education, 51, 173-189.
• Kong, W-H. and Fu, T-T. (2012). Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using Data Envelopment Analysis and student based value-added performance indicators, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 40, 541-549.
• Korhonen, P., Tainio, R. and Wallenius, J. (2001). Value efficiency analysis of academic research, European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 121-132.
• Kounetas, K., Anastasiou, A., Mitropoulos, P. and Mitropoulos, I. (2011). Departmental efficiency differences within a Greek university: An application of a DEA and Tobit analysis, International Transactions in Operational Research, 18, 545-559.
• Kuah, C.T. and Wong, K.Y. (2011). Efficiency assessment of universities through Data Envelopment Analysis, Procedia Computer Science, 3, 499-506.
• Kuo, J-S. and Ho, Y-C. (2008). The cost efficiency impact of the university operation fund on públic universities in Taiwan, Economics of Education Review, 27, 603-612.
• Lara, B., Mizala, A., and Repetto, A. (2011). The effectiveness of private voucher education? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 119–137.
• Lee, B.L. (2011). Efficiency of research performance of Australian Universities: A reappraisal using a bootstrap truncated regression approach, Economic Analysis and Policy, 41(3), 195-203.
• Lenkeit, J. (2013). Effectiveness measures for cross-sectional studies: a comparison of value-added models and contextualised attainment models, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(1), 39-63.
• Liu, J.S., Lu, L.Y.Y., Lu, W.M. and Lin, B.J.Y. (2013). A survey of DEA applications, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 41(5), 893-902.
• Lovell, C.A.K. (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency, in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications (Eds), H. Lovell, C.A.K., and Schmidt, Oxford University Press, New York.
• Lu, Y-H. and Chen, K-H. (2013). Appraising the cost efficiency of higher technological and vocational education institutions in Taiwan using the metafrontier cost-function model, Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 627-663.
• Mace, J. (1984). The economics of education: A revisionist’s view, Higher Education Review, 16(3), 39-56.
• Madden, G., Savage, S. and Kemp, S. (1997). Measuring public sector efficiency: A study of econòmics departments at Australian universities, Education Economics, 5(2), 153-168.
• Mainardes, E., Alves, H. and Raposo, M. (2014). Using expectations and satisfaction to measure the frontiers of efficiency in public universities, Tertiary Education and Management, 20(4), 339-353.
• Mancebón M.J. and Bandrés, E. (1999) Efficiency evaluation in secondary schools: The key role of model specification and of ex post analysis of results. Education Economics, 7(2), 131–152.
• Mancebón, M.J and Mar-Molinero, C.M. (2000). Performance in primary schools, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 843-854.
• Mancebón, M.J. and Muñiz, M.A. (2008). Private versus public high schools in Spain: Disentangling managerial and programme efficiencies, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59, 892-901.
• Mancebón, M.J., Calero, J., Choi, A. and Ximenez-de-Embún, D.P. (2012). The efficiency of public and publicly subsidized high schools in Spain: Evidence from PISA-2006, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 1516-1533.
• Mar-Molinero, C. (1996). On the joint determination of efficiencies in a Data Envelopment Analysis context, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(10), 1273-1279.
• Mayston, D.J. (2003). Measuring and managing educational performance, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54, 679-691.
• Mayston, D.J. (2015). Analysing the effectiveness of public service producers with endogenous resourcing, Journal of Productivity Analysis, DOI 10.1007/s11123-014-0428-5.
• Mayston, D.J. and Jesson, D. (1988). Developing models of educational accountability, Oxford Review of Education, 14(3), 321-339.
• McCarty, T.A. and Yaisawarng, S. (1993). Technical efficiency in New Jersey school districts. In: Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K., Schmidt, S.S. (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Oxford University Press, New York.
• McEwan, P.J. and Carnoy, M. (2000). The effectiveness and efficiency of private schools in Chile's voucher system, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 213-239.
• McMillan, M.L. and Chan, W.H. (2006). University efficiency: A comparison and consolidation of results from stochastic and non-stochastic methods, Education Economics, 14(1), 1-30.
• McMillan, M.L. and Datta, D. (1998). The relative efficiencies of Canadian universities: A DEA perspective, Canadian Public Policy, 24(4), 485-511.
