¿Cómo ven los maestros en formación la futura evaluación estandarizada a través de tabletas digitales?

  1. García Laborda, Jesús 1
  2. Magal Royo, Teresa 2
  1. 1 Universidad de Alcalá
    info

    Universidad de Alcalá

    Alcalá de Henares, España

    ROR https://ror.org/04pmn0e78

  2. 2 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia
    info

    Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01460j859

Journal:
El Guiniguada

ISSN: 0213-0610,  2386-3374

Year of publication: 2016

Issue: 25

Pages: 52-62

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20420/ELGUINIGUADA.2016.0085 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: El Guiniguada

Abstract

The field of evaluation is acquiring growing importance in Spain . Until recently scholars specialty were few in our country and even today, in the field of foreign languages , the number of researchers is small. One area where the assessment of foreign languages in Spain has been recently set is that of ubiquity. Projects like PAULEX Universitas and more recently OPENPAU have revealed the necessity of the use of mobile devices for conducting standardized tests. In this case we focus on a study conducted on the attitudes of 23 Grade Teacher Training Primary students on the use of mobile devices for assessment in the classroom. The results show great interest and applicability of the system in elementary classrooms.

Bibliographic References

  • AMENGUAL PIZARRO, M. (2003). A study of different composition elements that raters respond To/Estudio de las respuestas de los evaluadores a diferentes elementos de las redacciones. Estudios Ingleses De La Universidad Complutense, 11, 53-72.
  • AMENGUAL-PIZARRO, M. (2009). Does the english test in the spanish university entrance examination influence the teaching of english? English Studies, 90(5), 582-598.
  • CHALHOUB-DEVILLE, M. (2009). The intersection of test impact, validation, and educational reform policy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 118-131.
  • DÍEZ-BEDMAR, M. B. (2011). Spanish pre-university students' use of english: CEA results from the university entrance examination. International Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 141-158.
  • FALSGRAF, C. (2009). The ecology of assessment. Language Teaching, 42(4), 491-503.
  • FIGUERAS, N. (2007). The CEFR, a lever for the improvement of language professionals in europe. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 673.
  • FIGUERAS, N. (2012). The impact of the CEFR. ELT Journal, 66(4), 477-485.
  • GARCÍA LABORDA, J. (2010). ¿Necesitan las universidades españolas una prueba de acceso informatizada? El caso de la definición del constructo y la previsión del efecto en la enseñanza para idiomas extranjeros. Revista de orientación y Psicopadagogía, 21(1),71-80.
  • GARCÍA LABORDA, J., MAGAL ROYO, T., LITZLER, M.F. & GIMÉNEZ LÓPEZ, J.L. (2014). Mobile phones for a University Entrance Examination language test in Spain. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 17-30.
  • HERRERA SOLER, H. (1999). Is the English test in the spanish university entrance examination as discriminating as it should be? Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 7, 89-107.
  • HERRERA SOLER, H., & MARTÍNEZ ARIAS, R. (2002). A new insight into examinee behaviour in a multiple-choice test: A quantitative approach. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 10, 113-137.
  • REMESAL, A. (2007). Educational reform and primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: The Spanish instance, building upon black and William (2005). Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 27-38.
  • REMESAL, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: A qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 27(2), 472-482.
  • TAN, C. (2010). Educational policy trajectories in an era of globalization: Singapore and Cambodia. Prospects, 40(4), 465-480.
  • TROYAN, F. J. (2012). Standards for foreign language learning: Defining the constructs and researching learner outcomes. Foreign Language Annals, 45, S118-S140.
  • WATERS, A. (2014). Managing innovation in english language education: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 47(1), 92-110.
  • WRAGA, W. G. (1998). The comprehensive high school and educational reform in the United States: Retrospect and prospect. The High School Journal, 81(3), 121.
  • ZOHRABI, M., TORABI, M. A., y BAYBOURDIANI, P. (2012). Teacher-centered and/or student-centered learning: English language in Iran. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(3), 18-30.
Data source: Dialnet