Technology use by public service interpreters and translatorsthe link between frequency of use and forms of prior training

1. Koen Kerremans
2. Raquel Lázaro Gutiérrez
3. Helene Stengers
4. Antoon Cox
5. Pascal Rillof

Export

Export

×

MLA

modern-language-association

APA

apa

Chicago

chicago-fullnote-bibliography

Harvard

harvard-cite-them-right

Vancouver

vancouver-author-date

---

RIS BibTex

Export

×

This document cannot be exported because it belongs to another portal.

Full text

lock_opene_Buah externo

DOI: 10.37536/FITISPOS-IJ.2019.6.1.211 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_opene_Buah editor

More publications in: FITISPos International Journal: Public Service Interpreting and Translation

Sustainable development goals

• 

Abstract

: In this article, the first results of a large-scale survey on the use of technological bridging instruments in contexts of multilingual service provision will be presented. We will focus on answers given by respondents working as public service interpreters and translators, abbreviated as PSITs (N=188). No restriction was set on specific domains of public service in this study (e.g. education, health, etc.). The article focuses on the question how forms of prior training of PSITs relate to the frequency of use of technological tools in their professional practice, such as computer-assisted translation (CAT) technology, machine translation (MT) systems, Instant Messaging (IM) technology, video conferencing technology (VC), termbase management systems (TB), and combinations thereof.

Data source: Dialnet