• Meeusen, W. and van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production funcions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18(2), 435–444.
• Millimet, D.L. and Collier, T. (2008). Efficiency in public schools: Does competition matter? Journal of Econometrics, 145, 134-157.
• Misra, K., Grimes, P.W. and Rogers, K.E. (2012). Does competition improve public school efficiency? A spatial analysis, Economics of Education Review, 31, 1177-1190.
• Mizala, A., and Torche, F. (2012). Bringing the schools back in: The stratification of educational achievement in the Chilean voucher system? International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 132–144.
• Mizala, A., Romaguera, P. and Farren, D. (2002). The technical efficiency of schools in Chile, Applied Economics, 34, 1533-1552.
• Mongan, C.J., Santín, D. and Valino, A. (2011). Towards the equality of educational opportunity in the province of Buenos Aires, Journal of Policy Modelling, 33, 583-596.
• Montoneri, B., Lin, T.T., Lee, C-C. and Huang, S-L. (2012). Application of Data Envelopment Analysis on the indicators contributing to learning and teaching performance, Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 28(3), 382-395.
• Moreno, A.A. and Tadepali, R. (2002). Assessing academic department efficiency at a public university, Managerial and Decision Economics, 23(7), 385-397.
• Mortimore, P. (1991). School effectiveness research: Which way at the crossroads? School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 213-229.
• Muñiz, M.A. (2002). Separating managerial inefficiency and external conditions in Data Envelopment Analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, 143, 625-643.
• Naper, L.R. (2010). Teacher hiring practices and educational efficiency, Economics of Education Review, 29, 658-668.
• Nazarko, J. and Saparauskas, J. (2014). Application of DEA method in efficiency evaluation of public higher education institutions, Technological and Economic development of Economy, 20(1), 25-44.
• Oliveira, M.A. and Santos, C. (2005). Assessing school efficiency in Portugal using FDH and bootstrapping, Applied Economics, 37(8), 957-968.
• Ondrich, J. and Ruggiero, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement in the Stochastic Frontier Model, European Journal of Operational Research, 129(2), 434-442.
• Ouellette, P. and Vierstraete, V. (2005). An evaluation of the efficiency of Québec's school boards using the Data Envelopment Analysis method, Applied Economics, 37(14), 1643-1653.
• Ouellette, P. and Vierstraete, V. (2010). Malmquist indexes with quasi-fixed inputs: An application to School districts in Québec, Annals of Operations Research, 173(1), 57-76.
• Perelman, S. and Santín, D. (2011a). Measuring educational efficiency at student level with Parametric Stochastic Distance Functions: An application to Spanish PISA results, Education Economics, 19(1), 29-49.
• Perelman, S. and Santín, D. (2011b). Imposing monotonicity on outputs in parametric distance function estimations, Applied Economics, 43(30), 4651-4661.
• Podinovski, V.V., Ismail, I., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T. and Zhang, W. (2014). Combining the assumptions of variable and constant returns to scale in the efficiency evaluation of secondary schools, European Journal of Operational Research, 239(2), 504-513.
• Portela, M.C.A.S. and Camanho, A.S. (2010). Analysis of complementary methodologies for the estimation of school value added, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61, 1122-1132.
• Portela, M.C.A.S. and Thanassoulis, E. (2001). Decomposing school and school-type efficiency, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 132, 357-373.
• Portela, M.C.A.S., Camanho, A.S. and Borges, D. (2012). Performance assessment of secondary schools: the snapshot of a country taken by DEA, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63, 1098-1115.
• Portela, M.C.A.S., Camanho, A.S. and Keshvari, A. (2013). Assessing the evolution of school performance and value-added: Trends over four years, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 39, 1-14.
• Powel, B.A., Gilleland, D.S. and Pearson, L.C. (2012). Expenditures, efficiency, and effectiveness in U.S. undergraduate higher education: A national benchmark model, The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 102-127.
• Primont, D.F. and Domazlicky, B. (2006). Student achievement and efficiency in Missouri schools and the No Child Left Behind Act, Economics of Education Review, 25, 77-90.
• Psacharopoulos, G. (1996). Economics of education: A research agenda, Economics of Education Review, 15(4), 339-344.
• Rassouli-Currier, S. (2007). Assessing the efficiency of Oklahoma public schools: A data envelopment analysis, Southwestern Economic Review, 131-144.
• Ray, S.C. (1991). Resource-use efficiency in public schools: A study of Connecticut data, Management Science, 37(12), 1620-1628.
• Ray, S.C. and Jeon, Y. (2008). Reputation and efficiency: A non-parametric assessment of America's toprated MBA programs, European Journal of Operational Research, 189, 245-268.
• Ray, S.C. and Mukherjee, K. (1998). Quantity, quality, and efficiency for a partially super-additive cost function: Connecticut public schools revisited, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 10, 47-62.
• Rayeni, M.M. and Saljooghi, F.H. (2010). Network Data Envelopment Analysis model for estimating efficiency and productivity in universities, Journal of Computer Science, 6(11), 1252-1257.
• Reynolds, D. (2010). Failure free education? The past, present and future of school effectiveness and School improvement. London: Routledge.
• Reynolds, D., Creemers, B.P.M., Stringfield, S., Teddlie, C., Schaffer, E. and Nesselrodt, P.S. (1994). Advances in school effectiveness research and practice, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Robst, J. (2001). Cost efficiency in public higher education institutions, The Journal of higher education, 72(6), 730-750.
• Ruggiero, J. (1996a). On the measurement of technical efficiency in the public sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 90, 553-565.
• Ruggiero, J. (1996b). Efficiency of educational production: An analysis of New York school districts, Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(3), 499-509.
• Ruggiero, J. (1999). Nonparametric analysis of educational costs, European Journal of Operational Research, 119(3), 605-612.
• Ruggiero, J. (2000). Nonparametric estimation of returns to scale in the public sector with an application to the provision of educational services, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51, 906-912.
• Ruggiero, J. (2004). Performance evaluation when non-discretionary factors correlate with technical efficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 159(1), 250-257.
• Ruggiero, J. (2005). Impact assessment of input omission on DEA. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 4(03), 359-368.
• Ruggiero, J. (2007). Measuring the cost of meeting minimum educational standards: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Education Economics, 15(1), 1-13.
• Ruggiero, J. and Bretschneider, S. (1998). The weighted Russell measure of technical efficiency, European Journal of Operational Research, 108, 438-451.
• Ruggiero, J. and Vitaliano, D.F. (1999). Assessing the efficiency of public schools using Data Envelopment Analysis and frontier regression, Contemporary Economic Policy, 17(3), 321-331.
• Ruggiero, J., Duncombe, W. and Miner, J. (1995). On the measurement and causes of technical inefficiency in local public services: With an application to public education, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(4), 403-428.
• Santín, D. and Sicilia, G. (2014). The teacher effect: An efficiency analysis from a natural experiment in Spanish primary schools. Workshop on efficiency in education. Lancaster University Management School. London, September 19-20, 2014.
• Sarrico, C.S. and Dyson, R.G. (2000). Using DEA for planning in UK universities, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(7), 789-800.
• Sarrico, C.S. and Rosa, M.J. (2009). Measuring and comparing the performance of Portuguese secondary schools: A confrontation between metric and practice benchmarking, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(8), 767-786.
• Sarrico, C.S., Rosa, M. and Coelho, I. (2010). The performance of Portuguese secondary schools: An exploratory study. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(4), 286-303.
• Sengupta, J.K. (1987). Production frontier estimation to measure efficiency: A critical evaluation in light of data envelopment analysis, Managerial and Decision Economics, 8(2), 93-99.
• Sengupta, J.K. and Sfeir, R.E. (1986). Production frontier estimates of scale in public schools in California, Economics of Education Review, 5(3), 297-307.
• Sengupta, J.K. and Sfeir, R.E. (1988). Efficiency measurement by Data Envelopment Analysis with econometric applications, Applied Economics, 20(3), 285-293.
• Sexton, T.R., Comunale, C.L. and Gara, S.C. (2012). Efficiency-Based Funding for Public Four-Year Colleges and Universities, Education Finance and Policy, 7(3), 331-359.
• Simar, L. and Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes, Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31-64.
• Sinuany-Stern, Z., Mehrez, A. and Barboy, A. (1994). Academic departments efficiency via DEA, Computers & Operations Research, 21(5), 543-556.
• Smith, P. and Mayston, D. (1987). Measuring efficiency in the public sector, OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, 15(3), 191-189.
• Stevens, P.A. (2005). A Stochastic Frontier Analysis of English and Welsh universities, Education Economics, 13(4), 355-374.
• Tauer, L.W., Fried, H.O. and Fry, W.E. (2007). Measuring efficiencies of academic departments within a college. Education Economics, 15(4), 473-489.
• Taylor, J. and Johnes, J. (1989). An evaluation of performance indicators based upon the first destination of university graduates, Studies in Higher Education, 14(2), 201-217.
• Teddlie, C. (2010). The legacy of the school effectiveness research tradition, in Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, A. Fullan, M. and Hopkins, D. (Eds.). The second international handbook of educational change. Springer.
• Teddlie, C. and Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research, Falmer Press.
• Thanassoulis, E. (1996). Altering the bias in differential school effectiveness using Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 4(7), 882-894.
• Thanassoulis, E. (1999). Setting achievements targets for school children, Education Economics, 7(2), 101-119.
• Thanassoulis, E. and Dunstan, P. (1994). Guiding schools to improved performance using Data Envelopment Analysis: An illustration with data from a local education authority, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(11), 1247-1262.
• Thanassoulis, E. and Portela, M.C.A.S. (2002). School outcomes: Sharing the responsibility between pupil and school? Education Economics, 10(2), 183-207.
• Thanassoulis, E., Kortelainen, M., Johnes, G. and Johnes, J. (2011). Costs and efficiency of higher education institutions in England: a DEA analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62, 1282-1297.
• Thieme, C., Giménez, V. and Prior, D. (2012). A comparative analysis of the efficiency of national education systems, Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(1), 1-15.
• Thieme, C., Prior, D. and Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2013). A multilevel decomposition of school performance using robust nonparametric frontier techniques, Economics of Education Review, 32, 104-121.
• Thursby, J.G. (2000). What do we say about ourselves and what does it mean? Yet another look at econòmics department research, Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 383-404.
• Timmermans, A.C., Doolaard, S. and de Wolf, I. (2011). Conceptual and empirical differences among various value-added models for accountability, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(4), 393-413.
• Titus, M.A. (2006). Understanding college degree completion of students with low socioeconomic status: The influence of the institutional financial context. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 371-398.
• Tochkov, K., Nenovsky, N. and Tochkov, K. (2012). University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria, Post-Comunist Economies, 24(4), 517-534.
• Tsionas, E.G. (2002). Stochastic frontier models with random coefficients. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17, 127-147.
• Tyagi, P., Yadav, S.P. and Singh, S.P. (2009). Relative performance of academic departments using DEA with sensitivity analysis, Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 168-177.
• Van Klaveren, C. and De Witte, K. (2014). How are teachers teaching? A nonparametric approach. Education Economics 22 (1), 3-23.
• Waldo, S. (2007a). On the use of student data in efficiency analysis - Technical efficiency in Swedish upper secondary school, Economics of Education Review, 26, 173-185.
• Waldo, S. (2007b). Efficiency in Swedish public education: Competition and voter monitoring, Education Economics, 15(2), 231-251.
• Wang, S. (2003). Adaptive non-parametric efficiency frontier analysis: A neural-network-based model, Computers & Operations Research, 30(2), 279-295.
• Wolszczak-Derlacz, J. and Parteka, A. (2011). Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: A two-stage multicountry approach, Scientometrics, 89, 887-917.
• Worthington, A.C. (2001). An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education, Education Economics, 9(3), 245-268.
• Worthington, A.C. and Lee, B.L. (2008). Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003, Economics of Education Review, 27, 285-298.
• Ying C.N. and Sung K.L. (2000). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Education Economics, 8(2), 139-156.
• Zoghbi, A.C., Rocha, F. and Mattos, E. (2013). Education production efficiency: Evidence from Brazilian universities, Economic Modelling, 31, 94-103.